DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
EFTA00010451.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel authorization (ID 11164814) for a DOJ employee. The travel, dated December 15-18, 2019, was to Santa Monica, CA, specifically for the purpose of a 'Witness interview' related to the 'Epstein Investigation' (Case ID R20NYS13444). The email indicates the authorization was approved by one individual on April 16, 2020, and was pending further approval.
EFTA00010329.pdf
This document is a calendar entry from October 5, 2020, scheduling a 30-minute call titled 'Call w/ DOJ re. Epstein SDNY Investigation.' The listed attendee is Linda Singer, and the location appears to be a conference line with a specific passcode. The entry is marked as 'X-PERSONAL' and includes a Bates stamp EFTA00010329.
EFTA00010328.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated October 5, 2020, sent to Linda Singer. It confirms the acceptance of a scheduled meeting or call with the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the Epstein SDNY (Southern District of New York) investigation. The sender's identity is redacted.
EFTA00010178.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between USANYS staff and contractors regarding the processing of Amazon subpoena returns for the US v. Epstein/Maxwell case (referenced in file paths as 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'). The emails discuss adding materials to the 'Twenty-Eighth Production' and 'Rule 16 production', as well as drafting a discovery cover letter. The file paths indicate the documents are stored on the DOJ cloud system.
EFTA00010176.pdf
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request dated November 11, 2021, for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). It requests travel arrangements for an unidentified fact witness (specifically noted not to be a victim-witness) to arrive in the Southern District of New York on December 1, 2021, and depart on the evening of December 3, 2021. The witness requires a hotel but has no unusual travel expenses.
EFTA00010148.pdf
This document is an email sent on November 30, 2018, with the subject 'Epstein'. The sender and recipients are redacted. The body of the email inquires about a trial scheduled for December 4, specifically asking for clarification on whether the case is against the DOJ or Epstein, and if it is being held in state or federal court.
EFTA00010022.pdf
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form dated November 11, 2021, submitted to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted fact witness (not a victim-witness) to appear for trial on December 1, 2021, with a stay estimated through December 3, 2021. The form confirms the witness requires a hotel but has no unusual travel expenses.
EFTA00009964.pdf
An internal email from a USANYS Paralegal Specialist dated September 9, 2019, regarding the collection of evidence for the 'InReEpsteinDeath' investigation. The sender confirms the location of commissary reports and receipts for Epstein and other redacted individuals but highlights that 'signed SHU post order review sheets' and daily assignment rosters are missing for the critical period (July 1 to August 10, 2019) leading up to Epstein's death.
EFTA00009904.pdf
This document is a series of emails from whistleblower Chris Dilorio to redacted recipients (likely SEC or government officials) between April and May 2019. Dilorio alleges a massive money laundering scheme involving Environmental Solutions Worldwide (ESWW), Apollo Global Management, Leon Black, and Jeffrey Epstein. He further claims that the SEC is complicit in these frauds and notes a 'quid pro quo' arrangement where an SEC investigation into Apollo was dropped after a meeting between Apollo's Joshua Harris and Jared Kushner, followed by a large loan to Kushner's business. Dilorio also reports receiving anonymous threats.
EFTA00009800.pdf
This document is an email circulating an Associated Press article from March 5, 2020. The article details a criminal investigation by the Justice Department into the flow of contraband, specifically a potential gun, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, where Jeffrey Epstein had died the previous summer. The investigation caused a severe lockdown impacting inmate rights and legal proceedings, drawing criticism from David Patton of the Federal Defenders of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000255.tif
This document is the conclusion section of a legal filing, likely a petition for certiorari, dated July 28, 2025. It argues that the case provides an ideal opportunity for the Court to resolve a split regarding federal plea bargains, particularly in the context of federal prosecution related to "Epstein's circle." The document is submitted by DAVID OSCAR MARKUS and MONA MARKUS of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00000254.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing arguing that a 'Petitioner' should be covered by an immunity clause in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein's offenses. It asserts that the NPA's broad language intended to cover unnamed co-conspirators, including individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell who were known to Epstein's circle or might later be identified. The argument cites legal precedents to support the Petitioner's claim for immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00000192.tif
This document excerpt, labeled 129a and part of a DOJ report, details OPR's criticism of Acosta's decision to approve a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a specific provision within it. The criticism stems from Acosta's alleged failure to consider the potential consequences of the provision and to whom it would apply. The document also includes a reference to Section IV of the Part.
DOJ-OGR-00000152.tif
This document is a legal opinion or court order concerning pretrial proceedings related to Maxwell. It addresses motions in limine, pretrial disclosures, and scheduling, citing legal precedents like United States v. Thompson and United States v. Percevault. The Court sets a schedule for disclosures and notes that the S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge.
DOJ-OGR-00000098.tif
This document is page 35a of a legal file, specifically an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the modification of Paragraph 7, establishing a process involving an independent third party to select an attorney representative for victims. It explicitly states Epstein's agreement to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, while clarifying he is not obligated to pay for contested litigation filed against him.
DOJ-OGR-00030169.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal or policy document dated December 22, 2006, originating from the FBI West Palm Beach RA. It details technical amendments and repeals related to Sections 3486 and 3486A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically concerning federal health care investigations, changing terms like 'summoned' to 'subpoenaed' and 'summons' to 'subpoena'.
DOJ-OGR-00029968.tif
This document is a printout or screenshot of a MySpace.com 'View Image' page, dated May 31, 2007. It contains sponsored links, a copyright notice, and a URL, along with some redaction codes and a DOJ document number. The primary content is a webpage display, not a log or record of specific events related to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00029805.tif
This document is an FBI Form FD-340 (Rev. 4-11-03) used for transmitting evidence or information. It lists a file number 318-MM-1080621A 129, indicates that the acquiring field offices are MM and PBCRA, and notes the date received as 'VARIOUS'. The description states 'Original notes re interview of Biographical file on DOB', with several redaction codes (b6, b7c, b3) present.
DOJ-OGR-00029804.tif
This document appears to be a blank page from a larger record, containing only redaction codes (b6, b7C, b3) and document identifiers (03956-8710, DOJ-OGR-00029804). The main content of the page has been redacted, indicated by the large blank area and the redaction codes.
DOJ-OGR-00029701.tif
This document is an FBI Form FD-340 (Evidence/Information Transmittal) with File Number 312-MM-108062-1A124, indicating that various materials were received by a Special Agent (SA) from the MM/PBCRA field office. The description notes that the transmittal includes 'Original notes re interview of Bioacrohical file on DOB' and 'My Space information', with several redaction codes present.
DOJ-OGR-00029493.tif
This document appears to be a capture of a MySpace.com webpage from October 3, 2006, specifically a user profile page. It includes standard website footer links and copyright information for MySpace, along with document control numbers from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00029385.tif
This document appears to be a redaction log or index, listing page numbers from 157 to 210 with various redaction codes such as 'b6', 'b7C', 'b7D', and sometimes 'b3'. Each line specifies the type and extent of redaction (e.g., '1,-8' or '1,-5,-8') applied to different sections of the document, followed by a '2;' which might indicate a category or reason.
DOJ-OGR-00029337.tif
This document appears to be an administrative page, likely from a larger set of documents related to a legal or investigative matter. It primarily contains redaction codes (b3, b6, b7C) and document identification numbers, indicating that the content of the page itself is minimal and relates to information control or indexing. The visible elements suggest that the original content of the page has been largely redacted, with the redaction codes pointing to specific exemptions under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) or similar regulations.
DOJ-OGR-00029205.tif
This document appears to be a redaction log or a reference guide, listing page numbers (623-676) and associated redaction codes (b3, b6, b7B, b7C, b7D) with numerical values. The document control number 'DOJ-OGR-00029205' suggests it originates from the Department of Justice, Office of Government Information Services.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity