the house
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Communicative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Contact communication |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | The House passed a $4.6 billion emergency spending bill for the humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-M... | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017034.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that the 'household manual' and testimony from Juan Alessi prove Ghislaine Maxwell was not merely an employee but the 'lady of the house' alongside Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that the manual contained specific rules set by Maxwell, including instructions for stationery marked 'Lady Ghislaine,' refuting defense claims that she was unaware of household operations.
DOJ-OGR-00016993.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the 'conscious avoidance' theory, stating that instructions to lie about age came from Virginia, not Ms. Maxwell. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach counters by citing testimony from Mr. Alessi regarding Maxwell recruiting at legitimate hotels, suggesting she may have confused underage girls with adults.
DOJ-OGR-00016992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text captures a legal argument between Mr. Rohrbach and the Court regarding whether the defense has opened the door to the issue of Maxwell's knowledge of the victims' ages. Specific references are made to testimony from Larry Visoski, Kimberly Espinosa, and a victim named Carolyn, who was instructed to lie about her age at 'the house'.
DOJ-OGR-00013054.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Meder, focusing on the provenance of specific photographs entered into evidence. The questioning establishes that the witness testified about photos retrieved from CDs, rather than photos physically displayed on the walls of 'the house.'
DOJ-OGR-00013053.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony focuses on the chain of custody and location of evidence, specifically CDs identified by '1B numbers,' which were found in various locations within a 'house,' including a potential third-floor closet. Meder confirms working for the government to verify these items but states they cannot recall the exact locations where specific CDs were found.
DOJ-OGR-00013003.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a topless photograph of an unnamed victim. The prosecution argues the photo corroborates testimony that the victim was a minor involved in the conspiracy, citing flight logs showing she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell at age 17. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger objects, citing photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi (House Manager) suggesting the victim was an adult (met in 2001/2002) when the events occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00013360.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the admissibility of certain phone records/notes (specifically mentioning one labeled 'JE Natasha'), claiming they lack reliability, dates, and signatures, and do not meet the business record exception. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the records are valid to show who called 'the house' and when, noting that witnesses have corroborated names found in these records.
DOJ-OGR-00013353.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the admissibility of spiral-bound message books kept by household staff, specifically Ms. Hesse, under the 'business records exception.' The defense argues that despite Ms. Hesse's records being well-maintained, other messages in the collection are undated and unsigned, challenging the consistency of the household practice.
DOJ-OGR-00013349.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe argues for the admissibility of names and phone numbers from recorded messages, not for their truth, but as evidence that certain individuals contacted a specific house, consistent with prior victim testimony. She contends this evidence qualifies as a business record.
DOJ-OGR-00013344.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Mrs. Hesse. Hesse describes being instructed by Ghislaine (Maxwell) to record all phone messages in a specific notebook kept in the kitchen whenever Epstein and Maxwell were away from the house. The attorney, Ms. Moe, then presents Government Exhibits to the witness for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00033103.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about their parents filing a police report against Mr. Epstein. The witness is evasive and claims not to know answers, while their counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, citing lack of foundation and speculation.
DOJ-OGR-00014575.jpg
This document is a transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in a criminal case against a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Comey argues against the defense's theory that lawyers fabricated stories about Maxwell for financial gain. She presents evidence that three victims—Jane, Carolyn, and Annie—had reported Maxwell's involvement to friends, boyfriends, and the FBI years prior (in 2006 and 2007), long before any compensation fund or financial incentive existed, thus making the defense's theory untenable.
DOJ-OGR-00011759.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness provides a detailed architectural description of the interior of a seven-story residence, likely Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion. Key features described include a security room with monitors for outside activity, a rotunda library, a massive spiral staircase, and a dumbwaiter connecting a first-floor kitchen to a professional chef's kitchen in the basement.
DOJ-OGR-00020044.jpg
This legal filing argues against the prosecution's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell as a 'master spy' evading arrest. The defense claims Maxwell retreated to a safe room during the FBI raid because her security guard mistook the agents for the press. Additionally, it argues that wrapping her phone in tin foil was to prevent press hacking after her number was leaked by the court, noting the phone was registered to her charity (Terramar Project) and she openly used another phone registered to 'G Max'.
DOJ-OGR-00005823.jpg
This document is page 40 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) from October 29, 2021, arguing for the admissibility of testimony from 'Employee-1'. The text details that Employee-1 will testify that in October 2005, Epstein and a supervisor ordered the removal of computers and contact books from the house. The government argues this testimony proves the defendant's role in the conspiracy, knowledge of the abuse of underage girls, and authenticates exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00031127.jpg
This document is a page from an interview transcript (possibly a deposition or police interview) dated July 26, 2017 (release date). A redacted witness describes the interior of a large residence, specifically noting a 'humongous' shower capable of fitting many people and a distinctive 'hot pink and green' sofa. The witness also recounts giving 'him' (presumably the homeowner) a massage, during which he made a very brief phone call.
DOJ-OGR-00005848.jpg
This legal filing details the government's interactions with Minor Victim-4, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) between 2001 and 2004. It highlights that the defendant personally paid the victim following sexual encounters with Epstein and outlines the victim's interviews with the FBI in 2007 and prosecutors in 2020 and 2021. The document also mentions a photo identification procedure conducted in June 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00014494.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for Ghislaine. Menninger challenges the prosecution's case by questioning the testimony of victims like 'Jane' and 'Annie,' specifically disputing the narrative of 'normalizing' abuse and Ghislaine's presence during an assault. She also attacks the government's proposed motive—that Ghislaine facilitated abuse for financial support—and portrays Jeffrey Epstein as a manipulator who deceived everyone, including Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00014467.jpg
This document is a page from the prosecution's closing argument (summation) by Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor rebuts the defense's claim that Maxwell was too busy managing Epstein's life (including tasks like ordering sand for his private island and interviewing staff in limos) to be involved in crimes. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell participated in the abuse, lived with Epstein, and knew exactly what was happening with the young girls she interacted with.
DOJ-OGR-00014460.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell is guilty of Count Four and Count Six (sex trafficking of a minor). The text details Maxwell's interactions with victims named Kate, Jane, and specifically Carolyn, a 14-year-old middle school dropout whom Maxwell recruited for massage appointments with Epstein knowing she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014447.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal trial against a defendant named Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that the testimony of a witness, Carolyn, proves Maxwell conspired with Epstein to abuse underage girls. The prosecutor highlights that Carolyn's testimony is extensively corroborated by phone messages, FedEx records, her ex-boyfriend Sean, and other witnesses named Annie, Kate, and Jane, and urges the jury to find Maxwell guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00014441.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the testimony of Juan Alessi, who described driving Ghislaine Maxwell near Mar-a-Lago when she spotted Virginia Roberts and ordered the car to stop to recruit her. The prosecutor connects this event to a victim named Carolyn, noting that Carolyn met Maxwell through Virginia Roberts.
DOJ-OGR-00014426.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal case. The prosecutor argues that the victim, Jane, was abused by Maxwell and Epstein for years, starting when she was a teenager, and that her testimony is corroborated by another witness, Juan Alessi. Alessi's testimony confirms he knew Jane at a young age and remembered driving her to the airport with Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014415.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the closing summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The text focuses on a restrictive household manual that warned employees to 'see nothing, hear nothing,' which the prosecution argues was designed to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also highlights a repeating pattern or 'playbook' Maxwell used to exploit multiple victims, specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00017546.jpg
This document is page 184 of a court transcript from the trial USA v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness identified as 'Jane' is under direct examination, describing how casual gatherings at Epstein's house would abruptly turn into orgies initiated by either Epstein or Maxwell. Jane details that Maxwell would undress along with others, while Epstein would get on a massage table, leading to acts including oral sex and intercourse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity