the house
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Communicative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Contact communication |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | The House passed a $4.6 billion emergency spending bill for the humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-M... | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001126.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not attempting to evade arrest but was following established security protocols in response to what her security guard mistakenly identified as an ambush by the press. It further explains that a cellphone was wrapped in tin foil to prevent press access after a court inadvertently released her number, not to evade law enforcement, citing her continued use of the phone and ownership of another, uncovered primary phone as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, regarding Case 21-770. Defense counsel is arguing before a judge regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's 'risk of flight' status. The defense contends that Maxwell's use of tinfoil or Faraday bags was to prevent phone hacking, not to destroy evidence, and describes a security sweep where agents confirmed with a security guard that Maxwell lives at the house and relies on the guard for groceries.
DOJ-OGR-00001059.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding (dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues that the government is misrepresenting the circumstances of their client's arrest to influence the judge and media. The attorney details that the client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell based on the description) was in pajamas with one security guard, the doors were unlocked, and she moved to another room as a safety protocol rather than attempting to flee when FBI agents raided the property.
DOJ-OGR-00021043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell) where the judge is ruling on sentencing guidelines. The judge overrules an objection, finding by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, who is identified as a 'knowing participant in the criminal conspiracy.' The ruling cites testimony from Larry Visoski, David Rodgers, and Carolyn, as well as flight records and a household manual, to establish the defendant's leadership role as 'Epstein's number two.'
DOJ-OGR-00021035.jpg
A page from a court transcript (likely the sentencing hearing in US v. Maxwell, filed in the 2023 appeal) debating sentencing enhancements. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that testimony from pilots proves Maxwell had supervisory authority over Sarah Kellen within the conspiracy. Defense attorney Everdell rebuts that Maxwell's presence while Kellen scheduled 'massage appointments' does not constitute supervision. The defense also mentions a 'five-point enhancement for repeated and dangerous sex offenders.'
DOJ-OGR-00018937.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) discussing the admissibility of spiral-bound message pads used by household staff. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues these are valid business records created under strict instructions from the defendant, while the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) counters that many messages are undated and unsigned, though noting Ms. Hesse's messages were 'well maintained.'
DOJ-OGR-00018934.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) argue over the admissibility of message slips. The prosecution asserts these records prove a victim named 'Carolyn' contacted 'the house' during the conspiracy, while the defense argues the slips lack dates and signatures and cannot be fully authenticated by the current witness (Hesse).
DOJ-OGR-00018933.jpg
This page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and the Judge regarding the admissibility of phone message logs. The prosecution argues these logs are business records that corroborate victim testimony about calling 'the house' to schedule massage appointments. The document specifically notes that the name of a victim who testified the previous day appears in these messages.
DOJ-OGR-00018709.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She describes the routine of visiting Epstein's house, going upstairs to his bathroom to set up a massage table, and removing her clothing. She testifies that while she initially kept her underwear on during massages, this eventually changed to her being 'fully nude.'
DOJ-OGR-00018639.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney. The questioning focuses on clarifying the source of certain photographs, with the attorney confirming that Meder's testimony was that the photos were taken from CDs, not from a wall where they might have been displayed in a house.
DOJ-OGR-00018638.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. The questioning centers on whether Meder knew the specific locations within a house where certain CDs were found, particularly a closet on the third floor. Meder confirms he did work for the government related to the CDs but repeatedly states that while he knows the CDs were found in the house, he does not recall the exact locations.
DOJ-OGR-00018468.jpg
Excerpt from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Rohrbach seeks clarification from the Judge regarding testimony about a search of the New York residence. The discussion confirms that while the government will not introduce physical exhibits of nude photos or photos of Epstein with celebrities, the witness is permitted to testify about observing these items and 'nude artwork' in the house.
DOJ-OGR-00002002.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not attempting to evade arrest. It explains that her retreat to a safe room was a standard security protocol initiated after her guard mistook approaching FBI agents for the press. The document further contends that she wrapped a cellphone in tin foil to prevent press access after her number was leaked, not to evade law enforcement, citing that the phone was registered to her charity and that she used another, uncovered phone as her primary device.
DOJ-OGR-00030568.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript where an unidentified speaker ('A') recalls the names of several women associated with an unnamed man ('him'). The speaker lists names including Jody, Donna, Virginia, Lana, Allison, and Dina, identifying some as massage therapists who traveled with the man and gave him massages on his plane. The speaker also mentions their own role in supplying massage oils and identifies another woman, Nadya Jorlin, as a friend who is now a soap opera star.
DOJ-OGR-00030562.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which a witness describes visits by young girls to a house. The witness states the girls typically came at night, had dinner, and went to the movies, and that they did not know their names. The witness also clarifies the layout of the property, noting their living quarters were separate and that new guest quarters were built in 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00030558.jpg
This document is page 11 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00030558) of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness, likely a housekeeper, is being questioned about cleaning a specific room in a house. The witness describes cleaning up 'hot oil,' 'neck vibrators with long handles,' and a large volume of towels (40-50 per day). When asked if they suspected sexual activity beyond massages occurred, the witness states they 'imagine' so based on the cleanup, but never witnessed anything directly due to closed doors.
DOJ-OGR-00030555.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness describes their work and living situation for an unidentified man. The witness states that they and a partner handled all chores (cleaning, cooking, driving) and stayed at the man's house when he was in town due to the demanding schedule. The man did not allow anyone else in the house, and the witness would return to their own apartment when he was away.
DOJ-OGR-00021579.jpg
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a legal argument about whether an individual named Maxwell had supervisory authority over another person named Kellen. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues to the judge that pilot testimony and the fact that someone was present while Kellen scheduled massage appointments is insufficient evidence to prove a supervisory role. The discussion also touches upon sentencing enhancements for sex offenders.
DOJ-OGR-00017196.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (rebuttal by Prosecutor Ms. Comey) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues against the defense theory that victims fabricated stories for financial gain, pointing out that victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie disclosed details about Maxwell to the FBI and personal confidants (Dave Mulligan, Matt, Sean) years before any compensation fund existed (specifically citing 2006 and 2007). The text details specific allegations, including Maxwell touching Annie's breasts during a massage and Carolyn identifying Maxwell by her hair and accent.
DOJ-OGR-00017156.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript containing the closing argument (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that metadata presented by forensic expert Stephen Flatley does not prove Maxwell wrote specific incriminating documents, as flight logs show she was not in the location ('the house') where the desktop computer was located when those documents were created. The defense suggests multiple people had access to the computer.
DOJ-OGR-00017115.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. She challenges the prosecution's case by questioning the credibility of an alleged victim named Jane and disputing the government's proposed motive for Ghislaine's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. Menninger portrays Epstein as a manipulator who deceived those around him, including Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00017071.jpg
This document is a page from the government's summation (by Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor highlights travel logs from 2000 and 2001 showing Maxwell and Epstein traveling with a 17-year-old Virginia Roberts. The argument also connects entries in Epstein's 'black book' and message pads from 2003 to a 16-year-old girl named Carolyn and her boyfriend Sean, as well as a 16-year-old named Melissa.
DOJ-OGR-00017062.jpg
This document is a page from the closing summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor discusses the recruitment of a victim named Carolyn, connecting her to Virginia Roberts. The text references testimony from Juan Alessi (referred to as 'John'), who described driving Maxwell near Mar-a-Lago when Maxwell ordered him to stop the car so she could approach and recruit a young Virginia Roberts.
DOJ-OGR-00017047.jpg
This document is page 26 of a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that the testimony of a victim named 'Jane' is corroborated by the physical description of a massage room and the testimony of Juan Alessi. Alessi confirmed Jane's young age (14-15), her presence at the house, and that he transported her to and from school and to the airport with Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017036.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's summation in a trial against 'Maxwell'. The prosecutor argues that a warning in a household manual for staff to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb' was intended to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' she and Epstein were committing. The prosecutor also introduces the argument that Maxwell used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls, citing victims by name and referencing the testimony of an expert psychologist.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity