| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alessi's wife
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner (Q)
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Palm Beach house
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Jane
|
Driver passenger |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
the defense
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Unspecified past interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Break-in and Theft | Mr. Epstein's house (Lake r... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Mr. Alessi regarding Ms. Maxwell's use of the telephone directory. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell visited Mar-a-Lago for potential treatment. | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Alessi waited outside Mar-a-Lago for about an hour. | Outside Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alessi picked up Ms. Jane from West Palm Beach and drove her to Epstein's home. | West Palm Beach to Epstein'... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alessi leaves Epstein's employment due to sickness and fatigue. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Alessi moved to Florida. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Alessi began working for Jeffrey Epstein after being self-employed for 1.5 years. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of massage therapists. | Legitimate hotels | View |
| N/A | Daily routine | Mr. Alessi prepared breakfast for Mr. Epstein at 5:00 in the morning. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony from four witnesses (Carolyn, Jane, Kate, Mr. Alessi) regarding... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Alessi testified about the physical appearance, contents, and updating of telephone directori... | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Trip | Mr. Alessi went to a house at night to get money when no one was home, as described in his prior ... | the house | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Mr. Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, with an objection from Ms. Come... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Gathering | Testimony describes recurring events where 50 to 100+ people, allegedly hired to give massages, w... | the house | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Alessi gave testimony about quitting his job, having money problems, and taking money from Mr... | court | View |
| N/A | Theft | Mr. Alessi went into Jeffrey Epstein's house and took $6,300 in $100 bills. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Court testimony / cross-examination | Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines Mr. Alessi about his prior sworn testimony regarding his supervisors,... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | A questioner (Q) conducts a direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi (A), regarding his recogn... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interaction | Ms. Maxwell gave a booklet to Mr. Alessi. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Task | Mr. Alessi removed pictures of Ms. Maxwell from a house at the direction of Mr. Epstein. This hap... | the house | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting between the questioner and Mr. Alessi that occurred prior to the phone call being discu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Alessi previously testified about the victim, which was followed by a cross-examination sugge... | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Alessi provided testimony explaining that Exhibit 52 was not the same as books he saw during ... | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding where the Defense objects to the authentication of exhibit GX 52 by witness Mr... | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument given by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. She argues for the credibility of several witnesses, including Juan Alessi and the ex-boyfriends (Matt, Dave, Shawn) of other female witnesses, stating they have no motive to lie. Comey highlights corroborating evidence, such as flight records showing minors Jane and Virginia on Jeffrey Epstein's planes and Alessi's own admission of stealing from and repaying Epstein, to bolster their testimony against the defendant.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger. She argues that the jury should hesitate to convict due to a lack of credible evidence, pointing to inconsistencies in testimonies, the timing of changed stories relative to the opening of a victims' compensation fund, and the absence of physical proof like photographs or financial records. The speaker repeatedly uses the phrase 'That should make you hesitate' to emphasize her points about the weakness of the prosecution's case.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell was not Epstein's 'right-hand woman' in all matters and that Epstein actively kept secrets from her, including relationships with other women like Frances Jardine, Celina Midelfart, and Sherry Lewis. The text cites testimony from staff (Mr. Alessi, Cim) and flight logs to demonstrate that Epstein often traveled without Maxwell and removed her photos when other women were present.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's summation in a trial against 'Maxwell'. The prosecutor argues that a warning in a household manual for staff to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb' was intended to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' she and Epstein were committing. The prosecutor also introduces the argument that Maxwell used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls, citing victims by name and referencing the testimony of an expert psychologist.
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was fully aware of and managed the abuse in Epstein's Palm Beach home, citing a 2002 document authored by 'G. Max' listing massage oils, and testimony from Mr. Alessi regarding the cleaning and storage of sex toys in Maxwell's closet.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the 'conscious avoidance' theory, stating that instructions to lie about age came from Virginia, not Ms. Maxwell. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach counters by citing testimony from Mr. Alessi regarding Maxwell recruiting at legitimate hotels, suggesting she may have confused underage girls with adults.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the concept of 'conscious avoidance,' stating that the core issue is a factual dispute regarding the ages of alleged victims (specifically Jane and Kate) and whether the defense had any interaction with another individual named Carolyn. The defense cites testimony from Mr. Alessi stating he only saw two underage-looking individuals at Epstein's house, contrary to the inference of 'hundreds' of underage women.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, a lawyer named Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony for the judge, stating that three witnesses—Carolyn, Jane, and Kate—all testified that they had told Ms. Maxwell their age. He also recounts the testimony of another witness, Mr. Alessi, who said he saw Ms. Roberts and Jane at a house and believed them to be under 18, which is relevant to the issue of the defendant's knowledge of the witnesses' ages.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a topless photograph of an unnamed victim. The prosecution argues the photo corroborates testimony that the victim was a minor involved in the conspiracy, citing flight logs showing she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell at age 17. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger objects, citing photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi (House Manager) suggesting the victim was an adult (met in 2001/2002) when the events occurred.
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or trial transcript. It discusses a flight on May 9th, 1997, from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and questions whether Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jane were passengers on that flight.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of evidence under Rule 803.6 (Business Records). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that record-keeping practices were inconsistent after Mr. Alessi left in 2002, contradicting testimony by Alessi and Ms. Hesse. The discussion specifically concerns the admissibility of Western Union money transfer records.
This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Court and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach discuss the admissibility of government exhibits linking Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) to Mar-a-Lago through her father, Sky Roberts. The prosecution argues that Sky Roberts' employment records at Mar-a-Lago corroborate testimony that Maxwell met Virginia Roberts there.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details an investigation into Juan Alessi following a complaint from his estranged wife, Marie Alessi, regarding violations of a no-contact order. Detectives interviewed Marie, who described their separation and recent sightings of Juan, before calling Juan in for an interview at the station. The report concludes with the detective questioning Juan about his connection to a Mr. Epstein.
This document is a transcript of a legal rebuttal by Ms. Comey, dated August 10, 2022. She argues for the credibility of several witnesses, including Juan Alessi and the ex-boyfriends (Matt, Dave, Shawn) of female accusers, stating they have no motive to lie. Comey highlights that Alessi's testimony is corroborated by external evidence, such as flight records confirming that minors named Jane and Virginia flew on Jeffrey Epstein's planes.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The attorney attacks the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, citing his inconsistent memory regarding dates (1994 vs 1999) and disputing the frequency with which he drove 'Jane'. The text then transitions to discussing the defense's expert witness, Dr. Loftus, a memory scientist intended to challenge the reliability of memories presented in the case.
This document is a partial court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring a summation by Ms. Menninger in a case related to Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Menninger argues that Ghislaine was Epstein's "right-hand woman" and culpable for his actions, presenting evidence from flight logs and witness testimonies that Epstein frequently traveled with other women, such as Frances Jardine, Celina Midelfart, and Sherry Lewis, to locations like Palm Beach, often without Ghislaine. The document emphasizes Ghislaine's alleged knowledge and involvement in Epstein's activities despite claims of being kept in the dark.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the closing summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The text focuses on a restrictive household manual that warned employees to 'see nothing, hear nothing,' which the prosecution argues was designed to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also highlights a repeating pattern or 'playbook' Maxwell used to exploit multiple victims, specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
This document is page 12 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, involving the sentencing or factual findings regarding the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The judge overrules objections to Paragraph 55, stating the record supports that the defendant recruited a minor, Virginia, for sexualized massages with Epstein and was aware of the nature of the acts. The text also details that the defendant instructed Virginia to show another minor, Carolyn, 'what to do,' and that monetary incentives were used to encourage Virginia to recruit Carolyn.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| 2009-09-08 | Received | Unknown (Victim) | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Total amount stolen by Alessi across two incide... | View |
| 2009-09-08 | Received | Unknown (Victim) | Mr. Alessi | $1,500.00 | Partial amount of the theft (one of two times). | View |
Agreement requiring Alessi not to talk to anybody about Epstein's or Maxwell's lives.
Mr. Epstein would instruct Mr. Alessi to remove pictures of Ms. Maxwell from the house before other women arrived. Mr. Alessi refers to this as a 'mandate'.
Witness questioned on whether Maxwell's instructions originated from Epstein.
Prior testimony confirming Maxwell went to Mar-a-Lago for treatment and Alessi waited outside for an hour.
Testified that he was supposed to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb'.
Questioning regarding whether Alessi followed a specific manual and knowledge of 'the countess'.
Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.
Questioning regarding the age of masseuses and whether the witness met a person named Carolyn.
A declaration document sent to Alessi for signature.
Questioning regarding the identity of two females seen at Epstein's Palm Beach house.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity