| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
This document fragment, dated April 2, 2012, appears to be part of a larger narrative or correspondence produced for House Oversight. It recounts a discussion regarding the situations in Israel and Iran, culminating in the author being invited to the White House for lunch to continue the conversation.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It recounts his confrontations with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during the Durban Conferences in Geneva (2009) and New York (2010), including an incident where he was removed from a hotel and another where he walked out of a speech. The text also includes harsh criticisms of the United Nations and various countries (including Norway, South Africa, and Russia) for their stance on Israel and human rights.
This document appears to be page 335 of a manuscript or book included in a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017422). The text provides a critique of human rights organizations, specifically Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, accusing them of anti-Israel bias and ignoring abuses by authoritarian regimes like Iran. A substantial footnote details a confrontation between the author and Amnesty International researcher Donatella Rovera regarding a 2005 report on honor killings, where the author challenges the lack of statistical data linking such violence to Israeli occupation.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. In the text, Dershowitz discusses his philosophy on criminal defense, explaining why he represents guilty clients and referencing his past work on high-profile cases like Claus Von Bulow and O.J. Simpson. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document is page 87 of a memoir or historical book, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (027935), indicating it was gathered as evidence in the Epstein investigation. The text is a first-person narrative recounting the geopolitical and military escalation leading up to the Six-Day War in 1967, specifically detailing the author's recall to the elite Sayeret Matkal unit under Uzi Yairi. While the text describes historical events involving Levi Eshkol and Gamal Abdel Nasser, the document's relevance to Epstein likely stems from the author's identity (likely Ehud Barak, a known Epstein associate and former Sayeret Matkal commander) or its presence in Epstein's personal library/files.
This document is page 39 of a book or memoir (likely by Ehud Barak, given the Mishmar Hasharon reference often associated with him) contained within House Oversight files. It details the history of the 1956 Suez Crisis (Sinai War), discussing the military actions of Battalion 890, the political miscalculations of Ben-Gurion regarding British and French power, and the intervention of the US and Soviet Union. It concludes with a personal reflection from the author about how the war touched them directly at Mishmar Hasharon.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or book (page 12) included in House Oversight evidence. The text, written by a senior Israeli figure (likely Shimon Peres based on context), critiques Prime Minister Netanyahu's rhetoric on Iran and terrorism, arguing it reflects a 'diaspora mindset' rather than Zionist strength. The author invokes David Ben-Gurion's principles of strength and righteousness as essential for Israel's future.
This document appears to be page 11 of a book draft or manuscript, likely written by a former Israeli leader (context suggests Ehud Barak based on the Camp David reference). The text discusses the geopolitical situation of Israel, the aftermath of the Arab Spring, the Iranian nuclear threat, and internal Israeli political divisions. It critiques Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu for using fear to win elections and references the author's own military and government experience.
This document is page 10 of a text, likely a memoir by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (evidenced by the mention of returning as Defense Minister in 2007 and commanding Netanyahu in Sayeret Matkal). The text discusses the geopolitical instability of the Middle East, the failure of the Camp David peace talks, and the internal political dynamics between Barak, Netanyahu, Lieberman, and Bennett regarding the future of Israel. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in a document production for a US congressional investigation.
This document contains a forensic extraction log of five messages sent on May 26, 2019, from the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The messages discuss geopolitical events, including the departure of 'May' (likely Theresa May), Iraqi opposition to Iran sanctions, and the reaction of an unnamed male figure ('He') who the sender claims will view the situation as 'employees against mgmt'. The document is marked with a House Oversight Bates number.
This document is a log of electronic messages from May 8, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an address associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers disparate topics including legal concerns mentions of 'contempt perjury' and 'pardon', geopolitical commentary on Iran and 'Shia', and scheduling a meeting in Berlin for the 11th or June. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is a digital message log from May 8, 2019, obtained by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual discussing geopolitical issues involving Trump and Iran, sharing a Daily Beast article. The conversation shifts to business logistics, mentioning a requested meeting in Berlin on the 15th involving 'Terje' and 'Steve,' and a discussion about a 'structure for Dan and group.'
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log between 'jee' (associated with email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. Spanning May 7-8, 2019, the conversation includes a personal comment ('You were strong , I was beat') and the sharing of news links regarding Robert Kraft's legal issues and the Iran nuclear deal. The document is stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027695.
This document is a forensic log of electronic messages from December 2, 2018, extracted from the account 'jeeitunes@gmail.com', a known alias of Jeffrey Epstein. The exchange is between Epstein and a redacted individual, featuring political commentary criticizing Donald Trump's negotiation skills (comparing the game 'Go' to 'tick tack tow'). Notably, Epstein claims that Peter Navarro (Trump's trade advisor) called him the previous night regarding 'Chinese panic' and 'American cave', suggesting Epstein had access to high-level political figures regarding US trade policy.
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee files, dated October 24, 2018. It captures a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and redacted individuals discussing news headlines regarding Donald Trump, Iran, the Supreme Court, and migrant caravans to be passed to an editor. The exchange concludes with Epstein inquiring about a trip to Paris involving 'FW' (possibly initials or Fashion Week).
A transcript of digital communications from October 9, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses high-profile geopolitical figures and scandals, specifically mentioning Zamel, Nader, Erik Prince (Prinz), Oleg Deripaska, 1MDB, MBS (Mohammed bin Salman), and various countries involved in global conflicts or corruption. The tone suggests a discussion about widespread culpability ('Fingerprints everywhere') and chaotic geopolitical situations ('So deeply fucked up').
This document contains a log of electronic messages from September 28, 2018, primarily from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) to a redacted recipient. The conversation covers global economic stability, the strength of the US dollar versus failed socialism in other regions, and specifically discusses Elon Musk's legal troubles with the SEC, with Epstein asserting Musk should not run a public company. Epstein also offers 'talking points' to the recipient.
This document is a log of electronic messages from September 17, 2018, sent primarily by 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email alias linked to Jeffrey Epstein). The messages contain political commentary defending a 'duly elected official' (implied to be Trump), comparing Trump to Lincoln, and discussing crime in Chicago and family separation policies. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee production.
This document page, marked with a House Oversight footer, contains a transcript of an interview between 'TB' and 'DP' discussing Middle Eastern geopolitics. The conversation focuses on the Syrian civil war, with 'DP' arguing against U.S. intervention, describing the conflict as being between 'the bad and the worse.' The text also alleges that the Sept 11 Benghazi meeting between U.S. and Turkish ambassadors was for arranging arms shipments to Syria via Turkey.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript of an interview between 'TB' and 'DP' (likely Daniel Pipes), marked with a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text discusses the historical reaction of the Muslim world to Western advancement since Napoleon's 1798 invasion of Egypt, distinguishing between the faith of Islam and the modern political movement of 'Islamism' which the speaker dates to the 1920s. The speaker argues that Islamism is causing alienation within the Muslim world (citing Iran) and predicts it will not last as a major global force.
This document appears to be a page from a briefing book or news compilation (stamped House Oversight) containing geopolitical analysis. The top section discusses Egyptian-Iranian relations and the decline of American influence in the region, referencing a meeting between Morsi and Ahmadinejad. The main article, sourced from Al-Monitor and written by Adnan Abu Amer, analyzes Hamas's internal conflict regarding the potential recognition of Israel and the two-state solution.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis article or report (bearing a House Oversight footer) discussing US foreign policy in the Middle East circa 2013. It covers the US withdrawal from Iraq, the reduced military presence in the Gulf due to budget cuts, the Syrian civil war, and the relationship between the US, Egypt (under the Muslim Brotherhood), and Iran. It specifically speculates on the role of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani and the potential for a diplomatic shift between the Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian leadership.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical briefing or article (likely from early 2013) analyzing the domestic and foreign policy challenges facing Iran and Egypt. It discusses Ahmadinejad's waning power in Iran, Morsi's economic crisis in Egypt, and the broader Sunni-Shia divide involving Saudi Arabia and Syria. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production.
This document page, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027108, contains text from two news articles. The first segment discusses Obama's diplomatic approach to adversaries, specifically Iran. The second is an article from 'The National' dated Feb 8, 2013, analyzing the diplomatic visit of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Cairo to meet Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, noting the historical significance as the first such visit since 1979.
This document appears to be a page from a political article or briefing paper analyzing U.S.-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations, sanctions, and the political stalemate between the Obama administration and Congress (circa 2013). It references the Council on Foreign Relations and Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearings. While stamped with a House Oversight mark typical of the Epstein document dumps, the specific text on this page concerns geopolitical strategy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity