| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Clara Moran
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI Analyst (Redacted)
|
Professional collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient (USANYS)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This document contains a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Haddon, Morgan & Foreman; Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence details disputes and arrangements for reviewing 'highly confidential' materials, including over 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, as well as physical evidence stored at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx. Specific items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, a stuffed dog, cash held at Federal Plaza, and various electronic recording media.
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger) from March 2021. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a review of 'highly confidential images' and physical evidence at 500 Pearl Street, as well as the production of indices listing items seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutor clarifies which items are indexed in spreadsheets versus search warrant returns and coordinates a phone call to discuss these matters.
This document is an email chain between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Scarola identifies a victim who was molested in Florida beginning at age 14 and received lingerie gifts from Epstein. The correspondence coordinates a potential meeting between federal investigators and the victim in Florida.
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The correspondence details disputes over the location of the review (FBI Bronx Warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), specifically concerning 'bulky' items such as massage tables, plaster busts, and framed art which the government refused to transport. Significant discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials, including approximately 2,100 nude or obscene electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which required specific viewing conditions on non-networked laptops due to their nature.
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) coordinating interviews for several Epstein victims. The correspondence discusses scheduling around a 'victims' meeting' on October 23, 2019, and visa/passport issues for a specific victim who was 'brought to the US by Epstein a number of times.' The emails also mention a set of sisters, one of whom had already been interviewed by the SDNY.
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and a likely bank representative regarding JPMC account documents for Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence provides a summary table listing Maxwell's roles (President, Treasurer, Authorized Signer) for various entities including Hyperion Air, Freedom Air, and JEGE Inc. It also details a specific transaction from October 1999 where $18.3 million was transferred to Maxwell from the Financial Trust Company account, sourced from the sale of a JP Morgan money market fund.
This document is an email chain from August 2, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Defense Counsel regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details a dispute over whether specific discovery materials, including statements to law enforcement and cell site data, should be filed under seal or publicly with redactions. The prosecution accuses the defense of violating a protective order by publicly filing sensitive exhibits, while the defense discusses logistical issues regarding getting the defendant's affidavit signed at the MCC without the legal team acting as witnesses.
This document is a series of emails from July 2019 between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the SDNY/FBI regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence coordinates a 'reverse proffer' meeting where the government intends to persuade Bachner's female client to cooperate to avoid potential arrest. Bachner explicitly notifies the government that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege if called to testify before a Grand Jury.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
I’m logged on remotely while waiting for my flight and am happy to file the bail reply letter if the final version is ready and [Redacted] is still tied up.
Submitting a warrant application (2019.07.07_Media_SW.pdf) for consideration. Mentions Special Agent affiant is available.
Stating that if the application is ready by 11:00 PM she will review it tonight, otherwise it should go to Judge Pitman tomorrow.
Request for a call after reviewing the attached search warrant draft.
Submission of a search warrant application during a court holiday.
Transmission of attachment: 2019.07.05_New_York_Residence_SW.pdf
Submission of a search warrant application for a New York residence during a court holiday.
Requesting a meeting to discuss a forfeiture question relating to a property in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Mentions availability of sender and 'Ted'.
Requesting Epstein's most recent SORNA registration documents. Notes that current records are from April 2018 and suspects he may have registered in the last two months.
Sharing analysis of phone and flight records from 2004
Requesting FBI check files for subpoenas, 302s, and phone records related to specific redacted numbers and individuals. Requests a workup on a female subject.
Sender informs recipient of a quarterly meeting about Human Trafficking issues where 'She' may ask about Epstein. Sender asks if there is anything particular to convey besides generalities.
Please see the attached preservation request.
Good afternoon, Please see the attached preservation request. Thank you,
Requesting a brief call to touch base about a few items, acknowledging recipients are busy preparing for Wednesday.
Confirmation that files from a disc provided by an individual/agents have been saved to the DOJ network drive under the USvEpstein investigation folder.
Notification that FOIA documents are saved at a specific network path: \\Usa.doj.gov\cloud\NYS\StAndrews\Shared\USvEpstein-2018R01618\Investigation\FBI--FOIA
Materials attached.
Sharing Miami Herald article link and asking for insight regarding cooperation in a financial fraud case.
Denial of advisory opinion request because it concerns past conduct and legal questions; provides general discussion of Rules 4-7.4, 4-4.2, and 4-3.4.
Request regarding violation of Rule 4-7.4 when contacting victims per statutory obligation.
Shared a link to an Above The Law article regarding a civil suit involving Maximilia Cordero.
Confirming extension of subpoena compliance deadlines to May 29, 2007 and clarifying legal representation.
Referenced in the response letter; concerned subpoenas.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity