MS. VILLAFANA
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
FBI Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A GRAND JUROR
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Special Agent [REDACTED]
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A session of a grand jury where a witness is questioned by Ms. Villafana and a grand juror about ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A portion of a grand jury proceeding where the prosecution clarifies the relevance of travel evid... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A witness is questioned by a grand juror and Ms. Villafana about airport codes and a specific tel... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony regarding Operation Leap Year | Grand Jury Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury testimony regarding a summary chart of Jane Does. | Grand Jury Room | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Telephone Conference | Remote/Telephone | View |
EFTA00014100.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2008 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Jack Goldberger and Roy Black). The correspondence concerns the finalization of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically clarifying language about his 'imprisonment' versus 'community control' and confirming where he would serve his time (PBC Detention Center/Jail vs. Stockade). The emails reveal that prosecutors were working with '5 girls' for a Grand Jury, that there was surprise regarding a lack of press coverage, and that law enforcement officials ('The Chief') were contacting victims regarding the upcoming plea hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00004690.jpg
This document is a page from a grand jury testimony transcript (filed 05/25/21) where Ms. Villafana questions a witness regarding evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness affirms that Epstein paid a female associate $100 to recruit other girls. The witness then introduces a specific carbon copy message pad recovered during a state search warrant execution, dated March 11, 2003, which documents a call from a redacted individual.
DOJ-OGR-00004680.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned by a grand juror and Ms. Villafana about airport codes (ISM, PBIA, PBI) related to a subject's travel to the Palm Beach County area. The questioning also references a specific telephone call made on April 23, 2004, between two redacted individuals, as part of the 'Overt Acts' being discussed.
DOJ-OGR-00004679.jpg
This document is a transcript from a grand jury testimony filed on May 25, 2021. In the excerpt, a juror questions the relevance of travel itineraries, prompting Ms. Villafana to explain that the travel dates directly correlate with the dates the subject of the investigation met with victims. This connection is presented as key to understanding the 'travel count' in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00004678.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury testimony transcript (filed May 25, 2021). A witness, likely an FBI agent, testifies about a 'Merged Flight Manifests Chart' created by the FBI based on data obtained via subpoenas issued to Jeffrey Epstein's pilots. The testimony clarifies aircraft identifiers, noting that 'Hyperion' refers to the Gulfstream and 'JEGE' refers to the Boeing 727, and mentions Overt Acts 191 through 225.
DOJ-OGR-00004671.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury transcript filed in May 2021. A Grand Juror points out a discrepancy in a date of birth and activity range for a redacted individual, noting the activity range listed as 1988-2003 seemed problematic given the birth date. The witness clarifies it was a typo and the start date should be 1998. The witness mentions they have prepared a summary chart regarding various 'Jane Does' and will be discussing them.
DOJ-OGR-00004669.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript of a grand jury testimony, filed on May 25, 2021. The testimony reveals that subpoenas were issued to Amazon.com, Federal Express, and theaters to obtain order, shipping, and ticketing records. A witness explains to a grand juror that this information was gathered not to establish a defendant's location, but as 'corroborating evidence' for testimony previously provided by individuals referred to as 'the girls'.
DOJ-OGR-00004666.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Grand Jury proceeding filed on May 25, 2021. It depicts the swearing-in of an FBI Special Agent (name redacted) based in West Palm Beach. The agent confirms involvement as a case agent in 'Operation Leap Year' and testifies that additional subpoenas have been issued and documents received in response.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012132.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008, arguing that a new New York-based Grand Jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein violates his September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the NPA protects associates like Leslie Groff and [Redacted], and asserts that the new investigation is a 'fishing expedition' lacking federal jurisdiction (internet luring, travel, etc.). The defense claims that statements from three principal accusers (names redacted) actually undermine the prosecution's case and deny essential elements required for federal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
RE: Notice of Non-Compliance
Confirming telephone conference and that state plea agreement complies with federal non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity