Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Curry

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
1
Events
3
Documents
3
Also known as:
Juror in Curry v. Lynch
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Defense Counsel in Curry v. Lynch
Business associate
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2020-04-30 N/A Denial of bail in United States v. Curry. S.D.N.Y. View
2009-01-01 Legal case In Curry v. Lynch, an argument was rejected that a juror had implied bias because he owned a prin... Second Circuit View
2009-01-01 Court case Curry v. Lynch, where the Second Circuit rejected an argument that a juror had implied bias becau... Second Circuit View

DOJ-OGR-00001625.jpg

This document is page 15 of a Government memorandum filed on July 13, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The prosecution argues against granting bail, citing that the MDC is adequately handling COVID-19 risks and referencing legal precedents where bail was denied despite the pandemic. A footnote emphasizes the Government's position that the defendant has the financial means to flee the country and that pandemic travel restrictions would not prevent her flight.

Court filing (government memorandum)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009146.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against a finding of implied bias for 'Juror 50'. It outlines the Second Circuit's established 'narrow' view on the matter, citing multiple precedents where the court refused to presume bias based on occupational relationships or personal experiences without a showing of actual prejudice. The document asserts that the current circumstances involving Juror 50 do not meet the high threshold for mandatory disqualification set by the Second Circuit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009825.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against excusing 'Juror 50' for implied bias. It heavily cites Second Circuit precedent, which maintains a 'narrow' view on the matter, requiring more than just similar personal experiences or occupational relationships to presume bias. The document asserts that the circumstances of Juror 50 do not meet the high threshold for mandatory disqualification established by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search