Epstein estate
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government (USAO)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-22 | N/A | Court Order (ECF No. 63) inviting the Epstein Estate to state its position. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | George filed civil enforcement action under CICO Act against Epstein estate. | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | AG George filed civil enforcement action (CICO) against Epstein estate. | Virgin Islands | View |
EFTA00019129.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 9, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and officials likely from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Weinstein requests a call to update them on a 'new development' regarding the Epstein Estate. The respondents discuss a deadline that day and the logistics of the call, with one official noting they are reviewing images slowly.
EFTA00018108.pdf
This document is an email dated January 29, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email discusses updating a 'sharing order application' (likely a Rule 6(e) application based on the filename) to include additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys. The sender asks colleagues to review the descriptions of these new materials.
EFTA00018078.pdf
This document is an email chain from late January 2020 among US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff discussing a 'Sharing Order' related to the Epstein case. The correspondence concerns the accurate description of recently received materials from Epstein's estate attorneys, specifically regarding wills, 'Trust Two' documents, revocations, and a '2019 Trust'. The team discusses whether to include specific documents and how to properly characterize them in a legal application (likely a Rule 6(e) application based on the file attachment name).
EFTA00018020.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry for a conference call scheduled for April 5, 2021. The call participants include Andy Tomback and Marc Weinstein, with the specific subject noted as the '(Epstein estate)'. The record indicates the meeting was accepted and classified as 'X-PERSONAL', occurring well after Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting estate administration or legal proceedings.
EFTA00018019.pdf
This document is an email notification dated March 31, 2021, indicating the acceptance of a scheduled call. The call involves an individual from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and representatives Andy Tomback and Marc Weinstein, specifically noting their connection to the 'Epstein estate'.
EFTA00016286.pdf
This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00015846.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Audrey Strauss and other Assistant U.S. Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a draft letter to the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (also trustees of the 1953 Trust Agreement). The prosecutors discuss seeking a waiver of attorney-client privilege from the estate to assist with their discovery review and production process.
EFTA00015823.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
EFTA00013258.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2020 regarding the privilege review of the 'Epstein SW [Search Warrant] returns' database. The participants discuss identifying and segregating privileged communications, specifically flagging emails related to attorney Jack Goldberger and materials from private investigators, including Roy Black, to determine if they are protected by attorney-client or work-product privilege.
EFTA00011147.pdf
This document is an email chain between USANYS officials from January 29, 2020, discussing a 'Sharing Order' application. The officials are coordinating the description of new materials received from Epstein's estate attorneys, specifically 'trust and will documents.' They debate whether to explicitly mention 'revocations' in the order, ultimately deciding to include them despite questioning their substantive value.
DOJ-OGR-00015176.tif
This document is a page from a General Release agreement, detailing the terms under which a 'Releasor' is settling claims against 'Releasees', likely related to the Epstein Estate. It outlines confidentiality provisions under the EVCP Protocol, the dismissal of legal actions by the Releasor, and states that the document represents the full understanding between the Releasor and the Co-Executors of the Epstein Estate.
DOJ-OGR-00015175.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal General Release agreement, likely related to a settlement or compensation claim. It details the 'Releasor's' waiver of rights, authorization for information disclosure to 'Epiq' for resolving liens (Medicare/Medicaid), and the 'Epstein Estate's' responsibility to pay negotiated amounts for resolved claims. The Releasor is granting this release voluntarily in exchange for a Compensation Offer and has received legal advice.
DOJ-OGR-00015174.tif
This document is a General Release related to claims against Mr. Epstein, the Epstein Entities, and the Epstein Estate (collectively, 'Releasees'). It broadly releases all claims, including those related to acts of sexual abuse by Mr. Epstein, regardless of their geographic origin. The document also notes that the Releasor is familiar with California Civil Code Section 1542 regarding unknown claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008243.jpg
This page from a legal filing (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues against admitting a statement made by attorney Glassman to the Government on August 17, 2021, regarding his client 'Jane'. The Government contends the statement has minimal impeachment value because Jane's civil cases were already dismissed and she had been paid by the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund prior to the statement. Additionally, the Government argues that admitting the statement risks violating attorney-client privilege regarding Glassman's advice to Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00019454.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court order filed on September 14, 2020, discussing 'The Interests of the Court' regarding a motion to stay a civil case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The court reasons that staying the civil case favors judicial economy because the parallel criminal case (presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan) may resolve common factual issues and involves strict protective orders that complicate civil discovery. The text references letters from the Government and Moskowitz regarding these discovery limitations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity