Tommy Mottola
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioned about social connection |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioned association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged victim plaintiff indirectly |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Tommy Mottola was noticed for a deposition by a law firm representing an Epstein victim. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013472.jpg
This document is a page from a legal affidavit responding to Jeffrey Epstein's allegations of improper discovery practices. The author justifies noticing Bill Clinton, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson for depositions by citing specific evidence: Clinton's extensive flight history and contact info found in Epstein's directory; Copperfield's frequent visits and an allegation of improper touching by a victim; and Richardson's presence at the New Mexico ranch and return of campaign donations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013383.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing arguing that an attorney named Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that Edwards had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and testimony from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—regarding Epstein's abuse of minor girls. It specifically notes that these individuals were considered 'friends' of Epstein believed to possess relevant information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013367.jpg
This legal affidavit (likely by a victims' attorney) defends the issuance of deposition notices to high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson. The document details evidence justifying these notices, including flight logs linking Clinton to Epstein's co-conspirators, housekeeper testimony placing Copperfield at Epstein's home where abuse occurred, and pilot testimony placing Richardson at the New Mexico ranch. It also notes that Richardson returned campaign donations from Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013498.tif
This document details allegations made by Epstein and counter-arguments regarding improper discovery and deposition notices in civil cases. It highlights Epstein's connections with prominent figures like Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson, often in the context of alleged child exploitation, sexual abuse, and flight logs. The document also mentions the return of campaign donations by Bill Richardson from Epstein, suggesting a desire to distance himself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013491.tif
This document discusses the significance of a taped conversation between George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting its uniqueness as evidence against Epstein's molestation claims and his perjury. It also lists several high-profile individuals as Epstein's acquaintances and notes Epstein's intention to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights at trial, making the tape critical for plaintiffs like Jane Doe. The document details the difficulties in obtaining discovery from Epstein due to his legal tactics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029320.jpg
This legal document, dated September 12, 2013, outlines attorney Edwards' defense against Epstein's claims of improper litigation tactics. Edwards asserts he had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and depositions from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—believing they possessed relevant information regarding Epstein's alleged sexual assaults. The document argues these individuals were identified as Epstein's 'close friends' and that seeking their testimony met the legal standard for discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript related to a lawsuit identified as 'Epstein versus RRA'. An unidentified witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Scarola, asserts their 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under 18. The witness objects to a subsequent question about Tommy Mottola, accusing a 'Mr. Edwards' of introducing irrelevant names to damage the witness's personal relationships.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity