HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
1.12 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript
File Size:
1.12 MB
Summary
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript related to a lawsuit identified as 'Epstein versus RRA'. An unidentified witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Scarola, asserts their 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under 18. The witness objects to a subsequent question about Tommy Mottola, accusing a 'Mr. Edwards' of introducing irrelevant names to damage the witness's personal relationships.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE WITNESS | Deponent |
An unidentified individual being questioned under oath. The witness asserts their Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment ri...
|
| MR. SCAROLA | Attorney / Questioner |
The attorney conducting the deposition and asking questions of the witness.
|
| MR. PIKE | Attorney |
An attorney present at the deposition, likely representing the witness, who makes objections ('Form') to questions.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Subject of questioning |
The witness is asked if they ever socialized with him in the presence of females under the age of 18.
|
| Tommy Mottola | Subject of questioning |
The witness is asked if they ever socialized with him.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Attorney (Opposing) |
Mentioned by the witness as the person who allegedly brought irrelevant names (like Tommy Mottola) into the case to '...
|
| Epstein | Litigant |
Mentioned as a party in a lawsuit, 'Epstein versus RRA'.
|
| Sandra Townsend | Court Reporter |
The individual who electronically signed the transcript, associated with PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. |
The court reporting firm that transcribed the deposition.
|
|
| RRA |
An entity mentioned as the defendant in a lawsuit brought by Epstein ('Epstein versus RRA'). The full name is not pro...
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears as a document identifier in the footer, possibly indicating the source is a collection from a House Oversight...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Not specified
Deposition of an unidentified witness regarding a lawsuit referred to as 'Epstein versus RRA'. The witness is questioned about their associations with Alan Dershowitz and Tommy Mottola.
Not specified
Relationships (4)
Question from Mr. Scarola: 'Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18?'
Question from Mr. Scarola: 'Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola?'
The witness accuses Mr. Edwards of bringing irrelevant names into the case to 'imperil my relationships with social friends'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Sir, at least here today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
Quote #1
"This is the type of questions where people who have nothing to do with this case whatsoever have been brought into the case by Mr. Edwards in an attempt to simply imperil my relationships with social friends and serves as an example of why this case has been brought against Mr. Edwards and his firm, sir."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
Quote #2
"And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus RRA?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,243 characters)
Page 90
1 friend.
2 Q. Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz
3 in the presence of females under the age of 18?
4 MR. PIKE: Form.
5 THE WITNESS: Sir, at least here today, I'm
6 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth
7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights.
8 BY MR. SCAROLA:
9 Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola?
10 A. This is the type of questions where people who
11 have nothing to do with this case whatsoever have been
12 brought into the case by Mr. Edwards in an attempt to
13 simply imperil my relationships with social friends and
14 serves as an example of why this case has been brought
15 against Mr. Edwards and his firm, sir.
16 MR. PIKE: Form as well.
17 BY MR. SCAROLA:
18 Q. Well, do you know who brought those persons'
19 names into this lawsuit?
20 MR. PIKE: Form.
21 And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I
22 believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus
23 RRA?
24 BY MR. SCAROLA:
25 Q. Yes, sir, that's the lawsuit I'm talking
2 Q. Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz
3 in the presence of females under the age of 18?
4 MR. PIKE: Form.
5 THE WITNESS: Sir, at least here today, I'm
6 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth
7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights.
8 BY MR. SCAROLA:
9 Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola?
10 A. This is the type of questions where people who
11 have nothing to do with this case whatsoever have been
12 brought into the case by Mr. Edwards in an attempt to
13 simply imperil my relationships with social friends and
14 serves as an example of why this case has been brought
15 against Mr. Edwards and his firm, sir.
16 MR. PIKE: Form as well.
17 BY MR. SCAROLA:
18 Q. Well, do you know who brought those persons'
19 names into this lawsuit?
20 MR. PIKE: Form.
21 And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I
22 believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus
23 RRA?
24 BY MR. SCAROLA:
25 Q. Yes, sir, that's the lawsuit I'm talking
(561) 832-7500 PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. (561) 832-7506
Electronically signed by Sandra Townsend (401-377-676-2895)
Electronically signed by Sandra Townsend (401-377-676-2895)
Electronically signed by Sandra Townsend (401-377-676-2895)
1ddcfb84-b324-4437-a670-765e29067145
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document