U.S. District Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court filing / appeal record transmission | Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files... | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Stamper case decision | Western District of North C... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001531.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It records a sealed docket entry for the "Arrest (Removal) of Ghislaine Maxwell" in case number 1:20-mj-00132-AJ. The notice explicitly states that because the case is sealed, no electronic public or participant notices were distributed.
DOJ-OGR-00000877.jpg
This document is an electronic filing notice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021. It informs recipients that the appeal record for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, has been electronically transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The notice also includes important information regarding PACER access fees and the policy for obtaining free electronic copies of court documents for legal professionals.
DOJ-OGR-00000829.jpg
This is a legal form filed on August 5, 2019, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the criminal case 'United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein' (Docket 19-2221). The form was completed by Epstein's attorney, Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP, to state that he is not ordering a court transcript. The reason provided is that a 'Daily copy' is already available.
DOJ-OGR-00000778.jpg
This document is a criminal docket entry from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, for case # 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, titled 'USA v. Epstein,' filed on July 2, 2019. It identifies Jeffrey Epstein as Defendant (1) and lists five attorneys representing him, along with their respective law firms and contact information. Judge Richard M. Berman is assigned to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000326.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Weingarten, Weinberg, and Fernich) requested permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. Judge Richard M. Berman hand-wrote an order on the page granting the motion and requiring the materials be hand-delivered to chambers and opposing counsel by 9:00 AM the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00000277.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 6) dated July 11, 2019, outlining proposed bail conditions for Jeffrey Epstein. It details a substantial bond package secured by his $77 million Manhattan home, his private jet, and properties owned by his brother Mark Epstein and friend David Mitchell. The document also notes that Epstein sold a second private jet in June 2019 and proposes strict house arrest conditions including 24/7 monitoring by trustees.
DOJ-OGR-00021047.jpg
This document is a receipt from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It confirms a $505.00 credit card payment made by Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' related to case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00020594.jpg
This is a 'Criminal Appeal Transcript Information' form filed on July 15, 2022, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The form, submitted by attorney John M. Leventhal for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426), indicates that a transcript of court proceedings is not being ordered.
DOJ-OGR-00020588.jpg
A receipt from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It documents a payment of $505.00 made by Bobbi C. Sternheim via credit card for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' on behalf of (FBO) Ghislaine Maxwell regarding case 20CR330-1 AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00020579.jpg
This document is a receipt from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It confirms a $505.00 credit card payment made by Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee'. The transaction is associated with case number 20CR330-1 AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00002046.jpg
This is a character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The redacted author expresses shock at Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, claims never to have witnessed inappropriate behavior, and argues strongly for her release on bail so she can prepare her defense for a trial anticipated in July 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00021948.jpg
This document is page 7 of 8 from a court filing (Document 9) dated November 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (related to the prosecution of Epstein's guards, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas). It displays a map outlining the jurisdictional boundaries of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Eastern District of New York (EDNY), listing the specific counties included in each district. There are handwritten notes in the bottom right corner that appear to read 'DNO' and 'EDPA'.
DOJ-OGR-00021201.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the structure and function of the U.S. Department of Justice and its key components. It details the mission of the Department, the role of the 94 U.S. Attorney's Offices in prosecuting federal crimes, and the oversight structure involving the Attorney General. The text also highlights specialized units within the Criminal Division, such as the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), and their role in assisting federal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00019633.jpg
This page is from a legal brief (Case 20-3061, Document 82) filed on October 2, 2020. The text argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt to use a writ of mandamus to modify a Protective Order, citing that such writs are 'extraordinary remedies' reserved for exceptional circumstances like judicial abuse of power. It references legal precedents (Cheney, Glotzer) to support the argument that pretrial discovery orders are generally not reviewable on direct appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00019234.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, filed on July 6, 2020. It details a sealed docket entry made on July 2, 2020, regarding the "Arrest (Removal) of Ghislaine Maxwell" in case number 1:20-mj-00132-AJ. The notice explicitly states that due to the sealed nature of the case, no public or email notifications were distributed.
DOJ-OGR-00010517.jpg
This page from a forensic-psychiatric report details Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints regarding her confinement at the MDC since July 2020. It documents allegations of sexual harassment by guards (specifically a breast grab in Jan 2021), sleep deprivation due to 15-minute flashlight checks justified by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and physical deterioration including weight loss and hair loss. The report notes a decline in her mental state from coherence in Oct 2020 to manifesting depressive symptoms over time.
DOJ-OGR-00009195.jpg
This document page is a 'Table of Authorities' section (specifically page 'v') from a court filing dated February 24, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists citations for the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, noting they are referenced on pages 1, 6, and 23 of the full brief. The page bears a Department of Justice Office of Government Information Services Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00009195).
DOJ-OGR-00009189.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Reuters article printed on January 26, 2022. It details the controversy surrounding juror 'Scotty David' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who revealed in an interview that he was a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he may not have disclosed during jury selection (voir dire). The U.S. Attorney's office wrote to Judge Alison Nathan requesting an inquiry into his service, potentially threatening the verdict. The text also details testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding payments from Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019747.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant, Judge Alison J. Nathan as the presiding judge, and lists the five attorneys representing Maxwell. It also provides the contact information and law firm affiliations for each attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019695.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal representation, including five attorneys from various law firms. The case is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00017275.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the final moments of the trial before jury deliberations began, including the dismissal of alternate jurors, the swearing-in of a U.S. Marshal to safeguard deliberations, and the official start of deliberations at 4:49 p.m. Ms. Williams is identified as a court official managing logistics for the jurors and exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00010222.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a witness or potential juror regarding a jury selection questionnaire they completed on November 4, 2021. The inquiry specifically focuses on question 48, which pertains to whether the individual, their friends, or family have ever been victims of sexual harassment or assault.
DOJ-OGR-00009874.jpg
This page is the 'Constitutional Provisions' section of a Table of Authorities from a court filing (Document 644) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists citations for the U.S. Constitution Amendments V and VI, referencing pages 1, 6, and 23 of the full brief. The document bears a DOJ bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00009853.jpg
This document is the final page (6 of 6) of a court exhibit filed on March 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the conclusion of a news article, likely from 'The Independent,' which quotes an unidentified man asserting Maxwell's knowledge of illicit activities and notes that her sentencing schedule has not yet been determined. The page includes website navigation elements and a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00009735.jpg
This document is a page from a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues for a new trial based on the alleged dishonesty of Juror No. 50 during voir dire, specifically regarding social media usage (Twitter/Instagram) and a failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The defense draws a parallel to Juror No. 55, who was dismissed for cause after similar dishonesty regarding Twitter was discovered.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity