U.S. District Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court filing / appeal record transmission | Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files... | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Stamper case decision | Western District of North C... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009725.jpg
This document page is from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It presents legal arguments regarding juror misconduct and the standard for obtaining a new trial, citing the Supreme Court case *McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood*. The text quotes concurring opinions by Justices Blackmun and Brennan to argue that a juror's intentional dishonesty is not strictly required to order a post-trial hearing on bias.
DOJ-OGR-00002961.jpg
This document is page 27 (marked xxvi) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It contains a 'Table of Authorities' listing legal statutes, rules (Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence), and other academic or congressional authorities cited in the brief. The page includes a DOJ Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002961).
DOJ-OGR-00005841.jpg
This document is page 58 of a legal filing (Document 397) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It details a legal dispute regarding discovery, specifically the defendant's repeated requests for the Government to identify uncharged co-conspirators and their statements. The text outlines a history of motions (Dkt. Nos. 293, 297, 317, 320, 331) where the defense sought this information and the Government's opposition to identifying specific co-conspirator statements within their production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.jpg
This document is an email sent by David Schoen on March 26, 2019, sharing a Fox News article about the death of a 96-year-old U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein. The email highlights Epstein's description as a 'Clinton-connected financier and sex offender.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012042.jpg
This document is a news report or summary (stamped House Oversight) detailing the conclusion of a lawsuit between InfoSpan (led by Farooq Bajwa) and Emirates Bank. The dispute centered on a failed mobile payment technology deal ('SpanCash'), leading to criminal complaints in Dubai, the detention of Bajwa's partner Larry Scudder, and subsequent U.S. litigation involving high-profile law firms Boies Schiller & Flexner and Latham & Watkins. The document highlights the involvement of David Boies' firm, which is likely the nexus for its inclusion in files related to larger investigations involving Boies or Epstein-adjacent legal matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017787.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for Exhibit 6, filed on April 16, 2019, as part of legal case 1:19-cv-03377. It contains a Bates stamp indicating it is part of records associated with the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017760.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the inherent power of courts to appoint counsel for indigent victims. It cites various legal precedents (such as Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co.) to argue that victims require legal representation to ensure a fair process, as neither prosecutors nor defendants prioritize victim rights. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted by Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) as part of congressional inquiries or legal arguments regarding victim representation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017999.jpg
This document is a legal cover sheet designating the following content as 'Exhibit 8'. It indicates the document was filed on April 16, 2019, as part of civil case 1:19-cv-03377, and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017999.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017988.jpg
This document is a cover page for 'Exhibit 4' filed on April 16, 2019, in federal case 1:19-cv-03377. It bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017988', indicating it is part of a document production related to a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029418.jpg
This document is the final page (page 3) of a legal complaint filed on May 25, 2017, against the FBI for violating the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The plaintiff, represented by attorney Daniel Novack, alleges the FBI failed to respond to a request by Mr. Robertson regarding an individual (implied to be Epstein) who received preferential treatment due to wealth and connections. The plaintiff seeks a court order compelling the FBI to produce the requested documents and pay attorney fees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029407.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a civil complaint filed on May 25, 2017, against the FBI. The plaintiff, Mr. Robertson (represented by attorney Daniel Novack), alleges the FBI violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by failing to respond to a request for records, presumably regarding Jeffrey Epstein (referenced implicitly regarding 'preferential treatment'). The plaintiff seeks a court order to compel the release of documents and expedited proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021742.jpg
This document is a news article excerpt, marked as House Oversight Committee evidence, detailing the scrutiny surrounding Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafaña regarding the non-prosecution agreement they negotiated for Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a federal judge's ruling that the deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by intentionally withholding information from victims. The text also notes a DOJ probe launched in January into potential professional misconduct and mentions that the White House was reviewing Acosta's involvement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021732.jpg
This document appears to be a news article included in House Oversight Committee files (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021732). It details the scrutiny facing then-Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta and prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña regarding the non-prosecution agreement (plea deal) given to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights a federal judge's ruling that the prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing the deal from victims, and mentions a DOJ probe into potential professional misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021730.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a House Oversight Committee record (stamped 021730). It quotes Senior U.S. District Court Judge William J. Zloch expressing strong criticism of the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida for intentionally withholding information from the court. The text notes that Judge Zloch copied Acosta on this specific order.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity