| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court filing / appeal record transmission | Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files... | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Stamper case decision | Western District of North C... | View |
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on September 17, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida for Case 9:10-cv-81111. The plaintiff, identified only as M.J., is suing Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen for 'Sexual exploitation of a minor' and demanding a jury trial. The plaintiff is represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards.
This document is an email forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. On April 29, 2022, Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an Opinion & Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and confirming her conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six, while dismissing other counts as multiplicitous. The order explicitly mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a co-conspirator in a scheme to abuse underage girls and confirms Maxwell's sentencing date for June 28, 2022.
This document appears to be a metadata page or cover sheet for an email sent on May 3, 2021. The sender, recipient, and subject are redacted. The email contained an attachment (127129028102.pdf) referenced by a URL linking to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's electronic case files system.
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The filing is a Court Order dated December 8, 2020, in which Judge Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify regarding her conditions of confinement. The order mandates that the Government provide written updates on Maxwell's conditions, specifically regarding legal access, every 60 days.
An email thread from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan's team. The prosecutor reaches out to inform Kaplan, who represents a victim, of their client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard at Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing. Kaplan responds requesting a call, and the prosecutor provides availability via cell phone.
This document contains an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, and government prosecutors (names redacted) from July 6-7, 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics for unsealing the indictment against Epstein, his upcoming court presentation at 500 Pearl Street, and discussions regarding bail arguments and search warrant inventories. Weinberg also mentions being with attorney Reid Weingarten.
An email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (and her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard regarding Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing/release proceedings. They attempt to schedule a call to discuss whether the client wishes to make a submission or representation.
An email dated July 11, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Isidro Garcia. The email discusses the rights of Garcia's client (a victim) under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard at Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing, noting that the prosecution intends to vigorously oppose bail.
An email chain from July 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Roberta Kaplan's legal team regarding the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. The Assistant U.S. Attorney reaches out to inform victims' counsel of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Roberta Kaplan responds requesting a discussion.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (along with her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490' to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Kaplan responds briefly asking to talk.
An email dated February 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to 'MDC Conditions' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is a series of emails from an individual named Gregor Hirsch to various media outlets and government officials on December 15, 2020. Hirsch argues that beauty pageants constitute a form of sex trafficking similar to the Epstein case and petitions for Ghislaine Maxwell to be granted bail under strict security conditions he proposes. Notably, Hirsch includes a request to be employed as one of the security guards for Maxwell and alleges grooming behavior by Donald Trump at Miss Teen USA pageants.
This document is an email thread from November 22, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20CR330). A representative from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) confirms to court staff that they will be ordering a same-day delivery transcript for the Final Pre-Trial Conference (FPTC) scheduled for the following day.
An email dated November 22, 2021, from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP (representing Ghislaine Maxwell) to Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers. The email submits a letter regarding proposed limiting instructions related to a Court Opinion and Order from November 19, 2021, noting that the submission is temporarily under seal.
This document is an internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from June 18, 2019, circulating a Washington Post opinion article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein’s scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system.' The article criticizes the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of wealthy predators like Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, and Leslie Moonves, and calls for the unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's files and new investigations into Epstein's conduct in New York, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. It specifically highlights the role of David Boies in representing victims and criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for the previous non-prosecution agreement.
An email chain from November 3, 2021, regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the disclosure of juror names to counsel. The email also serves to notify recipients of Sternheim's new office address.
This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.
This document contains a chain of emails between defense attorney Martin Weinberg and federal prosecutors regarding the indictment and arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics of Epstein's initial court appearance, the unsealing of the indictment, and discussions regarding bail/detention strategies. It also touches upon the execution of a search warrant and the handling of potentially privileged materials.
This document contains an email chain from July 6-7, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, and federal prosecutors regarding the imminent unsealing of the indictment against Epstein. The emails discuss the logistics of Epstein's court presentation at 500 Pearl Street on Monday (July 8), potential bail arguments versus consent to detention, and the execution of a search warrant with concerns regarding attorney-client privilege.
This document contains an email thread from November 22, 2021, regarding the scheduling of the Final Pre-Trial Conference (FPTC) for the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20CR330). A representative from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) confirms the scheduling and requests same-day delivery of the court transcript. The FPTC was scheduled for the following day for a duration of 4 hours.
This document is an email thread from July 17, 2019, regarding the legal case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. Attorney Martin Weinberg asks an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York if an original document can be viewed the following day. The discussion centers on an attachment titled 'Passport Photographs.pdf', with the prosecutor noting that pages 6 and 7 of the passport were blank and therefore not photographed.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (including Roberta Kaplan and Jenna Dabbs). The correspondence concerns *U.S. v. Epstein* (19 Cr. 490), specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act and whether the firm's client wished to be heard regarding Epstein's upcoming bail hearing. The thread confirms a phone conversation took place between Kaplan and the AUSA, with Jenna Dabbs expressing support for the prosecution's upcoming court appearance on Monday.
This document is an email chain dated August 19, 2019, regarding the case U.S. v. Epstein. An Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York writes to Judge Berman's chambers to submit a letter motion for an order of 'nolle prosequi' (dismissal of charges), presumably following Epstein's death. Defense attorneys Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller are copied on the correspondence.
An email dated November 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (referenced as 'fling') related to an attachment titled 'Suggestion_to_Dkt_404.pdf' and provides notice of Sternheim's new office address. Recipients include co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document contains Jury Instruction No. 10 from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, summarizing the first five counts of the indictment against her. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sexual activity, enticing a specific victim named 'Jane', and conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking of minors between 1994 and 2004. The document outlines specific timeframes and victim categories (multiple victims vs. Jane) for each count.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity