| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Contreras
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. [REDACTED]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jill Shellow
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Contreras
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | N/A | Legal negotiation regarding discovery production in the Epstein case. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Discussion regarding concerns about the client (referenced as 'concerns we discussed last night'). | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Proffer session regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's death. | 1 St. Andrews (US Attorney'... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Proffer session/meeting between Johnny Contreras' legal team and US Attorney's Office. | 1 St. Andrews (likely 1 St.... | View |
| 2019-08-21 | N/A | Scheduling of Proffer Session | TBD | View |
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Attorney proffer from Andy Patel | Unknown | View |
This document is an email thread from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and an unnamed correspondent (likely opposing counsel or government prosecutor). The discussion concerns the production of interview notes regarding a client ('Mr. [Redacted]') under a protective order. The sender confirms that the client's name will be provided to defense counsel only on an 'Attorney's Eyes Only' (AEO) basis to protect their identity.
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Patel, Shellow, Yannella) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY and EDNY) regarding inmate Johnny Contreras. Contreras was housed in the MCC SHU across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. The attorneys arrange a 'proffer session' for September 3, 2019, at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, where Contreras acts as a witness willing to share his observations of the events surrounding Epstein's death, though he did not witness the hanging itself.
This document is an email chain from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and government prosecutors regarding the disclosure of information about a client of Patel's in the Epstein case context (likely related to the prison guards' prosecution). Patel argues against full disclosure, citing client safety concerns, and claims his client is not a witness but rather made an error in a statement that is 'contradicted by the surveillance video evidence.' The government proposes disclosing the client's identity to defense counsel only on an 'Attorneys' Eyes Only' (AEO) basis.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between attorneys Andrew Patel and Jill Shellow, and US Attorneys (SDNY and EDNY), regarding inmate Johnny Contreras. Contreras was housed in the SHU at the MCC across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. While Contreras did not witness the hanging, his lawyers offered his testimony regarding his 'observations,' leading to the scheduling of a proffer session with investigators.
An email chain between the US Attorney's Offices for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York regarding an offer of information from attorney Andrew Patel. Patel represents inmate Johnny Contreras, who was housed in the MCC SHU across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. Contreras offered to speak to investigators about his observations, leading to an attorney proffer on August 20, 2019.
Discussing three issues regarding the wording of a letter to the Court about producing redacted notes to the defense and AEO designations.
Sending a draft letter for Judge Torres and asking for thoughts.
Requesting a copy of the disclosure being considered for the client to help address concerns discussed the previous night.
Sending unredacted and redacted copies of notes; stating intention to produce redacted notes to defense and client name on AEO basis.
Acknowledge receipt of Patel's proposal; will review and respond early next week.
Proposing a disclosure cover letter modeled on US v. Madonna to ensure client safety. Arguing the material is not Brady/3500/Rule 16 but an error contradicted by surveillance video. Threatening to file motion for Protective Order before Judge Torres.
Sending unredacted and redacted notes. Stating intent to produce redacted copies under protective order and provide client name/contact to defense counsel on AEO (Attorneys' Eyes Only) basis.
Requesting copy of planned disclosure regarding Mr. [Redacted] to address safety concerns discussed previously.
Rejecting proposed redactions and suggesting Patel file a motion under seal before Judge Torres.
Discussing the attachment of unredacted and redacted notes. Confirms plan to produce client name and contact info to defense counsel on an AEO (Attorneys Eyes Only) basis.
Proposing a disclosure cover letter modeled on US v. Madonna; arguing the material is not Brady/3500/Rule 16; mentioning surveillance video contradicts client's error.
Requesting a copy of the disclosure being considered for Mr. [Redacted].
Confirming arrival ("We are here").
Notifying of a change of plans regarding location within the building.
Confirming meeting for 9/3 at 10 am at 1 St. Andrews.
Confirming meeting for 9/3 at 10 am at 1 St. Andrews.
Discussing setting up a proffer session limited to information regarding Epstein's death.
Confirming they spoke to SDNY colleagues handling the investigation and passed the info along.
Requesting to set up a proffer session limited to information regarding Epstein's death.
Informing Patel that the info has been passed to former colleagues in SDNY who are handling the investigation.
Confirming communication with SDNY colleagues who are handling the investigation and will reach out to set up a proffer.
Informing the government that inmate Johnny Contreras was in the SHU across from Epstein's cell during his death and is willing to speak to investigators about his observations.
Initial disclosure that inmate Johnny Contreras was in a cell across the hall from Epstein at the time of death and is willing to speak to investigators.
Informing government that Johnny Contreras was housed across from Epstein and is willing to speak to investigators about his observations.
Informing government that inmate Jhonny Contreras was housed across the hall from Epstein at time of death and is willing to speak to investigators.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity