Metro
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Amy Epstein
|
Professional contact |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Howard Swerdloff
|
Affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-11-18 | N/A | Receipt of Metro PCS subpoena results by FBI | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
EFTA00017109.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione. The proceedings focus on a motion by media organizations (NY Post, Daily News, NY Times) to unseal letters regarding Tartaglione's housing conditions at the MCC and MDC. The Judge rules against the Bureau of Prisons and orders the letters unsealed, citing the public interest in BOP conditions and the fact that Tartaglione's background (and connection to the Epstein incident) is already public knowledge. The hearing also touches on trial scheduling and the government's decision not to seek a warrant for a specific telephone.
EFTA00016177.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 3, 2020, involving a US DOJ Attaché in London. The emails discuss the UK media reaction to the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on the implications for Prince Andrew. The Attaché notes it is 'weird' that a redacted individual reached out just before the arrest occurred. The email includes a summary of headlines from major UK newspapers like the Daily Mail, which report on Prince Andrew being 'bewildered' by the lack of response from US officials.
EFTA00016118.pdf
Attorney Anthony Cecutti writes to Judge Engelmayer regarding his client, Justin Rivera, detailing ongoing issues with accessing discovery materials (via laptop) and legal counsel (via video calls) at the MCC. The letter alleges harassment by MCC staff, who referred to Rivera as 'enemy #1', and criticizes the facility's rigid scheduling. The document concludes by contrasting Rivera's harsh treatment with the extensive accommodations provided to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC (access to computers, showers, TV, and 13 hours of discovery review daily), arguing that the disparity is based on race, gender, and class.
EFTA00015804.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
EFTA00013307.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court found that Maxwell presents a significant flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, international ties (citizenship in France and UK), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The proposed $28.5 million bail package and offer to waive extradition rights were deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at trial.
EFTA00010196.pdf
This document is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government argues that a written response from MDC legal counsel is sufficient to address concerns, while the Defense argues that Warden Heriberto Tellez should appear in person to explain 'onerous' conditions such as 15-minute flashlight checks and body scans. Judge Nathan added a handwritten order at the end requiring MDC legal counsel to submit a letter by December 4, 2020, before determining if further action is needed.
EFTA00009927.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 18, 2020, from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to the Legal Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the provision of a specifically modified laptop to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center to allow her to review discovery materials for her case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter certifies that the laptop's recording (mic/camera) and communication (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Ethernet) capabilities have been disabled.
DOJ-OGR-00000143.tif
This document discusses the legal complexities surrounding a joint trial for Maxwell, specifically focusing on the potential disqualification of her attorneys due to their involvement as potential witnesses in perjury counts and the civil action. It cites legal precedents from the Second Circuit and District of Nevada regarding attorney testimony and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, highlighting the prejudice Maxwell could face given her attorneys' long-standing representation and familiarity with the case facts.
DOJ-OGR-00033198.tif
This document is a visitors' register, likely for a single day, recording individuals' names, their associated firms, and their check-in and check-out times. It contains entries for multiple people, including Howard Swerdloff, Diane LiperPay, and Alvaro Perez, across various organizations, with check-in times ranging from 6:40 to 9:52.
DOJ-OGR-00001842.jpg
This is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The parties inform the court they have been unable to reach an agreement regarding the defense's request for information on Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC. The Government proposes that MDC legal counsel submit a written response, while the defense insists that Warden Heriberto Tellez appear personally before the Court to address concerns about confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001716.jpg
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 10, 2020. The defense requests the disclosure of the identities of 'Victims 1-3' to prepare for trial and argues that Maxwell is being subjected to uniquely harsh confinement conditions at the MDC as a direct reaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in 2019. The letter details Epstein's timeline of detention and death to contextualize the extreme surveillance and isolation Maxwell is facing.
DOJ-OGR-00001708.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal filing dated August 10, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues for the disclosure of the identities of Victims 1-3 and protests the harsh confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The document explicitly claims Maxwell's treatment (isolation, 24-hour surveillance, suicide watch protocols) is a direct reaction by the BOP to the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein at the MCC in 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00001590.jpg
This is page 10 of a legal filing from July 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for release or specific detention conditions based on the high risk of COVID-19 in prisons, citing statistics and prior court rulings. It specifically notes that Maxwell was transferred to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) by the BOP on July 6, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001435.jpg
This document is a status letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated May 5, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the protocols for flashlight security checks at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), explaining that checks are generally conducted every 30 minutes in the SHU and hourly in the general population. However, the letter specifies that Ghislaine Maxwell is subject to checks every 15 minutes because she is on an 'enhanced security schedule,' though not on suicide watch.
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan providing an update on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government asserts that Maxwell receives exceptional access to discovery materials (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) via both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints regarding missing emails, stating that an investigation revealed Maxwell deleted or archived them herself, with no evidence of MDC staff misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00001355.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated February 1, 2021, regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. The Government addresses a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing over two million pages of discovery materials on weekends and holidays. While the Government does not object to the access, they defer to MDC management protocols, noting that Maxwell already receives more review time (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) than any other inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00000967.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing for the release of Ms. Maxwell, citing increased COVID-19 risks in prisons and the inability to adequately prepare a defense while detained. The text references the 'Stephens' case as a precedent where a defendant was released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) because prison lockdowns prevented necessary legal preparation.
DOJ-OGR-00020661.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY covering late April and early May 2021 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal skirmishes over Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn, specifically regarding the seizure of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and allegations of sleep deprivation caused by flashlight surveillance every 15 minutes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC and the Government to justify these actions and ensure the confidentiality of attorney-client communications.
DOJ-OGR-00020421.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing legal disputes regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn. Key issues include the seizure/confiscation of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and complaints regarding sleep deprivation caused by 15-minute flashlight surveillance checks. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC to account for the seized items, ensure confidentiality of attorney-client materials, and justify the frequency of flashlight checks.
DOJ-OGR-00002273.jpg
This document is a letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated January 25, 2021. The letter requests the court vacate a previous order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement, arguing that the facility provides her with significant access to discovery materials (13 hours/day via laptop) and legal counsel (3 hours/day), which the facility claims exceeds the time allotted to other inmates.
DOJ-OGR-00002273(1).jpg
A formal letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison Nathan requesting the vacating of a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The MDC argues that Maxwell already has significant access to discovery materials (via a dedicated laptop provided in Nov 2020) and extensive communication with her legal counsel, exceeding that of other inmates. The letter refutes defense claims that her confinement conditions are limiting her ability to prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001870.jpg
This is a letter dated October 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Warden Heriberto Tellez of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The attorney is writing on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to protest the 'extraordinarily restrictive conditions' of her detention, which are compared to solitary confinement and death row. The letter argues that these harsh measures are not a response to any threat Maxwell poses but are an overreaction by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to its failure to prevent the death of Jeffrey Epstein at a different facility.
DOJ-OGR-00019445.jpg
This document is a Memorandum and Order from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) dated September 14, 2020, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman grants a motion filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to stay the civil proceedings entirely pending the resolution of Maxwell's parallel criminal case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document notes that Maxwell is currently in custody at the MDC awaiting a criminal trial scheduled for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00019760.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from December 4-8, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail procedural disputes over sealing documents, a schedule for a renewed bail motion, and significant back-and-forth regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC Brooklyn. Judge Nathan denied a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez personally but ordered the government to provide written updates every 60 days concerning Maxwell's access to legal materials and the frequency of searches conducted on her.
DOJ-OGR-00010516.jpg
This document is a letter dated August 24, 2021, from Dr. Alexander S. Bardey of Fifth Avenue Forensics to Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, Laura Menninger and Bobbi Sternheim. Dr. Bardey outlines the process of an ongoing forensic psychiatric evaluation of Ms. Maxwell, conducted to assess her mental state and flight risk in relation to a pending bail application. The evaluation included 14 meetings with Maxwell, a review of her history and legal documents, and a collateral interview with her counsel and acquaintance, Leah Saffian.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Consumer | Metro | $27.00 | Listed price of the book 'The Age of Deception' | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity