NSA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Vanee Vines
|
Spokesperson for |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Employment former |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Contractor assignment |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Withheld information |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael McConnell
|
Former leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Former contractor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jordana H. Feldman
|
Administrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Virgin Islands Economy
|
Economic dependency |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency communication |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | An auction of Hovensa's assets was held, with assets awarded to Limetree Bay Holdings. | New York City | View |
| N/A | N/A | The NSA notified the FBI about the initial investigation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | NSA notified the FBI about the Snowden affair. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Hovensa Refinery in St. Croix closed. | St. Croix | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closing of the Hovensa refinery, which impacted the St. Croix housing market. | St. Croix | View |
| N/A | N/A | The NSA did not immediately share information with the CIA. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The assets of the closed Hovensa refinery were sold at auction. | St. Croix | View |
| 2020-10-05 | N/A | Plaintiff accepted offer of compensation. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff submitted a claim to the Compensation Program. | Unknown | View |
| 2015-06-04 | N/A | Publication of a New York Times article on the NSA's expansion of internet spying at the U.S. bor... | U.S. Border | View |
| 2015-05-05 | N/A | The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the NSA's collection of bulk data illegal. | N/A | View |
| 2014-03-07 | N/A | Edward Snowden reportedly raised concerns internally at the NSA over 10 times before 'going rogue'. | NSA | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | NSA informed Congress regarding the method of password acquisition. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2012-01-18 | N/A | The Hovensa refinery was announced to be permanently shut down, leading to job losses and an econ... | US Virgin Islands | View |
| 2012-01-18 | N/A | The permanent shutdown of the Hovensa refinery was announced, causing an economic downturn and le... | US Virgin Islands | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Closure of the Hovensa oil refinery. | St. Croix | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Closure of the Hovensa oil and gas refinery, which impacted the territory's unemployment rate. | U.S. Virgin Islands | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Closure of the Hovensa oil refinery in St. Croix, cited as a likely cause for a downturn in GDP. | St. Croix | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Stellar Wind program terminated for budgetary reasons. | USA | View |
| 2010-12-01 | N/A | Report of counterspies hunting for a Russian mole inside the National Security Agency. | U.S. | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Period mentioned where CIA, FBI, and NSA discovered they were vulnerable to penetration/insider t... | USA (implied) | View |
EFTA00021202.pdf
This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.
EFTA00019565.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00011028.pdf
This document is the draft Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, dated December 13, 2019. It establishes the rules, eligibility criteria, and administration process for victims of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse to file claims and receive compensation from the Estate in exchange for a legal release. The protocol emphasizes the independence of the Administrator (Jordana H. Feldman) from the Estate and notes that there is no aggregate cap on compensation funds.
EFTA00010010.pdf
This document is a General Release form for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP), signed on October 3, 2020, by a claimant in Travis County, Texas. By signing, the claimant accepts a monetary compensation offer (amount redacted) in exchange for releasing the Epstein Estate, The 1953 Trust, and associated entities from all liability regarding sexual abuse claims. The document includes provisions for resolving Medicare/Medicaid liens through Epiq Mass Tort and allows the claimant to disclose information about the claim at her discretion, despite the Administrator's confidentiality obligations.
EFTA00006055.pdf
This document contains informational brochures for Palm Beach County Victim Services and the Center for Trauma Counseling, followed by a Florida Bureau of Victim Compensation Claim Form. The form was filled out by a female victim (name redacted) residing in North Palm Beach who works in retail management. She signed the form on October 25, 2019, requesting compensation for expenses and wage loss, noting she is represented by legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00017754.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, including the signing and submission of a claim form with her lawyer's help. The questioner also probes her knowledge of a civil complaint against Ghislaine and whether her lawyer sent Ghislaine a letter demanding money, which the witness denies knowing about.
DOJ-OGR-00008243.jpg
This page from a legal filing (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues against admitting a statement made by attorney Glassman to the Government on August 17, 2021, regarding his client 'Jane'. The Government contends the statement has minimal impeachment value because Jane's civil cases were already dismissed and she had been paid by the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund prior to the statement. Additionally, the Government argues that admitting the statement risks violating attorney-client privilege regarding Glassman's advice to Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00008242.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), dated December 6, 2021. It argues against the defense's claim that a witness named Jane waived her attorney-client privilege regarding advice received from her lawyer, Glassman, about cooperating with the government. The text asserts that Jane did not authorize a waiver, did not testify about privileged communications, and that any statements made by Glassman to the government do not constitute a subject matter waiver for Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00020699.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020697.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 22, 2021. It lists several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including directives regarding the sealing and redaction of opinions, the denial of motions to quash a subpoena related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and memorandum opinions precluding the expert testimony of Bennett Gershman and Dr. Ryan Hall.
DOJ-OGR-00020555.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 24, 2021, for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists several filings, including letters regarding protective orders, an order for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program to produce documents, and a motion by the prosecution to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall, along with the defense's response. The docket also confirms the trial's start date of November 29, 2021, and outlines COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry.
DOJ-OGR-00020454.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing a series of court filings and orders entered on November 24, 2021. Key events include orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial procedures and COVID-19 protocols, the production of materials from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and motions filed by the prosecution (USA) to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall. The filings demonstrate active pre-trial legal maneuvering by both the prosecution and the defense just before the trial's scheduled start on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00016148.jpg
This document is page 38 of a court transcript from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines that victims, including 'Jane,' will testify about the sexual abuse they suffered, specifically highlighting the defendant's active role in grooming, touching, and facilitating the abuse alongside Jeffrey Epstein. It also addresses the fact that witnesses received financial compensation but emphasizes that the money does not negate the trauma they endured.
DOJ-OGR-00015172.jpg
This document is a claim form for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, dated June 26, 2020. It is signed by 'SM', a legal representative, on behalf of a claimant whose name has been redacted. The form was notarized by Deborah Cuffe in Broward County, Florida on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00015171.jpg
This document is page 1 of 2 of the 'Attestations/Signature Page' for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Epstein VCP). It is a legal form requiring a wet signature and notarization, wherein the claimant certifies the truthfulness of their claim under penalty of perjury and authorizes the Administrator (Jordana H. Feldman) to process the claim and resolve liens (Medicare/Medicaid). The document includes warnings against fraud and establishes confidentiality protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00019446.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 14, 2020, outlines the arguments surrounding a motion for a stay in a civil case involving a defendant named Maxwell. Maxwell requested the stay pending her criminal case, a motion supported by the Co-Executors who argued against a partial stay. The Plaintiff vigorously opposed the motion, accusing Maxwell of attempting to gain an unfair discovery advantage.
DOJ-OGR-00011725.jpg
This document is page 60 of a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that unlike the 9/11 fund, the Epstein compensation fund claims were based on 'unreliable' memories. The text focuses on an accuser named 'Jane,' describing Epstein as a 'benefactor' who paid for her professional schooling, vocal lessons, and a Wall Street apartment where she lived with her family.
DOJ-OGR-00005173.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the procedures for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how claimants can submit forms and supporting documentation to the program's Administrator, Jordana H. Feldman, in Washington, D.C. The document also describes the factors the Administrator will consider when evaluating claims, such as medical records and contemporaneous correspondence, to determine the credibility of sexual abuse allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00005172.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated September 7, 2021, outlining the Claims Submission Process for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how victims—both those who have filed lawsuits and those who have not—can register for the program via www.EpsteinVCP.com or through their attorneys. It specifies that while litigation can continue concurrently with program participation, all lawsuits must be dismissed with prejudice before accepting a compensation offer.
DOJ-OGR-00005169.jpg
This document is the 'Protocol' for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, dated May 29, 2020, and filed as a court exhibit. It details the voluntary and independent nature of the program, appoints Jordana H. Feldman as the Administrator with sole discretion over claim valuation, and states that the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein will fund the program with no aggregate cap on compensation.
DOJ-OGR-00011708.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that witness memories are faded and contaminated by media, and that Jeffrey Epstein manipulated everyone, including Maxwell. The text asserts that accusers were motivated or manipulated by civil attorneys seeking money and notes that testifying witnesses received millions of dollars from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Fund with minimal vetting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019839.jpg
This document is an 'Illustration Credits' page, likely from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the file name). It lists photo credits for images related to the Edward Snowden leaks, including photos of Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Julian Assange, and various NSA locations. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp dated September 30, 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019819.jpg
This document is page 331 of a 'Selected Bibliography' from a book or report, likely produced on September 30, 2016, and stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The content lists journalistic sources regarding Edward Snowden, the NSA, and espionage, citing publications like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Vice. The footer filename 'Epst_9780451494566...' corresponds to the ISBN for the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, suggesting this document is related to the journalist Edward Jay Epstein rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818.jpg
This document is page 330 of a selected bibliography from a book, likely produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818). The page lists various articles published between 2010 and 2015, primarily focusing on Edward Snowden, the NSA leaks, WikiLeaks, and cybersecurity. While the document bears a file name starting with 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein in a larger production batch), the text itself is entirely focused on the Snowden saga and intelligence leaks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity