Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Adversarial juror vs expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Contradictory views |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defense expert |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant expert witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial | The criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which a new trial is being requested. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-04 | Court ruling | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memo Endorsement denying the Government's request regarding witne... | Court | View |
EFTA00029180.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Attorney Nicole Simmons submits Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow for government redaction proposals.
EFTA00016268.pdf
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
EFTA00010217.pdf
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
EFTA00010184.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell trial (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons forwards a response to the government's motion to preclude the testimony of expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow the government to review for necessary redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020697.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 22, 2021. It lists several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including directives regarding the sealing and redaction of opinions, the denial of motions to quash a subpoena related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and memorandum opinions precluding the expert testimony of Bennett Gershman and Dr. Ryan Hall.
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg
This document is a log of court filings and orders from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between November 3 and November 8, 2021. The entries detail procedural matters ahead of her trial, including Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders on motions for reconsideration, jury selection logistics, and deadlines for witness-related briefings. The filings also concern motions to exclude evidence related to an alleged victim and the government's response to defense motions.
DOJ-OGR-00021133.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated Feb 28, 2023) argues that the District Court erred regarding 'Juror 50,' claiming the juror was biased and concealed information during voir dire to act as an 'unsworn expert' on traumatic memory. It cites Rule 606(b) exceptions and references a footnote contrasting expert testimony by Dr. Elizabeth Loftus (stating memory is constructed) with Juror 50's statements to The Independent (Jan 4, 2022) that abuse memories are 'replayed like a video.'
DOJ-OGR-00009020.jpg
This document details statements made by Juror No. 50, identified as Scotty David, to The Independent journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley, published on January 4, 2022. Juror No. 50, a victim of sexual assault, revealed how his personal experience and vivid traumatic memories influenced the jury's belief in Ms. Maxwell's accusers and led him to discredit the testimony of Ms. Maxwell's expert witness, Dr. Elizabeth Loftus.
DOJ-OGR-00009009.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting a new trial. The motion argues that the original trial was unfair because a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, failed to disclose during jury selection (voir dire) that he was a victim of sexual abuse and then used this personal experience to persuade other jurors to convict Maxwell. The filing claims this constitutes juror misconduct and prejudice, violating Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who testifies about her educational background at UCLA and Stanford, establishing her credentials in mathematics and psychology. The questioning focuses on the definition and contents of her Curriculum Vitae (CV) to lay the foundation for further expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009711.jpg
This legal document details a post-verdict interview given by Juror No. 50 (using the name Scotty David) to The Independent on January 4, 2022. The juror revealed that he was a victim of sexual abuse, shared this personal story with the jury during deliberations, and used his own experience to validate the accusers' testimonies. He explicitly stated that he disregarded the testimony of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on memory, influencing the jury based on his personal beliefs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity