Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Claimant beneficiary |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted individuals (present in the house)
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Beneficiary |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Financial award | A. Farmer received an award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013783.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the redirect examination of a witness named Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies that she has not coordinated her testimony with others and states her purpose for being there is to see Ghislaine Maxwell held accountable for harm caused. She also confirms that she submitted a claim to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg
This document is page 54 of a Government sentencing submission in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 22, 2022. The text argues for the imposition of a maximum $750,000 fine, notes that no forfeiture is sought due to a lack of identified property owned by the defendant used in the offense, and states that no restitution is sought because the six identified victims (Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) have already been compensated via the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund or civil settlements.
DOJ-OGR-00014574.jpg
This document is page 174 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey is delivering a rebuttal argument, refuting the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) had false memories implanted by the media, the FBI, or greedy lawyers seeking money from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey argues there is no evidence the witnesses consumed each other's media interviews or that their lawyers conspired to fabricate stories, noting specifically that Annie's lawyer worked pro bono.
DOJ-OGR-00014566.jpg
This document is a page from the rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number). Comey argues that the testimony of four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) is sufficient for a guilty verdict and refutes defense attorney Ms. Menninger's claims regarding age limits at the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey also details witness testimony corroborating that the victim 'Annie' was 16, not 17, during a trip to Santa Fe.
DOJ-OGR-00011724.jpg
This document is page 59 of a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is applying 'hindsight bias' to lawful conduct like shopping or movies, relabeling it as 'grooming.' She further argues that prosecution witnesses are financially motivated, claiming they receive money from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and enhance their payouts by cooperating with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00017587.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (sidebar conference) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger and the Judge discuss whether the witness ('Jane') understands how the jury's verdict might impact payouts from the Victim Compensation Fund. Menninger argues that the witness has already received money from the fund based on her story, and discusses the relevance of the fund to the witness's motivation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity