| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed author
|
Team member collaborator |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jaclyn Friedman
|
Co editors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Sibling |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | An online reputation management campaign was conducted to manipulate Jeffrey's Google search resu... | Online (Google, Wikipedia, ... | View |
| 2025-02-24 | N/A | Women in Film party | Cecconi's | View |
This document is a page (page 16) from a book titled 'How America Lost Its Secrets', authored by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). The text details the early life of Edward Snowden, contrasting his academic failures with his sister Jessica's success. It covers his dropping out of high school in 1998, his parents' divorce, his solitary life in a Maryland condominium, and his immersion in online gaming culture under the alias 'TheTrueHooHa'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document contains an email signature block for Lawrence Krauss at Arizona State University (ASU), followed by repeated confidentiality disclaimers. The disclaimers identify the content as the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and direct recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error. The document is marked with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025653.
An email chain from September 2015 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) and physicist Lawrence Krauss. They discuss Krauss's recent meeting with Johnny Depp, noting that both Depp and Epstein own islands in the Bahamas. Epstein suggests inviting Depp to visit them in the Caribbean, or conversely, visiting Depp on his island.
An email thread from September 2015 between physicist Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey Epstein discussing an upcoming trip to the Caribbean. Krauss mentions he has been traveling with 'Johnny' (identifiable as Johnny Depp via context clues about his island, movie, and band with Alice Cooper) and notes that Depp and Epstein are the only two people he knows who own islands. Epstein suggests they could visit Depp on his island during their trip.
An email thread from December 2010 between Jeffrey Epstein and Al Seckel regarding reputation management and SEO services. Epstein disputes escalating fees (10k/month), while Seckel defends the costs by describing a 'cyber war' with the Daily Beast, efforts to manipulate Wikipedia and Google results, and the use of bots to suppress negative articles. Seckel also urgently requests to speak with Epstein regarding 'the island thing'.
This undated document is a status report to 'Jeffrey' (presumed to be Epstein) from a contractor managing his online reputation. The report details successful efforts to manipulate Google search results and 'hack' his Wikipedia page to remove negative information like 'convicted sex offender' and replace his mug shot. The contractor also discusses ongoing challenges, an outstanding payment of $7500 to a technical vendor named Mike, and the need for a decision on the project's continuation.
This undated report, addressed to Jeffrey (presumed Epstein), details an extensive online reputation management campaign. The author describes successes in manipulating Google search results by suppressing negative articles and 'hacking' Wikipedia to remove pejorative terms and replace his mugshot. The document also outlines financial arrangements with a contractor named Mike and questions whether Jeffrey wishes to continue funding the project.
This document is a page from an essay or book about sex positivity, consent, and sexual ethics. It advocates for the equal rights of sexual minorities and the decriminalization of sex work, and advises against hierarchical thinking in sexuality, using 'polyvangelism' as an example. While the document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it is part of a governmental record, its text contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity