| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
US delegations
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Analyst subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
KKR & Co
|
Financial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
BNP
|
Corporate structure |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nizar Bin Obaid Madani
|
Professional official |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ZTE
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SinoVision
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Harrison
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Ching
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | US Attorney for the Virgin Islands opens investigation into Jeffrey Epstein Estate and Southern C... | US Virgin Islands | View |
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | US Attorney's Office for the Virgin Islands announces opening of investigation into Jeffrey Epste... | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | ZTE signed a contract with lobbying firm Mercury Public Affairs one day after a Trump tweet. | United States | View |
| 2017-08-06 | N/A | Cancellation of Singapore Permanent Residence (SPR) Status for Huang Jing and Yang Xiuping | Singapore | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | First Forum on the Global Chinese Language Media | Unknown | View |
| 0005-07-29 | N/A | The 5th Circuit upholds an IRS win in the Strangi case, a Texas FLP case. | Texas | View |
An email chain from September 21, 2007, involving attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez attempting to finalize a plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Sanchez emails a vacationing official claiming they are ready to sign, but internal emails between (presumably) prosecutors or DOJ officials express confusion and dismissal, stating Sanchez has 'not been in any negotiations' and referring to her as 'yet another cook.'
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2020, originating from attorney John Ray of Ray, Mitev & Associates. Ray sent information regarding Jeffrey Epstein to a redacted recipient. Subsequent emails in the chain show the recipients discussing forwarding this correspondence to the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
An email thread from March 10, 2020, between First Bank's legal requirements department and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena (Case #19353) related to Jeffrey Epstein. First Bank provides a list of accounts and notes they are working on document production for the case.
This document is a formal statement by forensic accountant Preston M. Faro, owner of Preston M. Faro & Associates Inc. Faro was hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to independently verify a 'Financial Condition Report' prepared by Macalvins Accountants regarding the assets of Ghislaine Maxwell and her husband for the period 2015-2020. Faro details his extensive background in fraud investigation with the IRS and FBI before concluding that the Macalvins report is a complete and accurate summary of Maxwell's financial assets.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to FirstBank Puerto Rico. Although the cover letter is dated December 31, 2019, the subpoena itself is dated August 11, 2019 (the day after Jeffrey Epstein's death). It demands the production of all financial records, including 'Know Your Customer' files, statements, and transaction logs, for Jeffrey Epstein and the entity LSJE LLC from January 1, 2005, to the present, citing federal sex trafficking and conspiracy statutes.
An email thread from April 2020 involving unidentified parties discussing a subpoena related to FirstBank Puerto Rico. One participant attaches a subpoena document, while previous emails coordinate a phone call and reference working from home due to pandemic restrictions. The attachment filename suggests it relates to a document dated December 31, 2019.
This document contains a Department of Justice 'MEGA4 Automated Litigation Support System Account Request and Approval Form' specifically for the case 'US v. Epstein' (DJ Number 2442-0129). Attached to the request form is a 7-page policy document titled 'Rules of Behavior (ROB) for General Users Version 7.0', dated January 3, 2014, which outlines IT security protocols for DOJ employees. The specific individuals requesting or approving access are redacted.
This document is an email chain initiated by Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Davis O'Brien on September 8, 2019, inquiring about Jeffrey Epstein's Virgin Islands-based charity 'Gratitude America.' The reporter highlights a $10 million grant from Leon Black's foundation, missing donations, and a Deutsche Bank account held by the charity. The emails discuss SDNY's scrutiny of Epstein's banking relationships and potential expansion of the investigation into financial crimes.
This document is a series of emails from whistleblower Chris Dilorio to redacted recipients (likely SEC or government officials) between April and May 2019. Dilorio alleges a massive money laundering scheme involving Environmental Solutions Worldwide (ESWW), Apollo Global Management, Leon Black, and Jeffrey Epstein. He further claims that the SEC is complicit in these frauds and notes a 'quid pro quo' arrangement where an SEC investigation into Apollo was dropped after a meeting between Apollo's Joshua Harris and Jared Kushner, followed by a large loan to Kushner's business. Dilorio also reports receiving anonymous threats.
This document is a 2005 W-2 Wage and Tax Statement for an employee of NES LLC (a company associated with Jeffrey Epstein, located at 457 Madison Ave). The employee, whose name is redacted but lived on Singer Island, FL, earned $175,323.09 in wages for the year 2005. The document details federal and state tax withholdings, as well as a $10,000 contribution to a SIMPLE IRA.
This document is a formal letter from the French Ministry of Justice to the U.S. Department of Justice, dated March 9, 2021. It clarifies French legal provisions (Articles 696 et sq., 696-2, and 694-4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) regarding the removal of individuals. The letter emphasizes that removal is not granted for individuals who possess French citizenship at the time of the offense, making their French nationality an "insuperable obstacle" to removal.
This legal document page discusses a bail hearing for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It recounts that the Court initially found her financial disclosures incomplete but notes she has since provided a more detailed report from a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, covering 2015-2020. Despite the new report, which was also reviewed by a former IRS agent, the Court remains unpersuaded that the proposed bail package, secured by property, cash, and bonds, would reasonably assure her appearance in court.
This document outlines a preliminary statement arguing for the release of Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell on strict bail conditions. It highlights her substantial bail package, including a bond signed by her spouse and support from seven sureties, while contesting the government's opposition as being based on her association with Jeffrey Epstein rather than legal standards.
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell has addressed the court's concerns about her finances, which were raised at an initial bail hearing. Her defense counsel hired a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, to conduct a thorough five-year financial analysis, and a former IRS Special Agent and Certified Fraud Examiner reviewed and validated this analysis as complete and accurate. The purpose is to demonstrate financial transparency to the court to establish suitable bail conditions.
This legal document is part of a court filing by Ms. Maxwell's defense team, presenting new information to support a renewed bail application. The defense provides several pieces of evidence, including a letter from her spouse, character references from friends and family, and a detailed financial report from the firm Macalvins Limited showing assets of approximately $22.5 million. The filing aims to demonstrate Ms. Maxwell's strong ties to the U.S. and counter arguments that she is a flight risk or was hiding from law enforcement.
This document is the preliminary statement of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It outlines new information not present at her initial hearing, including details on family ties in the US, a financial report covering her and her spouse, extradition waivers for the UK and France, and arguments against flight risk. Maxwell asserts her innocence, claims the government's case relies on uncorroborated testimony from 25 years ago, and requests release to prepare her defense.
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, critiques Mr. Epstein's proposed bail package, arguing that his home confinement plan involves excessive judicial oversight and raises practical concerns about private security. It also dismisses the defense's offer of an anticipatory extradition waiver as an 'empty gesture,' citing the Department of Justice's view that such waivers are not binding and the risk of the defendant fleeing to a non-extradition jurisdiction.
This document, dated September 7, 2002, is a list titled "PB New Shampoo and Massage products". It enumerates various shampoo and massage products from a wide range of cosmetic and personal care brands. The document is marked as "GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 420" and includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number, indicating it was collected as evidence in a legal proceeding.
This page from a legal filing argues that Perjury Counts against Ms. Maxwell should not be joined with Mann Act Counts under Rule 8(a) because the connection is illogical, and that they should be severed under Rule 14(a) to prevent substantial prejudice. The defense contends that the perjury charges stem from confusing questions in a separate defamation lawsuit and that a joint trial would improperly force the re-litigation of that civil matter.
This page from a legal filing argues that Perjury Counts against Ms. Maxwell should not be joined with Mann Act Counts under Rule 8(a) because the connection is illogical, and that they should be severed under Rule 14(a) to prevent substantial prejudice. The defense contends that the perjury charges stem from confusing questions in a separate defamation lawsuit and that a joint trial would improperly force the re-litigation of that civil matter.
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. The text argues legal standards for the 'Severance of Offenses,' citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14 and various precedents regarding when charges should be tried separately to avoid prejudice to the defendant. It lists numerous case citations including U.S. v. Mitan, U.S. v. Bradford, and U.S. v. Burke to support the argument that misjoined counts must be severed.
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the 'Severance of Offenses' under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14, citing various precedents to argue that counts should be severed if joinder prejudices the defendant. It discusses the legal standards for 'misjoinder' and 'substantial prejudice' required to grant a motion to sever.
This document is a Table of Authorities page (Page 3 of 19) from a court filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists twenty-one legal precedents (cases) cited in the brief, primarily from the Second Circuit and D.C. Circuit, covering dates from 1964 to 2011. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002281.
This legal document, part of a court filing from December 30, 2020, discusses a bail application for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It recounts that the Court initially found her financial disclosures incomplete, but she has since provided a more detailed report from a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, and a review by a former IRS agent. Despite the new information, the Court remains unpersuaded that the proposed bail package, secured by $8 million in property and $500,000 in cash, would reasonably assure her appearance in court.
This document is page 17 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, denying bail conditions for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the defendant's proposed bail package, including $8 million in property, $500,000 in cash, and bonds co-signed by friends and family, supported by a financial report from UK firm Macalvins analyzing her assets from 2015-2020. Despite the submission of new financial data and verification by fraud examiners, the Court remains unpersuaded that the package reasonably assures her appearance.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-30 | Paid | IRS | Ohio Lawmakers | $60,000,000.00 | Alleged bribe to arrange a $1 billion bailout. | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity