IRS
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
US delegations
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Analyst subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
KKR & Co
|
Financial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
BNP
|
Corporate structure |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nizar Bin Obaid Madani
|
Professional official |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ZTE
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SinoVision
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Harrison
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Ching
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | US Attorney for the Virgin Islands opens investigation into Jeffrey Epstein Estate and Southern C... | US Virgin Islands | View |
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | US Attorney's Office for the Virgin Islands announces opening of investigation into Jeffrey Epste... | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | ZTE signed a contract with lobbying firm Mercury Public Affairs one day after a Trump tweet. | United States | View |
| 2017-08-06 | N/A | Cancellation of Singapore Permanent Residence (SPR) Status for Huang Jing and Yang Xiuping | Singapore | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | First Forum on the Global Chinese Language Media | Unknown | View |
| 0005-07-29 | N/A | The 5th Circuit upholds an IRS win in the Strangi case, a Texas FLP case. | Texas | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002211(1).jpg
This document is a preliminary statement arguing for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bail, detailing a proposed bond package secured by her and her spouse's net worth and backed by seven additional sureties. The defense argues that Maxwell is being held to an unfair standard due to her association with Jeffrey Epstein and contends that the government's evidence is weaker than represented.
DOJ-OGR-00001993.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Motion for Bail) arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell has now provided a thorough review of her finances for the years 2015-2020, addressing previous court concerns. Defense counsel retained UK accounting firm Macalvins to analyze bank statements, tax returns, and FBAR filings for Maxwell and her spouse. This report was further validated by a redacted former IRS Special Agent with 40 years of experience in financial fraud.
DOJ-OGR-00001982.jpg
This legal document is part of a renewed bail application for Ms. Maxwell, submitted by her defense team. It presents new evidence to the Court, including letters of support from her spouse and friends, a detailed financial report from Macalvins Limited showing assets of approximately $22.5 million for a proposed bond, and statements to counter the government's narrative that she was a flight risk. The defense argues this new information, unavailable at the initial hearing, demonstrates her strong ties to the U.S. and justifies her release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001979.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, filed on December 14, 2020, in support of a renewed motion for her release on bail. The memorandum argues that new information, including evidence of US family ties, a detailed financial report, and irrevocable waivers of extradition from the UK and France, addresses the court's previous concerns about flight risk. It also attacks the weakness of the government's case and proposes an 'expansive set of bail conditions' to ensure her presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00022087.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on April 24, 2020, involving the prosecution of prison guards (specifically defendant Thomas) related to the events of August 9-10, 2019 (Jeffrey Epstein's suicide). The Government argues against Thomas's request for BOP records regarding staffing shortages and prior instances of falsified records, asserting that the BOP was not part of the prosecution team and therefore the Government is not obligated to search BOP files under discovery rules. The text cites legal precedents (U.S. v. Bryan, U.S. v. Volpe) to support the limitation of 'government' to only those agencies participating in the specific investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009267.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad regarding their service in a trial involving defendant David Parse. The questioning probes Conrad's impartiality, focusing on a post-verdict letter, their initial belief in the defendant's guilt, and whether their own past criminal history (including arrests for DUI and shoplifting) biased their judgment. Conrad consistently affirms that their final decision was based solely on the evidence and Judge Pauley's legal instructions, and that their personal history did not affect their ability to be fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00009230.jpg
This document is page 'vi' of an index of exhibits from a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists various documents by exhibit number, including emails, faxes, letters, Deutsche Bank client statements, and an IRS certificate, with dates ranging from 1999 to 2009. The index provides a brief description, date, and the corresponding page number in the case file for each item, detailing communications between multiple individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00010207.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from March 18, 2013, argues for a significant prison sentence for an individual named Parse. It details his central role as a Deutsche Bank representative in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving multiple co-conspirators and fraudulent tax shelters, which generated over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and caused over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document highlights that Parse earned over $3 million in commissions for his indispensable role in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010179.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 22, 2022. An unnamed speaker argues that Mr. Parse's implementation of end-of-year financial transactions was a knowing and criminal act to obstruct the IRS, not a simple mistake. Another speaker, Ms. Davis, addresses the judge, referring to additional evidence submitted in a written briefing.
DOJ-OGR-00010178.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the content appears to stem from a separate tax fraud case involving Deutsche Bank (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas/Parse). The text details a closing argument or legal submission regarding 'tax shelter transactions' designed to defraud the IRS, specifically highlighting the roles of Deutsche Bank employees Mr. Parse and Carrie Yackee, and referencing testimony from Paul Daugerdas' secretary. The argument asserts that Parse and Yackee were the only ones at Deutsche Bank who knew the 'full picture' of the fraud.
DOJ-OGR-00010176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney, Ms. Davis, argues that there is overwhelming evidence of defendant Mr. Parse's criminal involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud via backdated transactions. She also contends that his background as a CPA is relevant to proving his intent. The transcript also references another attorney, Mr. Shechtman, and the testimony of Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein regarding their knowledge of a juror, which they allegedly tried to conceal from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00010153.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists publications by Stephen Gillers from 2003 to 2006. The articles, published in various newspapers and legal journals, cover topics such as judicial ethics, the Martha Stewart trial, and judicial nominations including those of Miers and Alito. Several publications were co-authored with D. Luban, S. Lubet, and Deborah Rhode.
DOJ-OGR-00009984.jpg
This document is a page from a legal hearing transcript dated February 22, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00038-AEN. It lists the attorneys appearing on behalf of various parties: Caroline Rule and Sharon McCarthy for Defendant Field, Paul Shechtman and Adam Murphy for Defendant Parse, and Bobbi C. Sternheim for Ms. Conrad. The document also notes the presence of IRS Special Agent Christine Mazzella.
DOJ-OGR-00009967.jpg
This document is a single page from an index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page provides an alphabetical list of keywords from 'informed' to 'jurors' and cites the page and line numbers where these terms appear in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009967.
DOJ-OGR-00009946.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, containing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad regarding her service in the trial of U.S. v. Daugerdas, et al. The questioning attorney probes Conrad's impartiality by referencing her past criminal record, her status as a suspended attorney, and a letter she wrote after the verdict. Conrad affirms that while she initially believed defendant David Parse was guilty, her final decision was based solely on Judge Pauley's legal instructions and was free from any bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009910.jpg
This document is an index page (page vii) from a court filing, listing various evidentiary exhibits labeled GX (Government Exhibits) and DX (Defense Exhibits). The exhibits include correspondence from 1998-2003 involving individuals such as Lisa Hurley, James Beumel, and Erwin Mayer, as well as internal communications involving Deutsche Bank and Jenkens & Gilchrist (J&G). The document also lists legal motions from 2011 regarding a new trial and evidentiary hearing concerning 'Juror No. 1'.
DOJ-OGR-00009909.jpg
This document is a table of contents or an index of exhibits from a legal case (Case 3:20-cr-00338-PA-1). It lists various documents, identified by 'GX' numbers, including emails, faxes, letters, client statements from Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, and an IRS record. The documents are dated from 1999 to 2009 and detail communications between several individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00009534.jpg
This document is a page from a 2013 legal filing (likely a sentencing memorandum) concerning the tax fraud case of United States v. Daugerdas et al. It details the conviction of David Parse for obstructing the IRS and mail fraud, noting he faces a statutory maximum of 23 years in prison. While this document is included in the unsealed bundle for the Giuffre v. Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cv-00330), the text specifically addresses the legal proceedings and sentencing guidelines of the Daugerdas tax shelter scheme, likely serving as a legal exhibit or precedent within the broader Maxwell litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009528.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 18, 2013, outlines the case against an individual named Parse, an investment representative at Deutsche Bank. It details his central role in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving fraudulent tax shelters, which resulted in over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document argues that Parse's conduct, for which he earned over $3 million in commissions, warrants a significant prison sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00009516.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, dated March 7, 2013, argues for a lower sentencing guideline for their client, Mr. Parse. The firm contends that since Mr. Parse was only convicted of three "backdating" transactions, sentencing enhancements for "sophisticated means" and "special skills" are unwarranted, as he did not design the underlying complex tax shelters. The letter provides a total loss calculation of $3,807,988 based on IRS assessments related to the transactions.
DOJ-OGR-00009500.jpg
This document is page 81 of Exhibit A-5924, filed on Feb 24, 2022, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). However, the text of the transcript appears to be from a separate legal proceeding (likely a tax fraud case involving David Parse, Jenkins & Gilchrist, and Deutsche Bank) being used as a legal precedent or argument within the Maxwell trial. Ms. Davis argues to the Court that evidence shows 'Mr. Parse' had knowing criminal involvement in obstructing the IRS, distinguishing his actions from a simple mistake.
DOJ-OGR-00009499.jpg
This document appears to be a transcript of a legal argument asserting that a jury had sufficient evidence to infer an individual's knowledge of a scheme to defraud the IRS. The argument cites testimony from multiple individuals, including Sandra Burnside and Carrie Yackee, describing an 'avalanche of work' in December to finalize tax shelter transactions, implicating Mr. Parse and Ms. Yackee at Deutsche Bank. The speaker refutes a suggestion from Mr. Shechtman's brief that Deutsche Bank's approval of the transactions meant that only a few people knew the full extent of the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00009497.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing arguments made by MS. DAVIS regarding defendant Mr. Parse. MS. DAVIS asserts overwhelming evidence of Mr. Parse's criminal involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud, specifically mentioning his role in backdated transactions and the relevance of his CPA background. The transcript also references testimony from Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein, and communications related to the case after a jury verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009474.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009344.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The testimony covers the credibility of government witnesses (lawyers who pleaded guilty to false statements to the IRS), the division of labor regarding jury selection between Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma, and a specific conversation they had at 'the plaza' regarding potential information.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-30 | Paid | IRS | Ohio Lawmakers | $60,000,000.00 | Alleged bribe to arrange a $1 billion bailout. | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
| 2016-02-01 | Paid | IRS | Laura Cohen | $500,000.00 | Revolving home-equity line of credit taken out ... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity