| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Brazil approved resolution authorizing prescription/importation of cannabis products. | Brazil | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | U.N. vote on Libyan military action | United Nations | View |
This document is a legal disclaimer and offering memorandum page outlining restrictions and rights for investors, specifically addressing residents of Canada. It details resale restrictions, enforcement of legal rights involving entities in the Cayman Islands (KUE and the General Partner), and statutory rights of action for damages or rescission in provinces like Ontario, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia.
This document is page 3 of a confidential offering memorandum or private placement memorandum (PPM) for an entity identified as 'KUE'. It contains standard legal disclaimers and 'Notice to Non-U.S. Investors,' specifically outlining regulatory compliance and restrictions for investors residing in Argentina, Australia, and Brazil. The document emphasizes that the securities ('Units') are not registered with public regulators in these jurisdictions and are intended for private transactions with sophisticated investors.
This document appears to be page 213 of a House Oversight report analyzing Edward Snowden's flight from the US. It details his decision to travel to Hong Kong rather than countries without extradition treaties (like Brazil or Iceland) specifically to utilize Chinese intelligence control as a shield against US interference. The text cites former CIA station chief Tyler Drumheller regarding the 'home court' advantage of Chinese intelligence in Hong Kong and mentions Snowden's subsequent move to Moscow. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the text exclusively concerns Edward Snowden and the NSA leaks.
This document appears to be page 212 of a House Oversight Committee report detailing the actions of Edward Snowden. It characterizes his move to contractor Booz Allen as a calculated 'expanding penetration' designed solely to steal sensitive NSA, GCHQ, and other allied intelligence files. The text discusses his awareness of the damage he caused, his communications with journalists (Risen, Lam, Poitras, Greenwald), and his strategic decision to flee to Hong Kong rather than face trial in the U.S. or flee to a non-extradition country like Brazil.
This document page, bearing a House Oversight stamp, details the legal maneuvering surrounding Edward Snowden's NSA leaks. It focuses on the involvement of ACLU lawyer Ben Wizner, who was brought in by journalists Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald to represent Snowden. The text outlines the legal challenges Wizner faced in seeking amnesty for Snowden, particularly distinguishing Snowden's actions from previous whistleblowers and managing the narrative regarding whether classified documents were taken to Russia.
This document is page 128 of a report or book (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020280) discussing the intelligence implications of Edward Snowden's actions. It analyzes theories regarding when Snowden might have come under Russian influence, arguing against early recruitment due to his risky contact with journalists Greenwald and Poitras, while supporting the 'Hong Kong Scenario' where Russian officials engaged him after his arrival there. The document mentions Putin's direct authorization of Snowden's travel to Moscow. Note: While requested as an 'Epstein-related' document, the text exclusively concerns the Snowden leaks and contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 102 of a report (likely House Oversight) detailing the immediate aftermath of Edward Snowden's NSA leaks in June 2013. It describes his logistics in Hong Kong, including moving between hotel rooms at The Mira, engaging lawyers Robert Tibbo and Jonathan Mann, and escaping to a safe house while communicating with journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. The text also notes Greenwald's subsequent departure to Brazil and the founding of The Intercept.
This document, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, details the logistical coordination behind the 2013 NSA leaks involving Edward Snowden, Laura Poitras, and Glenn Greenwald. It describes a clandestine meeting on April 19, 2013, in a New York Marriott where Poitras introduced Greenwald to communications from Snowden (alias 'Citizen 4') while employing strict operational security measures to avoid surveillance. The text also notes the alignment between Snowden's mission statement and Greenwald's public criticism of the 'Surveillance State.'
This document page, stamped with a House Oversight footer, details the formation of the Freedom of the Press Foundation in 2012 to fund WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning amidst financial blockades. It narrates the prelude to the Snowden leaks, describing Edward Snowden's admiration for journalist Glenn Greenwald's anti-surveillance writings and Snowden's initial attempts (under the alias Cincinnatus) to contact Greenwald and urge him to use email encryption. It highlights specific blog posts from November 2012 where Greenwald criticized the US surveillance state.
This document outlines the 'Fundamental Equity Opinion Key' and 'Income Ratings' used by Bank of America Merrill Lynch research, defining investment ratings such as Buy, Neutral, and Underperform alongside volatility risk indicators. It also provides extensive legal and regulatory disclosures regarding the distribution of research reports by various international affiliates in jurisdictions including the UK, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia. The page details conflicts of interest policies and specifies that prices mentioned are for informational purposes only.
This document is a boilerplate disclosure page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report titled 'Japan Macro Watch', dated November 14, 2016. It defines investment rating metrics (Buy, Neutral, Underperform), outlines analyst compensation policies, and lists various global affiliates and their regulatory bodies. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to financial records, though no specific connection to Epstein is visible in the text of this single page.
This document is a 'Disclosures' page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report titled 'Japan Economics Viewpoint,' dated November 18, 2016. It outlines legal disclaimers, conflict of interest policies, and regulatory information for various global jurisdictions where the bank operates. The document bears the House Oversight Committee stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014422', suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents, likely subpoenaed from financial institutions.
This document is a disclosure page from a BofA Merrill Lynch research report dated November 18, 2016. It details the firm's equity rating system, including investment ratings (Buy, Neutral, Underperform), volatility risks, and income ratings. The page also contains extensive legal and regulatory disclosures about the distribution of research reports by its various global affiliates.
This document is a standard financial disclosure page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report, dated November 17, 2016, associated with the '2016 Future of Financials Conference'. The page details the company's global affiliates, regulatory bodies, and general disclaimers about its research reports. Despite the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content of this specific page contains no information, names, or details related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his known activities.
This document is page 25 of what appears to be a book or article on neuroscience, detailing an experiment on decision-making and the role of the caudate nucleus. The Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030292' indicates it was part of a document production for a congressional committee. The text itself contains no information directly related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
This document is an excerpt from a news article, likely published by The New York Times, discussing the economic and logistical challenges companies face when moving their manufacturing supply chains out of China. Despite the user's prompt, the content of this specific page, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028341', is about international trade and manufacturing and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a snippet from a news article, likely from The New York Times around March 2018, discussing the trend of companies moving manufacturing from China to countries like Cambodia due to rising labor costs and trade tariffs. The text includes quotes from industry experts and details about factory operations and expansion plans. Although the prompt identifies this as an 'Epstein-related document' and it bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' evidence number, the content of the article itself is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028339, is an excerpt from a New York Times article dated July 23, 2016. The article discusses the challenges of manufacturing in Cambodia compared to China, focusing on the experiences of factory owner Elli Bobrovizki in Phnom Penh. It details logistical issues and a costly labor dispute, but contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is page 3 of a larger document, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022369'. It is a curriculum vitae or list of professional activities for an unnamed individual, detailing their speaking engagements, panel memberships, and chairmanships at various international energy, oil, and gas conferences between May 2003 and July 2010. While part of a collection of Epstein-related documents, this specific page does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates, focusing solely on the professional energy sector activities of one person.
This document is a report from the polling company YouGov detailing the results of a global poll on the world's most admired people, conducted circa late 2013/early 2014. The poll found Mr. Obama and Mr. Gates to be the top choices and provides a 'Who's Who' of other notable figures from various countries. The document itself contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its only potential connection is the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' label, suggesting it was part of a larger collection of documents submitted to a government committee.
This document is an email from Boris Nikolic to Jeffrey Epstein, dated January 13, 2014, with the subject line "mission accomplished for some." The email forwards a Times article detailing a YouGov poll that named Bill Gates the world's most admired person, highlighting his global popularity, particularly in China. The article also provides rankings for numerous other international figures in politics, business, and entertainment.
This document is an email chain from January 31, 2013, involving Jeffrey Epstein and several correspondents discussing a complex, multi-billion dollar fighter jet deal with Brazil. The conversation focuses on 'offset agreements,' which Epstein explains using a crude sexual analogy. The emails also mention lobbying for the deal by the US, France, and Sweden, and an unverified claim that a party involved works with figures like Obama and Warren Buffet.
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted on April 25, 2007, with an anonymous witness by Agent Richards and Ms. Bilafonia. The witness states that an unnamed male ('he') gave a bathing suit from Brazil to a girl who has since died. When questioned about phone numbers, the witness identifies one as her own and, when asked about a redacted person's number, she clarifies if they mean her 'baby's father,' stating she never knew his number as it was just programmed in her phone.
This document is a transcript of an interview from April 25, 2007, where an unnamed woman describes her financial interactions with an unnamed man. She recounts receiving $500 for rent, gifts for her baby shower, and a bikini from him after his trip to Brazil, while asserting that she generally never asked him for money.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity