| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
I.J. Good
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Max Newman
|
Student lecturer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
John von Neumann
|
Academic peers |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
British cryptanalysts
|
Leadership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Emil Post
|
Professional academic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Humanity
|
Philosophical predictive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
1950 paper
|
Author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
King's College
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Churchill (Winston Churchill)
|
Professional war effort |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Charles Babbage
|
Historical comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Cambridge University
|
Academic legacy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
King's College, Cambridge
|
Academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Allies
|
Allegiance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Hilbert
|
Intellectual academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
I. J. Good
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mind (Journal)
|
Author publisher |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
George Dyson
|
Author subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Winston Churchill
|
Professional historical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Church
|
Academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Academic historical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Charles Babbage
|
Intellectual predecessor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Churchill (Winston Churchill)
|
Historical connection |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Referenced in relation to Alan Turing on page 213 | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Outbreak of war made Turing's work practically important for code breaking. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Turing submitted a paper effectively inventing the modern computer. | London Mathematical Society | View |
| N/A | N/A | Turing ordered to report to Bletchley Park. | Bletchley Park, England | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Royal Pardon granted to Alan Turing | UK | View |
| 1954-01-01 | N/A | Conviction of Alan Turing | UK | View |
| 1950-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Alan Turing's paper 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence'. | N/A | View |
| 1950-01-01 | N/A | Publication of 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence' by Alan Turing. | British journal Mind | View |
| 1950-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Alan Turing's paper 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence' in the journal Mind. | United Kingdom (implied by ... | View |
| 1937-01-01 | N/A | Turing travelled to America and completed his doctoral thesis at Princeton. | Princeton, USA | View |
| 1936-01-01 | N/A | Alan Turing proved there is no general-purpose mechanical way to tell whether a program is going ... | N/A | View |
| 1936-01-01 | N/A | Alan Turing presented a paper describing the modern computer. | London Mathematical Society | View |
| 1936-01-01 | N/A | Alan Turing wrote, revised, and published 'On Computable Numbers...'. | N/A | View |
| 1936-01-01 | N/A | Publication of 'On Computable Numbers and their Application to the Entscheidungsproblem' | Cambridge | View |
| 1935-01-01 | N/A | Turing contemplating the decidability of mathematics and envisioning the Turing machine. | Cambridge/Grantchester | View |
| 1935-01-01 | N/A | Turing's discovery of a solution to the Decision Problem (Entscheidungsproblem). | Historical context | View |
| 1935-01-01 | N/A | Turing made a Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. | Cambridge | View |
A photograph showing a large black chalkboard, likely from Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion, covered in handwritten notes, diagrams, and lists. The text includes abstract concepts like 'Power', 'Deception', 'Beauty', and 'Matrix', alongside a list of prominent historical mathematicians and physicists including Leibniz, Heisenberg, Turing, and Hilbert. The board also features sketches of a bell curve and geometric grids.
This document is a page (p. 199) from a book, likely titled 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' (based on the filename ISBN), which was included in a House Oversight Committee document production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687). The text provides a historical overview of the rise of the National Security Agency (NSA), detailing its origins in WWII cryptography (breaking Enigma and Purple ciphers), its formal establishment by President Truman in 1952, and its dual mission of protecting US communications while intercepting foreign intelligence during the Cold War. The footer indicates the file was processed or printed on September 30, 2016.
This document appears to be page 126 of a larger manuscript or book included in the House Oversight Committee's investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016929). The text is academic in nature, discussing the history of cybernetics, 'Ashby's Law,' and the philosophical implications of control systems and artificial intelligence, referencing historical figures like Norbert Wiener and Alan Turing. While part of an Epstein-related document dump, this specific page contains philosophical theory rather than direct evidence of transactions or communications.
The text explores the parallels between biological evolution, specifically Hox genes, and artificial intelligence, arguing that AI currently suffers from a "mind-body problem" due to its lack of physical form. It advocates for "digital materials"—modular, programmable physical components analogous to amino acids or Lego bricks—to bridge the gap between computation and fabrication. The author references pioneers like von Neumann, Shannon, and Turing to contextualize the convergence of digital information and physical construction.
This document appears to be a page (p. 90) from a book or manuscript discussing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and philosophy of mind. The text argues against standard testing objectives for AGI, citing the paradox of testing for disobedience and referencing Alan Turing, Karl Popper, and Nick Bostrom. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of evidence collected during an investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
This document appears to be page 88 of a philosophical essay or book chapter regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The text contrasts narrow AI (specifically chess engines) with AGI, arguing that true AGI implies creativity, the ability to refuse tasks, and moral agency. The author refutes a quote by Daniel Dennett, arguing that AGI can indeed be punished or held accountable (through resource restriction) and that AGI raised in a decent society is not destined to become an enemy of civilization. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to investigations into Epstein's connections to scientists and the Edge Foundation.
This document is page 77 of a larger work, likely a book or collection of essays, bearing the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016880'. It features an essay titled 'Tech Prophecy and the Underappreciated Causal Power of Ideas' by Harvard Professor Steven Pinker. The text discusses Artificial Intelligence, the computational theory of mind, and the work of Norbert Wiener regarding cybernetics and entropy. While the text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, it is part of a House Oversight Committee production, likely related to investigations into Epstein's funding of scientific research and academia.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or essay (likely by Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn, given the Estonia and Skype references) discussing the existential risks of Artificial Intelligence. Included in House Oversight documents, the text draws parallels between political dissidence in Estonia and the 'dissident' warning of AI risk, citing figures like Eliezer Yudkowsky, Bill Joy, Alan Turing, and I.J. Good. The page focuses on the author's realization of AI dangers and their failed initial attempt to convince their Skype colleagues of the threat.
This document is a biographical profile of Jaan Tallinn, an Estonian developer and existential risk philanthropist. It details his founding of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge in 2012 and recounts a social anecdote about him breakdancing at a high-society dinner party in London. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of evidence gathered during an investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections with the scientific/intellectual community (Edge Foundation circles).
This document is page 51 of an academic or scientific essay/book discussing the history of computing and biology. It draws parallels between John von Neumann's abstract machines and DNA replication (referencing Watson and Crick), contrasts von Neumann architecture with Harvard architecture, and discusses the historical relationship between von Neumann, Alan Turing, and Norbert Wiener. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in documents produced for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's ties to the scientific community.
This document appears to be a page from an essay or book titled 'The Inhuman Mess Our Machines Have Gotten Us Into' by Rodney Brooks, an MIT computer scientist. The text discusses the history of computing and cybernetics, focusing on the contributions of Norbert Wiener, Alan Turing, and John von Neumann. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included as evidence in a Congressional investigation, likely related to the inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein's connections to MIT and the Media Lab.
This document is a page from a collection (page 42, Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016845) featuring an essay titled 'What Can We Do?' by philosopher Daniel C. Dennett. Dennett reflects on re-reading Norbert Wiener's 'The Human Use of Human Beings' and discusses the philosophical implications of Artificial Intelligence, materialism, and human dependency on technology. While Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page, the document is part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation files, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community (Edge Foundation).
This document is page 37 of a production for the House Oversight Committee (Bates 016840). It contains an essay titled 'The Third Law' by historian George Dyson. The text explores the history of computing, distinguishing between 'Old Testament' logic (Hobbes, Leibniz) and 'New Testament' machines (Turing, von Neumann), and discusses the distinctions and transitions between analog and digital computing.
This document page discusses and rebuts common arguments against the risks posed by artificial intelligence, specifically addressing the notions that AI is not imminent, that critics are Luddites, and that intelligent machines will inherently have altruistic objectives. It cites figures like Nick Bostrom, Elon Musk, and Stephen Hawking, and references the "is-ought" problem and the "naturalistic fallacy" in the context of AI ethics.
This document appears to be page 31 of a manuscript or report discussing the existential risks of Artificial Intelligence. The text argues against common dismissals of AI danger (such as the ability to 'switch it off' or that it is 'impossible'), using historical analogies involving nuclear physics (Rutherford and Szilard) and hypothetical scenarios. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of evidence collected during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's ties to the scientific community and academia.
This document appears to be page 19 of a larger text (likely a book or essay) included in a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016822). The text analyzes the legacy of mathematician Norbert Wiener, discussing both his failure to predict the hardware revolution (transistors/integrated circuits) and his successful insights into Cybernetics, feedback loops, and information theory. It details his work during WWII on anti-aircraft fire, his connection to Alan Turing's ideas, and his recruitment of Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts to MIT to work on artificial neural networks.
This page appears to be an excerpt from a book or report regarding Artificial Intelligence, specifically discussing the ELIZA program and the Turing Test. It contains a sample transcript of a user interacting with ELIZA, followed by an analysis of the program's limitations and its use in psychotherapy. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, potentially included in materials related to Jeffrey Epstein due to his known interest in science and AI, though he is not mentioned on this specific page.
This document is page 18 of a book or essay titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text, written in 2014, discusses the evolution of AI, comparing the human brain to computers, referencing Moore's Law, and predicting when artificial intelligence might match human processing power (projected here between 2053 and 2080). It mentions historical figures like Alexander Graham Bell and Alan Turing, as well as Intel founders Gordon Moore and Andy Grove.
This document appears to be a page (page 17) from a book or scientific essay discussing Alan Turing, the history of computing, and the Antikythera Mechanism. While the text itself is a historical narrative about Turing's work in 1935 and during WWII, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015707' indicates this page was included as evidence in a House Oversight investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
This document appears to be page 15 of a book or manuscript titled 'Mind over Computer,' stamped with a House Oversight footer (015705), likely part of an evidence dump related to investigations. The text discusses the history and origin of computers, highlighting Alan Turing's 1936 paper and Charles Babbage's earlier concepts, while also mentioning ancient calculating devices like the Antikythera mechanism. It includes a photograph of Babbage's Difference Engine No. 2.
This document is a page from a Table of Contents for a book or manuscript focused on advanced physics, computer science, and philosophy. It lists chapters 10 through 17 and appendices, covering topics such as Turing Machines, Hyper-Computing, Creativity, and Free Will. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015689, indicating it is part of the evidence files collected by the House Oversight Committee, likely originating from Jeffrey Epstein's collection given his known patronage of scientists in these fields.
This document is a single page (Preface, page xi) from a book, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (015685). The text is a philosophical discussion by an engineer-author regarding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and free will, referencing works by Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett. The author argues against determinism and computational theories of mind, citing Andrew Wiles' 1996 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem as evidence of non-algorithmic human creativity.
This document appears to be the back cover or an interior bio page for a book written by James Tagg regarding AI, physics, and Alan Turing. It contains a synopsis of the book's themes (Turing test, free will, quantum computing) and a biographical paragraph about Tagg, detailing his education and entrepreneurial history with Truphone. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in a production of documents to Congress, though the text itself does not explicitly mention Epstein.
This document is page 350 of a bibliography or glossary from a scientific publication concerning Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Robotics. It contains references to significant works in the field, including those by Marvin Minsky, a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, regarding cognitive diversity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, likely regarding Epstein's connections to the scientific community and his funding of AI research.
This document appears to be page 276 of a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It discusses theoretical computer science concepts, specifically Turing machines, non-deterministic machines, hyper-computers, and the role of randomness (Lavarand) in computation. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015966' stamp, indicating it was included as an exhibit in a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to inquiries into scientific funding or intellectual interests associated with the investigation's subject.
Described the theoretical basis of computing and the design of a general-purpose computing machine.
Lecture warning that machines might eventually take control.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity