SAAR Network
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
IIIT
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Suleiman Abdul Aziz al Rajhi
|
Funder affiliate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-10-14 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding failure to state a claim. | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2002-03-01 | N/A | Raids on SAAR Network organizations' offices in Herndon as part of Operation Greenquest. | Herndon | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Reference date for the existence of over one hundred entities in the SAAR network. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017930.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of civil RICO and ATA complaints against several SAAR Network executives (Al-Awani, Ashrafs, Mirza, Unus) due to lack of specific allegations connecting them to al Qaeda support. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss for Jamal Barzinji regarding material support claims, citing his control over bank accounts and alleged financial transfers to al Qaeda, while dismissing the RICO claim against him. It also briefly mentions a motion for reconsideration by NCB (National Commercial Bank).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929.jpg
A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017928.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details rulings on motions to dismiss for various defendants including the Success Foundation (dismissed), Wa'el Jalaidan (denied), IIRO (denied), Rabita Trust (denied), and the SAAR Network. It discusses allegations of financial support for al Qaeda and corporate structures involving entities in Herndon, Virginia. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, potentially related to financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly mentioned on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017926.jpg
This document is page 23 of a legal opinion from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), printed from Westlaw with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the dismissal of certain claims (TVPA, negligence) against defendants including the IIRO, SAAR Network, and Tarik Hamdi, while analyzing RICO liability standards. A specific section details allegations against Tarik Hamdi, accusing him of supplying a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden in 1996, which was subsequently used to coordinate the African embassy bombings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017903.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Supplement (Vol. 349, 2d Series) containing the header of a decision in the case *Lawrence Agee v. Richard Grunert, et al.* (D. Vermont, 2004). The case involves a physician suing his former partners for defamation and other torts after they reported his mental unfitness to practice; the court largely ruled in favor of the defendants, finding their statements privileged and required by ethics codes. The top of the page also contains the conclusion of a separate, unrelated case involving the 'SAAR Network' and 'Adel Batterjee' (likely the *Burnett* 9/11 litigation), and the footer indicates the document is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017902.jpg
This document is page 837 of a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The page details the court's rulings on motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi defendants, including the SAAR Network, Adel A.J. Batterjee, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Sultan, Prince Turki). While some motions were granted for lack of jurisdiction, others (such as those for SAAR Network and Batterjee) were denied, allowing claims to proceed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017897.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) regarding the 'Burnett Plaintiffs' lawsuit against Al Rajhi Bank concerning liability for the September 11 attacks and terror financing. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank and its owners funded fronts for Hamas (Tulkarm Charity Committee) and al Qaeda, and discusses the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp but does not mention Jeffrey Epstein; it focuses entirely on banking compliance and terrorism financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017893.jpg
This document is page 828 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely 'In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001') bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of RICO and Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) claims against various Saudi banks and individuals (including the Saudi Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) because the TVPA only applies to individuals acting under color of law, and the RICO claims failed to prove the defendants directed the enterprise. The text also introduces the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and references the September 11 attacks in a footnote. While labeled as 'Epstein-related' by the user (likely due to its inclusion in a House Oversight production regarding banking irregularities or Deutsche Bank), the text specifically concerns 9/11 litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017892.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion concerning the "In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001" litigation, specifically addressing RICO claims against Arab Bank and the SAAR Network. The court dismisses the plaintiffs' claims under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a) for failure to allege injury from investment of racketeering income and discusses the requirements for liability under § 1962(c) and (d), noting that defendants must have some part in directing the enterprise's operation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017887.jpg
This document is page 822 from a Federal Supplement court opinion (House Oversight record) regarding 9/11-related lawsuits (Ashton and Burnett complaints). The court dismissed complaints against individuals Tariq, Omar, and Bakr Binladin for lack of jurisdiction but denied the motion to dismiss for the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), citing the need for discovery regarding SBG's potential ties to al-Qaeda and operations in Maryland. The document also outlines allegations against the 'SAAR Network,' described as a web of charities allegedly established to fund terrorist organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023395.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details allegations against Saudi financial institutions, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and DMI Trust, regarding their financing of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorist groups through complex networks of charities and investments. The text specifically highlights a $50 million capital injection by Osama bin Laden into Al Shamal Bank and names various Saudi royals and businessmen as knowingly supporting terrorism. While labeled as Epstein-related in the prompt, the text itself focuses exclusively on 9/11 litigation and terror financing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity