SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017365.jpg
This document is page 122 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a brief exchange where Ms. Sternheim requests a sidebar with the Judge to discuss an issue, which the Court grants. The document notes that the subsequent pages containing the sidebar discussion (pages 123-125) are sealed.
DOJ-OGR-00017362.jpg
This document is the final page of a court transcript from a proceeding on August 10, 2022, filed as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge discusses rising COVID incidents at a facility and states they will look into availability of something at a location called MDC. After confirming neither the government (Ms. Moe) nor the defense (Ms. Sternheim) have anything further, the court is adjourned.
DOJ-OGR-00017360.jpg
This document is a court transcript page dated August 10, 2022, detailing the conclusion of a trial. The judge confirms a unanimous verdict with two individual jurors, then addresses the counsel before formally dismissing the entire jury. The judge provides the jury with specific instructions regarding their freedom to discuss the case while also mandating confidentiality about the deliberation process, the identities of other jurors, and any information under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00017359.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, declaring 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three, Four, Five, and Six. The remainder of the page documents the Court polling individual jurors (Nos. 26, 48, 49, 37, 50, 70, 124, 29, 89, and 2) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00017358.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the moment a verdict is about to be read. The judge calls the court to order, brings in the jury, and confirms with the foreperson that a verdict has been reached. The judge then begins to read the verdict, starting with 'Count One: Guilty.'
DOJ-OGR-00017357.jpg
A court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated August 10, 2022. The Judge discusses sustaining objections and finalizing redactions for a document. Later, following a recess, the Court reconvenes to address a note (likely from the jury) requesting the transcript of Larry Visoski (Epstein's long-time pilot), which is identified as Court Exhibit 20.
DOJ-OGR-00017353.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and the Court regarding the trial schedule, particularly concerning holiday plans and the jury's commitment through January 15th. The Judge decides to proceed with the trial every day, overriding preferences for a break, due to the significant concern that a participant testing positive for COVID-19 would cause a substantial quarantine delay, which is deemed a greater risk to the trial's progress.
DOJ-OGR-00017352.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge discusses a note from the jury (Court Exhibit 18) which asks for clarification on their deliberation schedule, specifically if they must continue every day, including 12/31 and 1/1/2022. The judge reads the jury's question to counsel and begins to formulate a response confirming they must continue deliberations as needed.
DOJ-OGR-00017350.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, as well as the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00017349.jpg
This document is the final page of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a brief exchange between the Judge ('The Court'), Ms. Moe (Prosecution), and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) confirming there are no further matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The proceedings are adjourned until December 29, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.
DOJ-OGR-00017348.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the Judge addressing the jury regarding the schedule for deliberations, stating they will proceed every day until a verdict is reached. The Judge instructs jurors to contact Ms. Williams regarding any substantial hardships due to the schedule.
DOJ-OGR-00017347.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details instructions from THE COURT to the jury regarding their deliberation schedule and adherence to COVID-19 protocols. The court grants the jury's request to end deliberations at 5:00 p.m. today and resume at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow, maintaining a general schedule of 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m. It emphasizes strict mask-wearing (KN95/N95), social distancing, and offers transportation assistance via Ms. Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00017344.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, discussing the scheduling of a trial's jury deliberation. An unnamed speaker (likely the judge) explains the necessity of the current schedule, citing a significant increase in COVID-19 omicron variant cases in New York City, which poses a risk to trial completion and could lead to a mistrial. Mr. Pagliuca, addressing 'Your Honor,' expresses concern about jurors deliberating through the weekend and New Year's, arguing against retracting a prior commitment from the Court to give them those days off, suggesting deliberation only during the workweek.
DOJ-OGR-00017343.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed in August 2022 but recording events during the trial's jury deliberations (likely December 2021). The Judge discusses a note received from the jury requesting to end the day at 5:00 p.m. and resume the next morning. Citing the risk of the 'omicron variant,' the Judge rules that deliberations must continue every day, including weekends if necessary, until a verdict is reached.
DOJ-OGR-00017342.jpg
This document is page 9 of 16 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures the very end of a proceeding session where a speaker dismisses someone or calls for a break, followed immediately by a formal recess notation. The majority of the page is blank, marked 'Continued on next page'.
DOJ-OGR-00017341.jpg
This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The attorney argues for a supplemental jury instruction concerning the territorial limits of New York law, which the judge rejects. The judge then raises concerns about potential trial interruptions from a health 'variant' and the need for jurors to plan for extended deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00017340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between defense counsel Mr. Everdell and the presiding judge. Mr. Everdell is concerned the jury might convict his client, Ms. Maxwell, based on conduct that occurred solely in New Mexico for a charge under New York law and requests a supplemental instruction. The judge denies the request, stating the proposed instruction is incorrect and that the defense missed an earlier opportunity to limit the related testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00017338.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The presiding judge explains the decision to extend jury deliberations by one hour each day due to a significant spike in COVID-19 cases (omicron variant) in New York City, which poses a risk of disrupting the trial. A participant, Mr. Everdell, briefly acknowledges the judge's statement.
DOJ-OGR-00017337.jpg
This legal document is a court transcript page where a judge explains their reasoning for rejecting a defense proposal regarding how to answer a jury's question about 'Count Four'. The judge found the proposal unhelpful and reiterated the need for the jury to consider the full legal instruction. The judge also formally places on the record their decision from the previous day to extend the jury's deliberation schedule by one hour.
DOJ-OGR-00017335.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Moe addresses the Court in the absence of the jury, first noting a safety caution regarding an open door to the jury room. She then argues against a defense letter filed earlier that morning, stating it repeats arguments regarding jury instructions that the Court had already rejected the previous day.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017333.jpg
This document is the final page (29 of 29) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the end of the court session where the jury is dismissed, and attorneys Ms. Moe (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) confirm they have no further matters. The court adjourns until December 28, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.
DOJ-OGR-00017330.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about the jury deliberation schedule. The judge sets a default end time of 6 p.m., while allowing for hardship exceptions, and overrules an objection from an attorney, Ms. Menninger, who was concerned that certain language might pressure the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00017329.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court case where Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe discuss the jury's deliberation schedule with the court. The court suggests that if deliberations are not complete by tomorrow, the jurors should be available until at least 6 p.m.
DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys (MS. MOE and MR. EVERDELL) regarding a note received from the jury. The judge directs the attorneys to review jury instruction number 21. Ms. Moe, representing the government, states that it is within the court's discretion to set the deliberation schedule and agrees that the jury should be advised to expect an extended session the next day.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity