SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013117.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies about being contacted to schedule appointments, often by individuals named Sarah or Maxwell, or through intermediaries like her mother or a person named Shawn. The calls sometimes mentioned that people would be flying in from New York for these appointments.
DOJ-OGR-00013116.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that a person named Maxwell would call her to schedule appointments, often stating that "they," referring to Maxwell and Mr. Epstein, were flying in from out of town. The transcript also notes the admission of an exhibit (GX-608), Carolyn's mother's phone number, into evidence under seal to protect the witness's anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013115.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she provided her cell phone, her mother's cell phone, and Shawn's home phone number to Maxwell and Sarah for the purpose of scheduling 'massage appointments'. She states she cannot recall her own old number but remembers her mother's, which she has written down for the court as part of Government Exhibit 608.
DOJ-OGR-00013114.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. Carolyn testifies regarding the scheduling logistics for massages at Jeffrey Epstein's house, stating that initially Ghislaine Maxwell would call to set up times, but later Sarah Kellen or Carolyn herself would make the calls. The witness also confirms seeing Maxwell in an office area off the kitchen at Epstein's house even after Sarah Kellen began handling the scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00013113.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness identifies Government Exhibit 104 as a photograph of herself at age 14, taken when she visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The exhibit is admitted under seal to protect her anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013110.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Carolyn. She describes an incident where she and another woman, Virginia, gave a massage to Mr. Epstein, which was followed by Virginia having sex with Mr. Epstein while Carolyn watched. Carolyn confirms that she and Virginia were paid $300 for their services afterwards.
DOJ-OGR-00013109.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct testimony of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn recounts being in a room with a woman named Virginia, where they set up a massage table. She states that Virginia undressed and asked her to do the same, and shortly after, Mr. Epstein entered the room and laid on the massage table.
DOJ-OGR-00013108.jpg
This document is page 95 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies about being introduced to Ghislaine Maxwell by Virginia (Giuffre) in a kitchen. Maxwell instructed Virginia to take Carolyn upstairs to 'show her what to do,' after which Carolyn describes entering Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom and bathroom, providing specific details about the layout and furniture, including an 'ugly polka-dotted couch.'
DOJ-OGR-00013107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies about her first visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house, stating she went inside with a person named Virginia. Upon entering the kitchen, they were greeted by Ms. Maxwell, whom Carolyn describes as an older lady with an accent and shoulder-length black hair.
DOJ-OGR-00013105.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn recounts meeting a woman named Virginia at age 14, socializing in a group that included Shawn and Virginia's boyfriend Tony, and being asked by Virginia if she wanted to 'go make money.' This offer is presented as Carolyn's first recollection of Jeffrey Epstein's name being mentioned in connection with her group.
DOJ-OGR-00013102.jpg
Court transcript of direct examination testimony from a witness named Carolyn. She testifies about her life at age 14 living in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, describing a difficult home life with an addicted mother. She states that between ages 14 and 16, she made money by going to Jeffrey Epstein's house, having been introduced to him by a boyfriend she had at age 14.
DOJ-OGR-00013101.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn, who testifies about moving from New York to Florida in 1999, dropping out of school in the seventh grade, and her history of addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
DOJ-OGR-00013100.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. During this segment, the witness identifies Government Exhibit 11 (GX-11) as her birth certificate and confirms her full name and date of birth listed on the document without stating them aloud. The defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, offers no objection to the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00013099.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms she requested to testify using only her first name for privacy and identifies 'Government Exhibit 11' as her birth certificate.
DOJ-OGR-00013096.jpg
This document is page 83 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley, who is subsequently excused by the judge while the jury is not present. The court then communicates with Ms. Pomerantz (representing the government) before declaring a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013095.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding technical details of how email clients populate messages when connected to the internet. Following the questioning, the Court excuses Mr. Flatley and dismisses the jury for a 15-minute break.
DOJ-OGR-00013094.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect and recross examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. Attorney Pomerantz questions him about emails he reviewed in Government Exhibit 54, specifically concerning the email address gmax1@mindspring.com. Attorney Menninger then conducts a recross examination, focusing on Mr. Flatley's technical understanding of email clients like Outlook and Mail.
DOJ-OGR-00013093.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony centers on a computer which had only one non-default user account belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that other people could have accessed the computer, but the witness repeatedly states they do not know who had access or where the computer was located.
DOJ-OGR-00013092.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on the creation of a document, with the attorney trying to establish that the witness does not know who created it, where the computer was, or if a person named 'gmax' was present. The witness confirms their lack of knowledge on these points, while an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00013090.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on computer forensics, establishing that file metadata like 'created date' is automatically generated by the computer's system clock, not by a user. Flatley explains that their team accessed data from a password-protected computer not by logging in, but by creating a cloned image of the hard drive and analyzing it with forensic software, thereby bypassing the operating system's security.
DOJ-OGR-00013089.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony clarifies that the 'author' metadata in a Microsoft Word document is derived from the user profile that set up the software, not necessarily the individual creating a specific file. An example is cited where the computer account name was 'Ghislaine' and the corresponding author name in Word was 'gmax'.
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00013087.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley, who testifies about creating a bit-for-bit digital 'image' of a 'clone'. Flatley confirms the image is identical to the clone it was made from but admits to not knowing the origin of the clone or if it was an identical copy of another source.
DOJ-OGR-00013086.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on a hard drive Flatley examined, establishing that it originated from a desktop computer and was a clone of another hard drive. The questioning culminates in the attorney asking if the witness, therefore, created a "clone of a clone".
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony concerns the chain of custody for a specific hard drive seized in July 2007. Flatley admits that when he received the evidence box containing three copies of the drive, the evidence tape was already broken and the box featured a xerox of a different hard drive on the front.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity