SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017912.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio explains the first two stages of grooming to a jury, stating that offenders first target vulnerable children and then place themselves in positions of unquestioned authority and access (like a coach or teacher) to isolate their chosen victim.
DOJ-OGR-00017911.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, an expert witness, who defines the concept of 'grooming' and outlines its five distinct stages, including victim selection, isolation, building trust through deception, desensitization, and maintaining control for coercion.
DOJ-OGR-00017910.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, filed on August 10, 2022, as part of a legal case. Dr. Rocchio, an expert, testifies that childhood sexual abuse is typically committed through grooming and coercion by individuals known to the child, rather than physical force by strangers. The testimony defines 'grooming' as deceptive tactics used by perpetrators to engage a child in sexual abuse and discusses its recognition within the psychological community.
DOJ-OGR-00017909.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination in a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has no personal knowledge of the case facts, has not interviewed any witnesses, and that his testimony will not be based on specifics from this case. Dr. Rocchio also states he is being paid an hourly rate for his time preparing and testifying.
DOJ-OGR-00017907.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a psychologist, who is establishing his credentials by detailing his leadership roles within the American Psychological Association (specifically the division of trauma psychology and ethics committee) and his state psychological association.
DOJ-OGR-00017905.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on August 10, 2022. Rocchio testifies about their professional background, stating they are a Clinical Assistant Professor in the department of psychiatry at Brown University School of Medicine since June 2020. Their responsibilities include supervising psychiatric fellows and conducting seminars on trauma.
DOJ-OGR-00017904.jpg
This document is page 31 of 228 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It features the direct examination of a clinical psychologist named Rocchio. The witness testifies to having 30 years of experience specializing in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, specifically treating 'hundreds upon hundreds' of victims of childhood sexual abuse, including teenagers and adolescents aged 12 and up.
DOJ-OGR-00017903.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic psychologist, who testifies about their professional background, explaining that they provide independent evaluations for both prosecution/plaintiff and defense sides. Dr. Rocchio confirms holding psychology licenses in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00017902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz questions a witness, Dr. Rocchio, about the nature of his forensic practice. Dr. Rocchio explains that he is hired by attorneys to conduct psychological evaluations to assess mental health issues related to alleged abuse or to determine the role of mental health in criminal cases for sentencing purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00017899.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on August 10, 2022. Rocchio details their professional background, including a predoctoral fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine and work at Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale Psychiatric Institute. They also describe their postdoctoral fellowship, which focused on treating chronically suicidal and self-injurious women.
DOJ-OGR-00017898.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio provides definitions for 'childhood sexual abuse' and clarifies that 'child' refers to someone under 18. The witness also testifies to having completed approximately 4,000 hours of supervised clinical work with hundreds of patients during their graduate studies.
DOJ-OGR-00017897.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination from a legal case, filed on August 10, 2022. In the testimony, Dr. Rocchio describes his doctoral training in clinical psychology, which followed a 'scientist practitioner model'. He states his areas of focus included traumatic stress, forensic psychology, and interpersonal violence, and he provides definitions for these terms as requested by the questioner.
DOJ-OGR-00017896.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the beginning of the direct examination of Dr. Lisa Rocchio. Called as a witness by the Government, Dr. Rocchio, a clinical and forensic psychologist, is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about her professional expertise and educational qualifications, including her degrees from Emory University and the University of Rhode Island.
DOJ-OGR-00017893.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kane by Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a document describing a student as a 'self-employed interior decorator' who is represented by an agent. Defense attorney Mr. Rohrbach objects to the agent's name being read aloud, arguing lack of relevance, and the Court sustains the objection, instructing the jury to look at the document themselves instead.
DOJ-OGR-00017891.jpg
A court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Rohrbach examines witness Mr. Kane regarding Government Exhibit 761, a student application for 12th grade. The testimony reveals the student's present school is the Alexander W. Dreyfoos School of the Arts, while the exhibit itself is sealed to protect the student/witness's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00017890.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a document. An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against an objection from defense counsel, stating that the document qualifies as an 'adoptive business record' of a school because it was integrated into their files and relied upon, despite a witness's testimony questioning its reliability. The judge ultimately overrules the objection, allowing the document into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017889.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting a sidebar objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues against the admissibility of a school record, comparing it to a police report with third-party hearsay, specifically regarding a form that lists Jeffrey Epstein as 'financially responsible' for a student referred to as 'Jane'. The defense argues it is unclear who wrote Epstein's name on the form (Jane or her mother) and challenges the reliability of that specific information.
DOJ-OGR-00017888.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It captures a brief exchange during the direct examination of a witness named Kane, where attorney Ms. Menninger raises an objection citing Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) (Business Records Exception). The Judge acknowledges the objection and allows counsel to approach the sidebar to make a record of the argument.
DOJ-OGR-00017887.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Kane by Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on establishing the business records foundation for documents from the 'Professional Children's School,' specifically detailing how applications are reviewed, how families are contacted, and confirming that records are retained in the ordinary course of business. Following this testimony, the government moves to offer an exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017886.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kane. The questioning establishes that the school associated with the witness does not have knowledge of or a way to verify the accuracy of information on a specific form, including details about student referrals, financial responsibility, and who paid for the student's attendance. The witness repeatedly confirms their lack of knowledge and the school's lack of relevant records.
DOJ-OGR-00017885.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a voir dire examination dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions a witness, Mr. Kane, about a form from the Professional Children's School. The questioning focuses on whether the school verifies handwritten information added to the form, with Mr. Kane stating that the school's admissions director would contact the family to confirm the details.
DOJ-OGR-00017884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records the direct examination of a witness, Kane, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, regarding the authentication of an enrollment application for the Professional Children's School, marked as Government Exhibit 761. An opposing attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on the grounds of hearsay, but the court overrules the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00017883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Kane. Kane describes a school's student record retention policy, stating that transcripts and recommendation letters are kept permanently, while other documents are typically shredded after six to seven years. Kane also admits that this purging process was not always consistently applied to older files.
DOJ-OGR-00017882.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kane. Kane describes the record-keeping practices of the Professional Children's School, explaining how student permanent files are created and what they contain. The witness states that records are now maintained electronically but were kept as hard copy files in the 1990s and up until about ten years ago.
DOJ-OGR-00017881.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Paul Kane by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. Mr. Kane identifies himself as the director of finance for the Professional Children's School in New York City and provides a brief description of the school's history and purpose.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity