SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00011616.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a sentencing hearing on July 22, 2022, where a judge sentences Ms. Maxwell. The judge imposes five years of supervised release, a $750,000 fine, and a mandatory special assessment, justifying the fine by noting Ms. Maxwell's ability to pay due to a $10 million bequest she received from Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00011615.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, detailing the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The judge, noting her lack of remorse, imposes a sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment and five years of supervised release. The sentence is broken down by count, with all terms to run concurrently.
DOJ-OGR-00011614.jpg
This document is page 95 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 22, 2022. The judge rejects Maxwell's claims regarding poor treatment at the MDC and lack of preparation time, noting a pattern of dishonesty and 'deflection of blame' consistent with her perjury in a civil deposition. While acknowledging that Maxwell and her attorney Ms. Sternheim expressed sympathy for the victims' suffering, the judge emphasizes that Maxwell failed to express acceptance of responsibility.
DOJ-OGR-00011613.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, in which a judge discusses sentencing factors for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge acknowledges that conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) have been extremely difficult for all inmates due to the pandemic, and that Ms. Maxwell faced additional surveillance as a high-profile defendant. However, the judge explicitly rejects the defense's argument that Ms. Maxwell was singled out for uniquely harsh and punishing treatment.
DOJ-OGR-00011612.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a sentencing hearing for Ms. Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. The judge discusses the factors influencing the sentence, acknowledging mitigating aspects such as Ms. Maxwell's age (over 60), lack of prior convictions, charitable work, and positive letters from family and a fellow inmate. However, the judge states that her 'decade-long pattern of predatory activity' justifies a substantial sentence, even if she is not considered a continuing danger to the public.
DOJ-OGR-00011611.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge outlines the rationale for a substantial sentence, citing the gravity of the offense, the harm to victims, and the need for general deterrence against sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. The judge emphasizes that Maxwell's wealth and status do not place her above the law.
DOJ-OGR-00011610.jpg
This page from a court transcript details the abuse inflicted upon a victim named Carolyn by the defendant, specifically noting that the defendant exploited Carolyn's past trauma. It further describes a broader pattern of criminal conduct by Ms. Maxwell and Epstein involving the victimization of multiple underage girls and acknowledges the bravery of the victims who testified at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011609.jpg
This document is page 90 of a sentencing transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details the judge or prosecutor's argument regarding the severity of Maxwell's punishment, citing her 'heinous and predatory' conduct described by the Probation Department. Specific details are provided regarding the abuse of a victim named 'Jane' (age 14), including grooming tactics, instruction on how to sexually please Epstein, and direct sexual abuse by both Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011608.jpg
This document is page 89 of a sentencing transcript filed on July 22, 2022, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The presiding judge explains that Maxwell is being sentenced specifically for her own role in enticing, transporting, and trafficking underage girls (some as young as 14) for sexual abuse by and with Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing that she is not being punished merely as a proxy for Epstein but for her own direct participation in the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the legal considerations for an upcoming sentencing. The judge states the guideline range is 188 to 235 months but clarifies that, due to the Supreme Court's 'Booker' decision, this is only one of many factors to be considered under federal statute 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). The judge outlines these factors, including the nature of the offense, deterrence, and public safety, before concluding that the sentence must be sufficient but not greater than necessary.
DOJ-OGR-00011605.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, containing a statement from an individual being sentenced in a case related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker, who claims to have never met Epstein but was associated with someone who did, apologizes to the victims for their pain and hopes their conviction brings closure. They express that Epstein is the one who should have faced prosecution years ago and lament the personal relationships they have lost due to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00011602.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely from a sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. The speaker, presumably her attorney, argues for a lenient sentence by highlighting her age (over 60), lack of prior criminal history, and positive contributions while incarcerated, such as tutoring fellow inmates in the MDC. The attorney contrasts her good character with the 'terrible conduct' for which she is being sentenced.
DOJ-OGR-00011601.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding, specifically a sentencing hearing for Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 22, 2022. The speaker, presumably her defense attorney, is arguing for a more lenient sentence by presenting mitigating factors from her life. These factors include a traumatic family tragedy involving her eldest brother's death, a difficult upbringing with a 'narcissistic, brutish, and punitive father,' and the long-term 'controlling, demanding, manipulative' influence of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00011597.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a victim impact statement, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The anonymous 48-year-old speaker describes traveling from Philadelphia to attend the trial in Manhattan and reflects on how their life was jeopardized for decades. The speaker states that the key difference in their life was meeting Ghislaine Maxwell, who they accuse of having "fed me to Jeffrey Epstein."
DOJ-OGR-00011596.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim detailing over a decade of severe emotional and physical suffering, including a diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), following abuse. The speaker explains that the arrests of Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020 were pivotal, providing the validation needed to finally disclose the abuse to others and begin a path toward closure.
DOJ-OGR-00011595.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing the profound and lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker describes being terrified and threatened with death, and how her attempts to escape by moving were futile as they always found her. This involvement led to a decade of severe mental and physical health issues, including over two dozen hospitalizations, and left her unable to hold a job or care for herself.
DOJ-OGR-00011594.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript where an unnamed victim details her abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. After attempting to cut ties, Maxwell located her at her new job in the fall of 1995, manipulated her back into their circle, and orchestrated a trip to Florida that resulted in her being fired. This vulnerability was exploited by Maxwell and Epstein, who then began trafficking, assaulting, and raping her.
DOJ-OGR-00011593.jpg
This legal document is a first-person account from a former salesperson at Henri Bendel and student at FIT. The narrator describes their first encounter with Ghislaine Maxwell, which began as a seemingly positive customer interaction but was used to lure the narrator to a hotel to meet Jeffrey Epstein. That night, the narrator was sexually assaulted by both Maxwell and Epstein, an event described as the first of many such assaults that caused the narrator's life and studies to 'crack'.
DOJ-OGR-00011592.jpg
This document is page 73 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. It features the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Ransome, who condemns Maxwell's lack of remorse and asserts her own survival. Following this, the Court introduces Ms. Stein, who begins her statement by recounting her move to New York in 1991 to attend FIT and her subsequent employment at Henri Bendel, where she encountered Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011590.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, featuring a victim impact statement. The victim details how Epstein and Maxwell used the promise of admission to FIT (Fashion Institute of Technology) to manipulate them, while simultaneously subjecting them to body shaming (calling them a 'piglet'), forced diets (Atkins), and conflicting medical treatments. The victim describes escaping to the U.K. in 2007 and suffering from severe PTSD, anxiety, and depression as a result of the trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00011589.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing horrific sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell over seven to eight months. The victim describes being manipulated and abused daily at Epstein's New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, culminating in an escape attempt. The testimony highlights the methods of control and psychological torment used by Epstein and Maxwell to ensnare their victims.
DOJ-OGR-00011588.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. It captures a portion of a victim impact statement hearing, where the court acknowledges written submissions from Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria Farmer, and Ms. Helm before hearing live testimony from Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome begins her testimony by describing the lasting trauma from a "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators" and recounts how she was approached by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya after moving to New York at age 22.
DOJ-OGR-00011587.jpg
This document is a transcript of a victim impact statement from a legal proceeding, filed on July 22, 2022. An unnamed victim directly addresses 'Ghislaine,' recounting the severe and lasting trauma caused by molestation and manipulation she orchestrated. The victim expresses a desire for Ghislaine to be imprisoned for life but also asserts her own resilience and survival.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity