SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014517.jpg
This document is page 117 of a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Menninger) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney argues against the credibility of a witness named Annie, highlighting inconsistencies between her testimony and statements made to the government in 2006 and 2020 regarding a trip to New Mexico and the nature of massages. The defense asserts that Epstein, not Maxwell, communicated with Annie's mother and that Maxwell was unaware of Epstein's hidden agenda.
DOJ-OGR-00014516.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely an attorney. Menninger argues that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, had no involvement in a trip to New York taken by a person named Annie, stating the trip's purpose was for Annie to see her sister. To support this, Menninger asserts that Maxwell is never mentioned in Annie's diaries from that time and suggests that Annie's memories of events are unreliable and colored by hindsight.
DOJ-OGR-00014515.jpg
This document is a legal summation describing the testimony of Ms. Menninger regarding two encounters with Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting with her sister in his office to discuss college applications, and the second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported to the Victims Compensation Fund as sexual abuse. The testimony also asserts that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present or involved in these events.
DOJ-OGR-00014514.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. The speaker attempts to discredit two individuals: an unnamed woman by questioning her claims of secret flights and a $5 million payment from the government, and Annie Farmer by highlighting a court instruction that her alleged encounter with Epstein and Maxwell was not illegal as charged, and by noting that she was introduced to Epstein by her sister, Maria, who worked for him.
DOJ-OGR-00014513.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness (likely 'Jane' or Carolyn) by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the FBI regarding her housing (Bear Lake Estates), her age when moving to Interlochen, and the timeline of meeting Donald Trump in a green car owned by Epstein. The defense argues the witness fabricated Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement at the suggestion of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00014512.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and 'contaminated' memory. The speaker presents evidence, including testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log, to contradict Jane's account of events involving Epstein's Santa Fe property. The summation alleges that Jane deliberately altered her timeline to make herself seem younger and that her memory was influenced by news reports and conversations with family.
DOJ-OGR-00014511.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in a trial related to Epstein. The speaker challenges a witness's testimony about Epstein's New York house by pointing out she failed to recall a major 1994 renovation mentioned by Larry Visoski. The speaker also argues that no government staff corroborated the witness's story or confirmed anything unusual, and introduces testimony from Cim Espinosa, who worked for Epstein and booked guests like "Jane" and her mother into his apartments.
DOJ-OGR-00014510.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the closing summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She attacks the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting discrepancies between Jane's testimony about the Palm Beach house layout (specifically the location of the massage room and master bathroom) and the actual floor plans/photos. Menninger argues that Jane's description of a 'light beachy feel' and a separate massage room off the master bath is factually incorrect, asserting the attached room is merely a closet.
DOJ-OGR-00014509.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues against the government's claim that a woman named Michelle is a random person, citing testimony from witnesses Jane and Michelle herself to establish that she is a specific individual who was friends with another person named Emmy. The summation aims to prove that Jane is not fabricating connections but identifying real people she encountered in 'Epstein's world'.
DOJ-OGR-00014508.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is analyzing the testimony of a witness named Jane. Menninger questions Jane's credibility regarding allegations of 'sexual massages' with women named Sophie and Eva, suggesting Jane may have invented the names. However, Menninger then introduces a flight log from November 1996 showing Jane, Sophie, and Eva (identified as Dr. Eva Dubin) on a flight together, using this evidence to re-contextualize their relationship and challenge Jane's narrative.
DOJ-OGR-00014506.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, is delivering a summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger systematically attacks the credibility of a key witness by highlighting numerous instances where the witness claims she cannot remember crucial details of her alleged encounters with Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the witness's lack of memory regarding being touched, kissed, or seeing Maxwell present during sexual acts contradicts the government's case and makes her testimony unreliable.
DOJ-OGR-00014505.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the witness 'Jane' originally had no memory of abuse in New Mexico in 2019 but fabricated or recovered a memory after being pressured by the government four times, characterizing this as 'suggestion.' The defense also highlights that Jane testified she does not recall ever being alone in a room with both Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein during the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014504.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that a witness's testimony is unreliable due to significant memory lapses and inconsistencies, specifically highlighting contradictory accounts given to the FBI versus in court regarding the location and circumstances of the first instance of sexual abuse involving Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014502.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness referred to as 'Jane' by highlighting discrepancies in her testimony regarding her age during Mike Wallace's birthday and presenting a photo inscription where Jane thanks Epstein for 'rocking my world.' The text also notes that Jane continued to fly on Epstein's planes (paid for by Shoppers Travel) into her early 20s, including flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014501.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger filed 08/10/22) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting inconsistencies in her testimony regarding dates, her age during specific trips (New York, New Mexico, Europe), and her communications with her mother regarding abuse versus other lawsuits. The text specifically mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and cites a 1997 flight log entry.
DOJ-OGR-00014497.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is challenging the credibility of a witness named 'Jane'. Menninger points out that Jane failed to identify Ghislaine and other women in a sworn pleading, despite allegedly being with them. She also contrasts Jane's claims of extreme poverty and homelessness with evidence that she and her two brothers applied for an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year for three years.
DOJ-OGR-00014493.jpg
This document is a page from a defense attorney's (Ms. Menninger) summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues that the government failed to prove its case, specifically challenging the narrative that Maxwell targeted and recruited young women. The defense points to testimony indicating that other individuals, such as Virginia Roberts and Maria Farmer, were responsible for introducing victims like Carolyn and Annie Farmer to Jeffrey Epstein, not Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014486.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, questions the credibility of witnesses who added Maxwell to their stories only after hiring personal injury lawyers, and points out discrepancies between testimony and flight logs regarding travel.
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
A transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Judge that they should be allowed to suggest witnesses were manipulated by civil attorneys, citing a witness named 'Carolyn' whose detailed 2008 legal filings and depositions did not mention Ms. Maxwell, implying her involvement was fabricated later. The Court overrules the objection to this line of argumentation at the opening stage but asks for evidence that attorneys explicitly told witnesses what to say.
DOJ-OGR-00011720.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where attorney Mr. Pagliuca discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding communications between witnesses' lawyers and the government. Specifically, Pagliuca mentions an email from attorney Mr. Scarola to the government suggesting ten topics for an interview with a woman named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications (proffers and emails) are privileged and how they will be introduced without calling the lawyers as witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00011719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Ms. Sternheim and the Judge. Ms. Sternheim argues that lawyers who attended proffer sessions with the government can be considered witnesses, but the Judge denies this, stating that such an action would have required a specific briefing that was never submitted. The core issue is the admissibility of testimony from these lawyers during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011718.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conference during a trial. The defense counsel, Ms. Sternheim, claims in her opening statement that witnesses' memories were manipulated by their civil lawyers, prompting an objection from the prosecution, Ms. Comey and Ms. Moe. Ms. Moe argues to the judge that introducing evidence about lawyer-client conversations is inappropriate and that the issue of subpoenaing these lawyers had already been raised.
DOJ-OGR-00011717.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript (Document 741, filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Sternheim argues there is a lack of documentation or eyewitnesses to corroborate the government's charges. She characterizes Jeffrey Epstein as a wealthy, mysterious 'manipulator' comparable to James Bond, who lived a compartmentalized life with specific eccentricities, and alleges that accusers are motivated by financial gain ('shaking the money tree').
DOJ-OGR-00011716.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the opening statement of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the accusers' memories are unreliable due to media influence and monetary incentives (False Memory Syndrome defense strategy). An objection by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding Sternheim's characterization of investigators is sustained by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00011715.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim. The attorney argues that the four female accusers, who are using pseudonyms, are unreliable witnesses motivated by money ("a payday"). She claims their stories have changed over time, were only told after Epstein's death, and are based on flawed, contaminated memories, which will be discussed in expert testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity