This document is a court transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The testimony describes an FBI search where a safe was opened with a saw, revealing binders of CDs. The witness states they initially lacked authority to seize all the CDs but obtained a search warrant and returned to the residence on July 11th to do so.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by an attorney, Ms. Moe. The testimony serves to authenticate Government Exhibit 929, a photograph of a dressing room and a safe found during a search of a residence. After Maguire confirms the photograph's accuracy and describes its contents, the exhibit is admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of Special Agent Maguire. The government attorney, Ms. Moe, questions Maguire about Government Exhibit 926, a photograph of CDs seized by the FBI from a closet on a fifth floor. Maguire confirms the CDs were marked as evidence Item 1B-63, and the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The witness describes the procedure for seizing and logging evidence, including the use of '1B' tracking numbers. The witness is then asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 926' as a photograph of a drawer in a closet room where CDs were located.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Maguire, by an attorney, Ms. Moe. The questioning concerns Government Exhibit 925, a photograph of binders containing photo thumbnails and CDs that were found in a closet of a residence. The witness confirms these items were seized as evidence during a search and labeled as evidence Item 1B-19.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about admitting evidence. An attorney, Ms. Moe, successfully argues for admitting Government Exhibit 925 under seal because it contains identifying information of third parties, while a redacted version, Exhibit 925-R, is admitted as a public exhibit for the jury to review. The transcript also briefly mentions that FBI personnel were responsible for placing labels on binders related to the case.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The questioning, led by government counsel Ms. Moe, concerns binders found during a search, which are depicted in photographic exhibits. After conferring with opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, Ms. Moe amends her request to admit evidence, withdrawing Exhibit 914 and successfully moving to admit Exhibits 925 and 925-R without objection.
This page is a transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on identifying a 'massage room' and a wooden shelving unit depicted in Government Exhibits 917-R and 928-R. Both exhibits are received into evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on the identification and admission of Government Exhibits 904-R and 917-R, which serve as photographic evidence of a massage room containing a massage table and a doorway leading to an adjoining bathroom. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell offers no objections to the evidence, and the Court admits the exhibits for publication.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing a government attorney, Ms. Moe, conducting a direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The witness identifies Government Exhibits 903-R and 904-R as photographs of a massage room, describing a massage table and other items visible. The attorney then offers one of the exhibits into evidence.
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 902-R and 903-R, which are identified as photographs of an entryway and the interior of a 'massage room.' Defense attorney Mr. Everdell offers no objections to the admission of these exhibits.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire. The testimony concerns a search of a residence where a massage room was discovered on the third floor. The government's attorney, Ms. Moe, questions the agent about the room and successfully introduces a photograph of its entryway as Government Exhibit 902-R.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, introduces a photograph of a blue spiral staircase (Government Exhibit 915-R), which the witness identifies and confirms is an accurate depiction. The exhibit is then admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by counsel Ms. Moe. Maguire testifies about the procedure of a search at a residence, which involved labeling approximately 40 rooms and taking photographs. The agent then identifies Government Exhibits 933, 910, and 911-R as photographs of the residence's entryway and main foyer.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Maguire. Maguire describes the execution of a search warrant at a residence, detailing the 'knock and announce' procedure, the subsequent forced entry when no response was received, and the conducting of a 'protective sweep' to ensure officer safety. The witness also explains the process of photographing the scene and labeling rooms with alphabet letters to document where items were found.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of FBI Special Agent Maguire. Maguire testifies about his role as the search team leader for the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence, located at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan, on July 6, 2019. He explains the duties of a search team leader and confirms his squad provides operational support to other agents' cases.
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of FBI Special Agent Maguire by an attorney, Ms. Moe. Maguire testifies about their four years of experience with the FBI, their assignment to the C20 child exploitation and human trafficking task force, and confirms their participation in an FBI operation on July 6, 2019.
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion between the defense (Mr. Everdell), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Court regarding Exhibit 913, which contains photos of children and other individuals found on a desk; the parties agree to file it under seal due to privacy interests. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the government calls Special Agent Kelly Maguire as a witness.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It records a dialogue between The Court and counsel Ms. Moe regarding the redaction of Exhibit 911, specifically debating whether to redact a painting over a mantel or a small photograph of an individual on a table. Ms. Moe agrees to unredact the painting and instead redact the photograph to protect potential privacy interests or witness identity.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a schoolgirl outfit as evidence. The prosecution argues the outfit corroborates a witness's testimony about Epstein's 'practice' of asking people to wear such costumes. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, contends the evidence is highly prejudicial, based on a single witness, and insufficient to establish a pattern, a position with which the judge seems to agree.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor, Ms. Moe, explains why they did not show certain evidence to victims 'Jane' and 'Kate' during interviews to preserve the integrity of their memories against defense challenges. The Judge challenges the relevance of introducing photos taken in 2019 of 'movable objects' (specifically schoolgirl outfits) to prove a conspiracy that ended 15 years earlier.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, where an unidentified speaker (likely a lawyer) discusses Kate's testimony and questions why certain evidence related to clothing was not presented, referencing a prior ruling from the Court.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument over the admissibility of photo exhibits dated from 2019. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues the photos demonstrate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual preference for schoolgirls, while the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the Judge question the relevance given the time gap and location discrepancies (New York vs. Palm Beach) relative to the charged conspiracy. The text mentions testimony from a witness named 'Kate' regarding schoolgirl outfits.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises an objection regarding the admissibility of exhibits 919 and 920 (photographs of schoolgirl outfits) intended to be introduced by the next witness, Kelly Maguire. Everdell argues that although 'Witness 3' (Kate) described wearing such outfits, she did not identify these specific photos during her testimony, lacking the proper legal foundation required for admission, similar to a previous situation with a witness named Jane.
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It documents the conclusion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, who is then excused. The presiding officer subsequently dismisses the jury for a 15-minute afternoon break.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity