EFTA00029177.pdf
118 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread / internal legal correspondence
File Size:
118 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated July-August 2020. They are discussing the extent of Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement and mention in the original Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation, specifically reviewing grand jury testimony and search warrants. The text quotes an agent's testimony stating Maxwell met 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago and introduced her to Epstein, after which she began providing massages.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned as having a friend named Maxwell and employing Jane Doe Number One for massages.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Subject of inquiry |
Described as a friend of Epstein who introduced him to Jane Doe Number One at Mar-a-Lago. Discussion centers on her s...
|
| Jane Doe Number One | Victim/Witness |
Was working at Mar-a-Lago when she met Maxwell and Epstein; began providing massages for Epstein.
|
| Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney | Sender |
One of the participants in the email thread (USANYS).
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Sender/Recipient organization)
|
|
| SDFL |
Southern District of Florida (referring to the original investigation/files)
|
|
| FBI |
Mention of FBI files and 302s
|
|
| OPR |
Office of Professional Responsibility (investigating the NPA)
|
|
| Mar-a-Lago |
Location where Jane Doe Number One met Maxwell and Epstein.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown (Past)
Introduction of Jane Doe Number One to Epstein
Mar-a-Lago
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Palm Beach, FL
|
|
|
Location of local search warrant
|
|
|
Office location of email participants
|
Relationships (3)
Witness testimony describes her as 'a friend of Mr. Epstein'.
Met at Mar-a-Lago via Maxwell.
Began working and providing massages for Mr. Epstein.
Key Quotes (4)
"Maxwell, who was a friend of Mr. Epstein, met Jane Doe Number One at Mar-a-Lago and Jane Doe Number One soon after began working and providing massages for Mr. Epstein"Source
EFTA00029177.pdf
Quote #1
"Maxwell was added to the caption of the FBI file at some point, and she does come up in some of the 302s"Source
EFTA00029177.pdf
Quote #2
"Maxwell does not come up much, if at all, in the documents they have reviewed in connection with that issue."Source
EFTA00029177.pdf
Quote #3
"There were no federal search warrants, so there would be no applications in which target subjects would be identified."Source
EFTA00029177.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,269 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:57:53 +0000
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:57:53 +0000
What 302s does she come up in other than [Redacted] and [Redacted] and what is the context?
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2020 2:03 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2020 2:03 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
One of the difficulties in answering this question is that we don’t have the pros memo. Here’s what I’ve been able to learn from what we do have:
We do have the transcripts of their grand jury testimony (although not the AUSA preamble). She is not mentioned in the introductory part of the agent’s testimony where they are walking through the various targets and subjects of the investigation. By contrast, Epstein, [Redacted], [Redacted] and [Redacted] are (pp. 5-6). In fact, she only comes up once in the entire grand jury presentation, namely in the context of the agent’s summary of how [Redacted] met Epstein.
Specifically, the agent testifies as follows:
Specifically, the agent testifies as follows:
I’m sorry, the question you asked me was: How did they meet? They met by a friend of Mr. Epstein’s. Jane Doe Number One was working at Mar-a-Lago and a friend of Mr. Epstein’s, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Would you like the spelling?
THE REPORTER: Yes, please.
THE WITNESS: G-H-I-S-L-A-I-N-E, Maxwell, who was a friend of Mr. Epstein, met Jane Doe Number One at Mar-a-Lago and Jane Doe Number One soon after began working and providing massages for Mr. Epstein
Would you like the spelling?
THE REPORTER: Yes, please.
THE WITNESS: G-H-I-S-L-A-I-N-E, Maxwell, who was a friend of Mr. Epstein, met Jane Doe Number One at Mar-a-Lago and Jane Doe Number One soon after began working and providing massages for Mr. Epstein
The fact that she has to spell it strongly suggests the name also didn’t come up during whatever preamble the AUSA provided. But either way, that’s it.
As you know, she is not mentioned in the NPA and, according the lawyer at OPR who is running the NPA investigation, Maxwell does not come up much, if at all, in the documents they have reviewed in connection with that issue.
There were no federal search warrants, so there would be no applications in which target subjects would be identified. There was a local search warrant, but we don’t have a copy because we don’t have the SDFL file and we haven’t asked Palm Beach county for theirs. Presumably we will get that at some point.
Maxwell was added to the caption of the FBI file at some point, and she does come up in some of the 302s (including the [Redacted] and [Redacted] interviews in a manner we’re now familiar with). That said, we have the FBI file, including all of their 302s, and we plan to produce those.
I think the proposal to get the physical file from SDFL makes sense and is manageable. We’ll have to work through how to do that, but OPR has at least some of that material which we could get quickly and start with (including the pros memo), and once we figure out how to get the rest, 24 boxes of material is a doable project.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:17 PM
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:17 PM
[Page 2]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Thanks – yes, having an understanding of how (if at all) Maxwell fits into the Florida evidence and investigation (beyond just the simple view that she wasn’t the focus) would be helpful.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 11:14 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 11:14 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Asking the team to look into this. We don’t have their pros memo (although OPR does and if we wanted to make a more targeted ask, we could conceivably start with that). We do have the one (state) search warrant application for the Palm Beach residence, team will check that now. Team is not aware of any other search warrant applications done as part of the SDFL investigation, but will take a look to confirm. We also have the grand jury testimony and I’m asking team to confirm that Maxwell was not mentioned in that testimony.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 10:55 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 10:55 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: [Redacted]
Do you know, or can you find out, whether Maxwell was identified as a target / subject / target subject or whatever the lingo may have been in any warrants or other materials from the SDFL case, to the extent we know?
[Redacted]
Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document