016.pdf
1.14 MB
Extraction Summary
21
People
13
Organizations
9
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion / court document
File Size:
1.14 MB
Summary
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, claims he has no relevant information regarding Epstein's criminal or civil cases, particularly concerning events prior to September 2005. The motion cites legal precedents regarding the scope of discovery and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c) to argue against the deposition.
People (21)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Igor Zinoviev | Third Party Witness, Driver, Bodyguard |
Works for Jeffrey Epstein, subject of a motion for protective order regarding his deposition.
|
| L.M. | Plaintiff's Counsel (potentially) |
Counsel mentioned in depositions asking questions
|
| E.W. | Plaintiff's Counsel (potentially) |
Counsel mentioned in depositions asking questions
|
| Linnea Johnson | Judge |
Issued the October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377) regarding the scope of discovery.
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein |
Signed the motion for protective order and certificate of service.
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Listed on the service list for related cases.
|
| Adam D. Horowitz | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Listed on the service list for related cases.
|
| Brad Edwards | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893.
|
| Richard Horace Willits | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811.
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe |
Pro Hac Vice counsel.
|
| Jack Scarola | Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. |
Listed on the service list.
|
| Jack P. Hill | Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. |
Listed on the service list.
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469.
|
| Bruce Reinhart | Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen |
Listed on the service list.
|
| Robert C. Josefberg | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656.
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Represented by Bruce Reinhart.
|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804.
|
| Spencer T. Kuvin | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804.
|
Organizations (13)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA |
The court where the case is filed.
|
|
| Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. |
Law firm representing plaintiffs.
|
|
| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler |
Law firm representing a plaintiff.
|
|
| Richard H. Willits, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff.
|
|
| Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff.
|
|
| Garcia Law Firm, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff.
|
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm representing Sarah Kellen.
|
|
| Podhurst Orseck, P.A. |
Law firm representing plaintiffs.
|
|
| Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm representing Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
| Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff.
|
|
| Food Lion, Inc. |
Referenced in a legal citation.
|
|
| United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union |
Referenced in a legal citation.
|
|
| Brown & Williamson Tobacco |
Referenced in a legal citation.
|
Timeline (3 events)
November 2005
Igor Zinoviev began employment with Jeffrey Epstein.
November 2009
Filing of Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoviev's Motion for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law.
Southern District of Florida
October 28, 2009
Judge Linnea Johnson issued Omnibus Order (DE #377) regarding the scope of discovery.
Judge Linnea Johnson
Locations (9)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler.
|
|
|
Address for Richard H. Willits, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Paul G. Cassell.
|
|
|
Address for Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. and Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
|
Relationships (3)
Igor Zinoviev works for Jeffrey Epstein as a driver and bodyguard since November 2005.
Goldberger is counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Reinhart is counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen.
Key Quotes (3)
""While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits.""Source
016.pdf
Quote #1
""[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so.'"Source
016.pdf
Quote #2
""[a] party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or discovery;""Source
016.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (7,112 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 1 of 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
Related cases:
08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
09-80591, 09-80656, 09-08002, 09-81092
08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
09-80591, 09-80656, 09-08002, 09-81092
THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoviev's, ("Mr. Zinoviev") by and through his
undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective
order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:
undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective
order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:
1. As reflected on the affidavit of Igor Zinoviev, attached as Exhibit A, he
works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein") as a driver and bodyguard. He did
not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr.
Epstein in November of 2005.
works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein") as a driver and bodyguard. He did
not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr.
Epstein in November of 2005.
2. Additionally, Mr. Zinoviev would testify as set forth in his affidavit, that
at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal
case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal
case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
1
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 2 of 26
3. In many of the depositions, counsel for L.M. and E.W., has asked them as
witnesses to assume certain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks
their opinions about certain facts. See Exhibit B -Epstein's Motion for Protective Order
to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions.
witnesses to assume certain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks
their opinions about certain facts. See Exhibit B -Epstein's Motion for Protective Order
to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions.
4. There is no information which Mr. Zinoviev has relating to the facts and
circumstances surrounding any of the pending civil cases, in that none of their allegations
directed to Mr. Epstein extend beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever
information Mr. Zinoviev may have, postdates that time.
circumstances surrounding any of the pending civil cases, in that none of their allegations
directed to Mr. Epstein extend beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever
information Mr. Zinoviev may have, postdates that time.
5. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea Johnson noted in her
October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it
is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566,
1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy
[in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow
zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane
on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food &
Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string
cite omitted)."
October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it
is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566,
1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy
[in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow
zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane
on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food &
Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string
cite omitted)."
6. Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that, "[a] party or
any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court
where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect
a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or
expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or
discovery;"
any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court
where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect
a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or
expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or
discovery;"
2
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 3 of 26
7. As set forth in his affidavit, Mr. Zinoviev cannot possibly have any
knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action. Accordingly, the
Court should enter a protective order prohibiting his deposition.
knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action. Accordingly, the
Court should enter a protective order prohibiting his deposition.
WHEREFORE, third-party witness moves this court for a protective order
pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that his deposition not take
place or the questioning be limited.
pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that his deposition not take
place or the questioning be limited.
By:
______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Rule 7.1 Certification
I hereby certify that counsel for the movant has conferred or attempted to confer
with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the
filing of this motion for protective order but has been unable to do so.
with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the
filing of this motion for protective order but has been unable to do so.
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is
being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in
the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ____ day of November, 2009
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is
being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in
the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ____ day of November, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
By:
______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-659-8691
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-659-8691
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
3
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 4 of 26
Service List
Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160
305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877
sm@sexabuseattorney.com
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs
In Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
08-80994
Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160
305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877
sm@sexabuseattorney.com
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs
In Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
08-80994
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: 954-522-3456
Fax: 954-527-8663
bedwards@rraalaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80893
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: 954-522-3456
Fax: 954-527-8663
bedwards@rraalaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80893
Richard Horace Willits, Esq.
Richard H. Willits, P.A.
2640 19th Avenue North
Suite 404
Lake Worth, FL 33461
561-582-7600
Fax: 561-588-8819
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80811
reelrhw@hotmail.com
Richard H. Willits, P.A.
2640 19th Avenue North
Suite 404
Lake Worth, FL 33461
561-582-7600
Fax: 561-588-8819
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80811
reelrhw@hotmail.com
Paul G. Cassell, Esq.
Pro Hac Vice
332 South 1400 E, Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
801-585-5202
801-585-8833 Fax
cassell@law.utah.edu
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Pro Hac Vice
332 South 1400 E, Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
801-585-5202
801-585-8833 Fax
cassell@law.utah.edu
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,
P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
561-686-6300
Fax: 561-383-9424
jsx@searcyhaw.com
jph@searcyhaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,
P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
561-686-6300
Fax: 561-383-9424
jsx@searcyhaw.com
jph@searcyhaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A.
Isidro M. Garcia, Esq.
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7132
561-832-7137 F
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80469
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7132
561-832-7137 F
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80469
Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Robert C. Josefberg, Esq.
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305-358-2800
Fax: 305-358-2382
rjosefberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305-358-2800
Fax: 305-358-2382
rjosefberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
4
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 5 of 26
561-202-6360
Fax: 561-828-0983
ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
Fax: 561-828-0983
ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561-594-8780
Fax: 561-515-2610
skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08804
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561-594-8780
Fax: 561-515-2610
skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08804
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document