Kathy Ruemmler
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional social |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondents advisor advisee |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Stephen J. Immelt
|
Professional recruitment |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Stephen J. Immelt
|
Professional correspondence |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Immelt, Stephen J.
|
Professional correspondents |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Implied prior connection |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sultan
|
Meeting |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
J (Jeffrey Epstein)
|
Professional advisory |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Wolff
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Advisor confidant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Planned meeting between Epstein and Ruemmler where he will 'feed' her. | New York (Epstein's location) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Kathy Ruemmler and Michael Davison | Unknown (likely London or v... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned in-person meeting | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed meeting involving Jeffrey Epstein, Kathy Ruemmler, Bill Clinton, Ehud [Barak], and Steve... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned meeting between Jeffrey and Kathy. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-16 | N/A | Planned conversation/meeting where Ruemmler intends to provide 'so much more info'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-28 | N/A | Kathy canceled trip due to sickness | Unknown origin, destination... | View |
| 2019-03-14 | N/A | Circulation of negative press regarding Epstein's prosecution team among his legal defense team. | View | |
| 2019-01-15 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein emails Kathy Ruemmler and later forwards the email to Michael Wolff outlining the... | View | |
| 2018-12-15 | N/A | An email discussion between Jeffrey Epstein's associates about crafting a public relations narrat... | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-15 | N/A | Email correspondence between Michael Wolff, Jeffrey Epstein, and others discussing a public relat... | N/A (Digital Communication) | View |
| 2018-12-13 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sends news report about Trump inaugural committee investigation to Kathy Ruemmler | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and J regarding Big Tech regulation. | View | |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Kathy Ruemmler sends an email to jeevacation@gmail.com regarding an Axios article. | N/A | View |
| 2018-09-14 | N/A | Coordination regarding individuals named Kathy and Miro, possibly regarding scheduling or locatio... | Unknown | View |
| 2018-08-23 | N/A | Email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler discussing the legal and political trou... | N/A | View |
| 2018-06-23 | N/A | A multi-party email exchange discussing the legal merits of an article critical of the Mueller in... | N/A | View |
| 2018-04-13 | N/A | Proposed 'day of strategy' in Florida | Florida | View |
| 2018-02-25 | N/A | Proposed off-the-record gathering | Unspecified | View |
| 2018-02-24 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein proposes an 'off the record' meeting. | Not specified | View |
| 2017-02-15 | N/A | Kathy Ruemmler met with 'Sultan'. | Unknown | View |
| 2017-01-31 | N/A | Kathy Ruemmler dinner with NYT reporter | Unknown (Dinner) | View |
| 2017-01-21 | N/A | Court appearance (Saturday morning) | Local DC Court | View |
| 2017-01-12 | N/A | Kathy Ruemmler hired by Apple for a patent trial. | Unknown | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | Planned trip to Dubai on Emirates airlines. | Dubai | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.jpg
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.jpg
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.jpg
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to journalist Michael Wolff dated February 15, 2017. Epstein agrees to Wolff's request for introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler for a book Wolff is writing about Donald Trump. Wolff notes he has had direct, 'alarming' contact with Trump for the book project.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026379.jpg
This document is an email thread from February 2016 between Kathy Ruemmler and Stephen J. Immelt of Hogan Lovells. They are discussing a potential career move for Ruemmler to the law firm, with Immelt suggesting a meeting with Michael Davison, the global head of litigation. Ruemmler agrees but insists on discussing compensation first, citing the significance of the move. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.jpg
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein (as 'Jeffrey E.' from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to Kathy Ruemmler on February 27, 2016. Epstein advises Ruemmler to 'ask for a financial proposal' and forwards her a recruitment email from Stephen J. Immelt, the CEO of the law firm Hogan Lovells. Immelt's email discusses the exceptional compensation Ruemmler would receive and mentions a 'Michael' who could provide a 'global perspective' on a case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376.jpg
This document is an email chain from February 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E.), Kathy Ruemmler, and Stephen J. Immelt. The core of the conversation is a job negotiation where Immelt is trying to recruit Ruemmler, suggesting she meet with Michael Davison, the company's 'global head of litigation'. Ruemmler forwards the exchange to Epstein, who advises her that getting things 'in writing would be best'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026372.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 22-23, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They are discussing a third individual, referred to as 'clinton', whom Ruemmler describes as being 'very close to being a psychopath' with 'no conscience'. Epstein details a personal falling out with 'clinton' over contradictory statements, and the two correspond about this individual's manipulative character.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 22-23, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They discuss Epstein's disturbing conversation with an individual named 'macgiver,' whom Ruemmler describes as being 'very close to being a psychopath' with 'no conscience.' In the exchange, Epstein also recounts a past incident that caused him to stop talking to 'clinton' after Clinton allegedly swore to two contradictory statements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026357.jpg
This document is an email dated April 23, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler, with the subject line "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE". The entire body of the email is redacted, indicating the communication is legally privileged. The email includes a standard confidentiality notice from Weinberg's law office and appears to be from a collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler. Ruemmler shares a Bloomberg article about her being a top candidate to become the next Attorney General, after which she and Epstein quickly arrange to speak by phone. The exchange indicates a familiar and direct line of communication between the two.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.jpg
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein ('Jeffrey E.') to Kathy Ruemmler on September 20, 2014. Epstein's one-word reply, "Wow", is in response to a link Ruemmler sent him for a Wikisource page detailing Senator Barack Obama's floor statement on the nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General. The email includes a legal disclaimer stating the communication is confidential and the property of 'JEE'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280.jpg
This document is an email chain from June 23, 2018, showing Jeffrey Epstein ('jeevacation@gmail.com') receiving a forwarded article about the Mueller investigation from Steve Bannon. Epstein adds the comment 'i htink weak thoughts?' and forwards it, prompting a response from Kathy Ruemmler who dismisses the article's legal argument and calls its author, David Rivkin, a 'hack'. The document, marked as evidence from a House Oversight investigation, reveals communication between Epstein and prominent political and legal figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.jpg
This document is an email chain from February 25, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. Epstein forwards a message about Steve Bannon and proposes an 'off the record' meeting with Ruemmler, 'Ehud' (likely Barak), and 'Steve' (likely Bannon), asking if Bill Clinton would want to join. Ruemmler suggests Clinton's lawyer would advise against it, to which Epstein replies with a cryptic comment about 'the right amount of shoes' changing the lawyer's mind.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026269.jpg
This document is an email chain from February 25, 2018, between attorney Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein forwards a message where he proposes an "off the record" gathering with himself, "ehud" (likely Ehud Barak), Steve Bannon, and potentially Bill Clinton. Ruemmler replies that "his lawyer" (presumably Bannon's) would advise against it and asks Epstein if he is feeling better.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 23, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They discuss the legal and political challenges facing Donald Trump, including potential impeachment and illegal acts. Epstein claims to have spoken with 'starr' (likely Ken Starr) the previous day about the indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-12 | Received | Unknown Developer | Kathy Ruemmler | $0.00 | Discussion of real estate negotiation including... | View |
| 2017-01-12 | Received | Developer | Kathy Ruemmler | $0.00 | Discussion of potential real estate negotiation... | View |
| 2017-01-12 | Received | Unknown (Developer) | Kathy Ruemmler | $0.00 | Potential real estate purchase involving 'commi... | View |
| 2014-09-19 | Paid | Kathy Ruemmler | Landlord (implied) | $0.00 | Discussion regarding rent on an apartment being... | View |
| 2014-09-19 | Received | Unknown | Kathy Ruemmler | $0.00 | Discussion regarding 'rent on the apartment' be... | View |
No Subject
Suggests Trump's argument is that using his own money was not illegal. Mentions that he spoke with 'starr' the previous day about indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
No Subject
Shares a story from The New York Times about the 'principled case for impeachment'.
No Subject
Suggests Trump's argument is that using his own money was not illegal. Mentions that he spoke with 'starr' the previous day about indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
No Subject
Shares a story from The New York Times about the 'principled case for impeachment'.
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
A short reply to Kathy Ruemmler: 'agreed. ill pass it on :)'
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
A short reply to Kathy Ruemmler: 'agreed. ill pass it on :)'
Fwd: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
Jeffrey E. forwarded Steve Bannon's email with the comment 'Fun'. Note: The timestamp (10:57 AM) precedes the original email's timestamp (1:21 PM), likely due to a timezone display issue in the email client.
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
Expressed frustration ('This drives me f*ing crazy.') with Bannon ('your boy') for defending Donald Trump's 'birther' theory about Barack Obama, stating Bannon 'loses credibility' for defending 'obvious Trump lies'.
Fwd: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
Jeffrey E. forwarded Steve Bannon's email with the comment 'Fun'. Note: The timestamp (10:57 AM) precedes the original email's timestamp (1:21 PM), likely due to a timezone display issue in the email client.
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
Expressed frustration ('This drives me f*ing crazy.') with Bannon ('your boy') for defending Donald Trump's 'birther' theory about Barack Obama, stating Bannon 'loses credibility' for defending 'obvious Trump lies'.
Fwd: Re:
Commented 'i htink weak thoughts?' and forwarded the email chain he received from Steve Bannon.
Re: Fwd: Re:
Responded to the forwarded chain with a dismissive legal analysis: 'Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.'
Fwd: Re:
Commented 'i htink weak thoughts?' and forwarded the email chain he received from Steve Bannon.
Re: Fwd: Re:
Responded to the forwarded chain with a dismissive legal analysis: 'Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.'
Fwd: Re:
i htink weak thoughts?
Re: Fwd: Re:
Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.
Re: Fwd: Re:
exactly my view. on facebook I thought you might look at the recent internet and privacy opinions and pose some open questions... mark wants to bring the internet to the rest of the world... his wife is nice but boring...
Fwd: Re:
i htink weak thoughts?
No Subject
Forwarding email from Steve Bannon regarding a Politico article. Asks: 'do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record.'
No Subject
While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-) Are you feeling better today?
No Subject
onlyu slightly. [Redacted] said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo
No Subject
Uh oh — You dimed out [Redacted]. What is Benjamin upset about?
No Subject
she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh
No Subject
Barf.
No Subject
Forwarded email from Steve Bannon with Politico link.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity