Event Details
Unknown
Description
The Trial
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| juror | person | 81 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
EFTA00032599.pdf
This is a private and confidential letter from a redacted individual identifying as a victim to a redacted recipient (likely a legal authority). The sender references a past meeting during the pandemic, inquires about how to listen to an upcoming trial (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) or receive transcripts, and expresses distress about being 'exposed to a nightmare' and dehumanized. The document contains significant redactions regarding specific details but includes a quote about the dangers of silence in the age of social media.
DOJ-OGR-00010257.jpg
This document is page 42 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a questioning session, likely of a juror (Juror 50), regarding their decision to give press interviews about their status as a sexual abuse victim. The witness explains they did not believe their family or friends would find out because they didn't use their full name and assumed the story wouldn't be major news.
DOJ-OGR-00021049.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents (page i) for an appellate brief filed on February 28, 2023, in Case 22-1426. It outlines legal arguments asserting that the 'Appellant' (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell) should have all counts dismissed based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), claiming status as a third-party beneficiary and arguing that the USAO-SDNY is bound by the 'potential co-conspirators' provision.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court Recess due to Juror Illness
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
A post-verdict hearing was held where a trial court found a juror demonstrated bias.
Date unknown
A court official outlines the daily schedule and procedure for the jury selection process (voir dire).
2021-12-08 • public courtroom
A trial concerning alleged sex crimes against underage girls, involving sexually suggestive or explicit evidence.
Date unknown
Discussion of the legal doctrine of 'inferred bias' in the context of jury selection and dismissal for cause.
Date unknown
A hearing where a juror gave answers about childhood abuse.
Date unknown
A juror in the Sampson case had been threatened by her husband with a gun, which she did not disclose during a gunpoint bank robbery case.
Date unknown
A juror in the Ashfar case was sexually assaulted by a babysitter when he was five or six years old, which he did not disclose during a child sexual assault case.
Date unknown
In the cited case of Torres, the district court struck a juror for cause because she had engaged in the structuring of cash deposits.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event