Event Details
Unknown (Past)
Description
State Attorney in Palm Beach County dropped a case regarding Jane Doe #3.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigating Detective | person | 2 | View Entity |
| state attorney | person | 22 | View Entity |
| Doe | person | 125 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014105.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the case involving Alan Dershowitz. It details the Defendant's objections to Requests for Production #12 and #13, which seek evidence regarding claims that Jane Doe #3 lied about world leaders and that a Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case due to her lack of credibility. Dershowitz's defense emphasizes that his original declaration stated these claims were made 'on information and belief' and agrees to produce non-privileged documents in his possession.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Alleged sexual encounter or inappropriate contact
Date unknown • Little Saint James Island
Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3
Date unknown • Unknown
Transmission of a document containing an agreement regarding confidential information obtained via subpoena for crime investigation.
2005-07-15 • Palm Beach
The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), addressed the knowledge requirement for a lawyer to report a belief that an opposing witness had lied.
1988-01-01 • Connecticut
The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.
Date unknown
The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.
Date unknown
A court hearing is held on the matter of the offender's petition for relief from registration.
Date unknown • the circuit in which the petition is filed
Connecticut disciplinary hearing for 'Doe'
Date unknown • Connecticut
A direct examination took place where Jack Goldberger's co-counsel refused to provide copies of documents and photographs used as exhibits and refused to allow the court reporter to mark them.
2008-02-20
The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which a lawyer was disciplined for not reporting a belief that an opposing witness lied in a deposition.
1988-01-01 • Connecticut
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event