You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Event Details

Unknown

Description

Investigation of Juror No. 1

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Edelstein person 115 View Entity
Nardello person 12 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009402.jpg

Court Transcript / Deposition • 427 KB
View

This is a court transcript page filed on February 24, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). A witness named Edelstein is being questioned about whether their legal team had the resources to investigate Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, specifically regarding a prior personal injury lawsuit she failed to fully disclose during voir dire. Edelstein admits they had the resources to call investigators (Nardello) but did not do so initially because they didn't believe the Catherine Conrad in the Westlaw report was the same person as the juror.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.

Date unknown

View

Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.

Date unknown

View

The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.

Date unknown

View

A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

View

A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.

Date unknown

View

A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.

0012-05-01

View

Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

View

A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.

Date unknown

View

Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.

Date unknown

View

Edelstein is questioned about his knowledge of Juror No. 1's identity and potential connection to a suspended attorney named Catherine M. Conrad.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 22:18

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009402.jpg
Date String
Unknown

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event