Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Edelstein person 115 View Entity
Ms. Brune person 82 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010085.jpg

Unknown type • 441 KB
View

This document is a transcript of legal testimony where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about a brief they co-authored. The questioning focuses on whether the brief was intentionally written to mislead the reader about when Edelstein learned of Juror Catherine Conrad's suspension as a lawyer, particularly in relation to receiving a letter from the government. Edelstein admits the brief could be misread but denies any malicious intent, a claim the questioner challenges by referencing a specific decision made with a colleague, Ms. Brune.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.

Date unknown

View

Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.

Date unknown

View

Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.

Date unknown

View

Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.

Date unknown • The Court

View

A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

View

A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.

Date unknown

View

A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.

0012-05-01

View

Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Decision Making
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:36

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010085.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event