Event Details
July 08, 2011
Description
Motion for a new trial filed
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune & Richard lawyers | person | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010127.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 6, 2012, presents an opinion on the ethical obligations of Brune & Richard lawyers concerning disclosures related to a new trial motion involving juror Conrad. It concludes that the lawyers did not violate their ethical obligations in their research, motions, or communications with the Court. The opinion is based on a review of various legal documents and transcripts, and references the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Brune & Richard lawyers conducted research
2011-01-01
Telephone conference call with the Court
2011-07-15
Brune & Richard lawyers reviewed alternatives after an investigation and decided to do nothing regarding an issue with a juror.
0012-05-01
A hearing where Laurie Edelstein testified about the alternatives considered by the Brune & Richard lawyers.
Date unknown • Court
Brune & Richard lawyers made discoveries relevant to a case.
2011-01-01
Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
2011-06-20
A Memorandum of Law was created/filed.
2011-07-08
Events surrounding the July 8 Memorandum of Law and discussions of ethical duties.
2011-01-01 • Court
Discoveries/information gathering by lawyers (referenced retrospectively).
2011-01-01 • Unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event