Event Details
January 01, 2011
Description
Events surrounding the July 8 Memorandum of Law and discussions of ethical duties.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune & Richard lawyers | person | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009453.jpg
This document is an exhibit (A-5849) filed on Feb 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), but originates from a 2012 filing in the 'United States v. Daugerdas' case (1:09-cr-00581-WHP). The text analyzes the ethical conduct of lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard regarding their knowledge of misconduct by 'juror Conrad' and whether they had a duty to disclose information discovered in March and May 2011. It concludes that the lawyers did not have 'actual knowledge' requiring disclosure under Rules 3.3(b) and 3.5(d).
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Brune & Richard lawyers conducted research
2011-01-01
Motion for a new trial filed
2011-07-08
Telephone conference call with the Court
2011-07-15
Brune & Richard lawyers reviewed alternatives after an investigation and decided to do nothing regarding an issue with a juror.
0012-05-01
A hearing where Laurie Edelstein testified about the alternatives considered by the Brune & Richard lawyers.
Date unknown • Court
Brune & Richard lawyers made discoveries relevant to a case.
2011-01-01
Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
2011-06-20
A Memorandum of Law was created/filed.
2011-07-08
Discoveries/information gathering by lawyers (referenced retrospectively).
2011-01-01 • Unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event