Event Details
June 20, 2011
Description
Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecutor | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Brune & Richard lawyers | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Juror Conrad | person | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010132.jpg
This legal document, page 7 of a court filing from April 6, 2012, analyzes a July 8, 2011 Memorandum of Law concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. It argues that the firm's lawyers had no professional duty to disclose information discovered in March and May because the relevant ethics rules require 'actual knowledge,' which the lawyers lacked. The discussion is framed by the receipt of a letter from 'juror Conrad' on June 20 and the adversarial nature of the legal system.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.
2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court
Brune & Richard lawyers conducted research
2011-01-01
Motion for a new trial filed
2011-07-08
Telephone conference call with the Court
2011-07-15
Brune & Richard lawyers reviewed alternatives after an investigation and decided to do nothing regarding an issue with a juror.
0012-05-01
A hearing where Laurie Edelstein testified about the alternatives considered by the Brune & Richard lawyers.
Date unknown • Court
A conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor regarding Jane's testimony.
2021-01-01
The document discusses the nature of plea negotiations between a defendant and a prosecutor, specifically whether they can bind other districts.
Date unknown
Brune & Richard lawyers made discoveries relevant to a case.
2011-01-01
A Memorandum of Law was created/filed.
2011-07-08
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event