June 20, 2011
Ms. Brune's firm received Ms. Conrad's letter.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune's firm | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Ms. Conrad | person | 69 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009371.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on why her firm did not raise an issue of juror misconduct concerning a Ms. Conrad, despite receiving a letter from her on June 20, 2011, which was approximately three weeks after the case verdict on May 24, 2011. Brune states that she did not believe juror misconduct had occurred and explains her general criteria for selecting jurors, emphasizing the importance of following the judge's instructions.
Events with shared participants
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
2012-02-15 • Federal Court
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
2025-12-20 • Federal Court
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
2011-03-01 • Federal Court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
The government received Ms. Conrad's letter.
2025-05-01
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
A past event where Ms. Conrad responded to questions, stating her highest level of education was a BA and that she was a stay-at-home wife.
Date unknown
The witness, Ms. Conrad, is testifying under court order.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
A subpoena was served on the witness by Judge Pauley.
2011-12-20
The witness met with Ms. Sternheim six times before the current date.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event