Event Details
December 20, 2011
Description
A subpoena was served on the witness by Judge Pauley.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Ms. Conrad | person | 69 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a witness, likely Ms. Conrad, in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. The questioning focuses on her understanding of a court order and subpoena issued by Judge Pauley, her legal training, and her prior statements to court staff that she would not appear or testify. The witness also mentions having met Ms. Sternheim six times and having 'Googled' the questioner after a previous trial.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
2012-02-15 • Federal Court
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
2025-12-20 • Federal Court
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
2011-03-01 • Federal Court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
The government received Ms. Conrad's letter.
2025-05-01
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
2011-12-20 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event