Event Details
Unspecified
Description
Legal strategy session regarding juror misconduct
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
| Susan Brune | person | 62 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009404.jpg
This document is page 343 of a deposition transcript involving a witness named Edelstein (likely regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, given the context of juror misconduct). The testimony details legal strategy discussions between Edelstein and Susan Brune regarding a juror who shared a name with a suspended lawyer. They discussed how to address their knowledge of this potential identity match in a legal brief drafted by Theresa Trzaskoma.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified.
Date unknown • Court
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.
0012-05-01
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event