January 01, 2012
The case of Kawashima v. Holder, which interpreted the phrase “offenses that involve fraud or deceit”.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kawashima | person | 14 | View Entity |
| Holder | person | 28 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002667.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated February 4, 2021, which argues for a specific interpretation of the statutory phrase "offense involving." It cites several court precedents, including cases like Kawashima v. Holder and United States v. Morgan, to support the position that this phrase requires looking at the essential elements of the crime itself, not merely the surrounding circumstances. The D.C. Circuit's analysis of a venue statute is used as a key example to illustrate that for an offense to 'involve' an activity like interstate transportation, that activity must be a formal element of the offense.
Events with shared participants
Invoice number 4-495-75031 was issued on this date.
2002-12-23
Citation to Nijhawan v. Holder, which held that a statute with an 'offense ... involves' phrase is consistent with a circumstance-specific approach.
2009-01-01
Legal case citation for Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009).
2009-01-01
Supreme Court decision in Nijhawan v. Holder.
2009-01-01 • Supreme Court
Supreme Court case Nijhawan v. Holder
2009-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event