Event Details
January 01, 2009
Description
Citation to Nijhawan v. Holder, which held that a statute with an 'offense ... involves' phrase is consistent with a circumstance-specific approach.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nijhawan | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Holder | person | 28 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021707.jpg
This legal document presents an argument against Maxwell's interpretation of Section 3283 of the U.S. Code. The author refutes Maxwell's claim that the phrase "offense involving" requires a narrow, elements-based analysis, citing precedents like *Weingarten* and *Nijhawan* to support a broader, circumstance-specific approach. The document distinguishes the cases cited by Maxwell by arguing they involved different statutory language, specifically definitions of a "crime of violence," which are not present here.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Invoice number 4-495-75031 was issued on this date.
2002-12-23
The case of Kawashima v. Holder, which interpreted the phrase “offenses that involve fraud or deceit”.
2012-01-01
Legal case citation for Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009).
2009-01-01
Supreme Court decision in Nijhawan v. Holder.
2009-01-01 • Supreme Court
Supreme Court case Nijhawan v. Holder
2009-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event