January 01, 2009
Supreme Court case Nijhawan v. Holder
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nijhawan | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Holder | person | 28 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000127.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal analysis discussing the interpretation of statutory language, specifically § 3283, and the application of 'categorical' versus 'circumstance-specific' approaches in legal contexts. It references several court cases including United States v. Schneider (2015), Weingarten (865 F.3d at 58), United States v. Morgan (2004), and Nijhawan v. Holder (2009), to support the argument that courts should look beyond bare legal charges to the circumstances of an offense, especially when a statute uses the word 'involves'.
Events with shared participants
Invoice number 4-495-75031 was issued on this date.
2002-12-23
Citation to Nijhawan v. Holder, which held that a statute with an 'offense ... involves' phrase is consistent with a circumstance-specific approach.
2009-01-01
The case of Kawashima v. Holder, which interpreted the phrase “offenses that involve fraud or deceit”.
2012-01-01
Legal case citation for Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009).
2009-01-01
Supreme Court decision in Nijhawan v. Holder.
2009-01-01 • Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event