Event Details

Unspecified

Description

Deposition testimony regarding privilege and common interest agreements

Participants (4)

Name Type Mentions
Mr. Simpson person 97 View Entity
Mr. Scott person 18 View Entity
MS. McCAWLEY person 68 View Entity
witness person 107 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg

Legal Deposition Transcript • 1.22 MB
View

This document is page 38 of a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861). It details a legal argument regarding attorney/client privilege concerning communications with 'Miss Roberts' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre). Attorneys Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scott, and Ms. McCawley discuss the assertion of privilege and the existence of a 'common interest agreement,' with Ms. McCawley objecting to questions seeking details of said written agreement.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Deposition/Testimony of Professor Cassell

Date unknown • Unknown

View

A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.

Date unknown • Not specified

View

Deposition Interruption

Date unknown • Deposition Room

View

Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.

Date unknown • Southern District of Florida

View

Disruption during deposition

Date unknown • Deposition Room

View

Firm partner meetings.

2009-01-01 • RRA Firm

View

Deposition testimony regarding statements made about Virginia Roberts.

Date unknown • N/A

View

Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.

Date unknown • Property

View

Deposition of Cassell

Date unknown • Unknown

View

Marking of Cassell Exhibit 1

Date unknown • Deposition room

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
4
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 19:31

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
Date String
Unspecified

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event