HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
1.22 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal deposition transcript
File Size:
1.22 MB
Summary
This document is page 38 of a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861). It details a legal argument regarding attorney/client privilege concerning communications with 'Miss Roberts' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre). Attorneys Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scott, and Ms. McCawley discuss the assertion of privilege and the existence of a 'common interest agreement,' with Ms. McCawley objecting to questions seeking details of said written agreement.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Miss Roberts | Subject of legal inquiry |
Client receiving legal services; asserting attorney/client privilege.
|
| Mr. Simpson | Questioning Attorney |
Conducting the examination.
|
| Mr. Scott | Attorney |
Interjecting to clarify the scope of privilege assertions.
|
| Ms. McCawley | Attorney |
Objecting to questions regarding the details of a common interest agreement.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Deponent |
The person being questioned (referred to as 'he' by Ms. McCawley).
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unspecified
Deposition testimony regarding privilege and common interest agreements
Unknown
Relationships (2)
Witness states 'providing legal services to Miss Roberts'
Ms. McCawley objects on behalf of the witness regarding the common interest agreement.
Key Quotes (3)
"She will be asserting attorney/client privilege and I'm not at liberty to waive that for her."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
Quote #1
"Is there any written agreement memorializing a common interest agreement?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
Quote #2
"You're allowed to know the existence of the agreement; he testified to that. The details, you're not entitled to."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,244 characters)
38
1 respect to confidential communications that were part of
2 providing legal services to Miss Roberts, yes, I will be
3 asserting -- well, she's -- let me be a little more
4 precise.
5 She will be asserting attorney/client
6 privilege and I'm not at liberty to waive that for her.
7 Q. And we will make a proffer later as to
8 questions we would ask about your communications with
9 Miss Roberts as we believe those are not privileged,
10 but --
11 MR. SCOTT: As well as the others.
12 MR. SIMPSON: As well as the others that
13 have --
14 MR. SCOTT: Attorney/client.
15 MR. SIMPSON: -- attorney/client the
16 privilege has been asserted.
17 BY MR. SIMPSON:
18 Q. Let me go back to the common interest group.
19 Is there any written agreement memorializing a common
20 interest agreement?
21 MS. McCAWLEY: I'm going to object to the
22 extent that it seeks details of an agreement.
23 You're allowed to know the existence of the
24 agreement; he testified to that. The details,
25 you're not entitled to.
2 providing legal services to Miss Roberts, yes, I will be
3 asserting -- well, she's -- let me be a little more
4 precise.
5 She will be asserting attorney/client
6 privilege and I'm not at liberty to waive that for her.
7 Q. And we will make a proffer later as to
8 questions we would ask about your communications with
9 Miss Roberts as we believe those are not privileged,
10 but --
11 MR. SCOTT: As well as the others.
12 MR. SIMPSON: As well as the others that
13 have --
14 MR. SCOTT: Attorney/client.
15 MR. SIMPSON: -- attorney/client the
16 privilege has been asserted.
17 BY MR. SIMPSON:
18 Q. Let me go back to the common interest group.
19 Is there any written agreement memorializing a common
20 interest agreement?
21 MS. McCAWLEY: I'm going to object to the
22 extent that it seeks details of an agreement.
23 You're allowed to know the existence of the
24 agreement; he testified to that. The details,
25 you're not entitled to.
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document