Event Details
January 01, 2003
Description
Supreme Court case Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | location | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000132.tif
This document discusses the legislative history and intent behind the PROTECT Act's retroactivity provisions, emphasizing that Congress removed an express retroactivity clause due to constitutional concerns. It cites a Supreme Court case (Stogner v. California) and Senator Leahy's statements to argue that the Act applies to past conduct, like Maxwell's, where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.
1974-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.
2016-01-01 • Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.
0013-08-28 • United States
Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.
0008-05-30
Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).
0008-01-28
Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.
1964-01-01 • Supreme Court
Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA
2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.
Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor
1960-01-01 • USA
Roe v. Wade
Date unknown • US Supreme Court
Bush v. Gore
2000-01-01 • US Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event